Valhalla Legends Archive

But I believe yes it is possible, though I have not tried anything dealing with such a matter I know you can write to vectors on images so I don't see why you couldn't copy data from vectors xy to xy.

Quote from: Ringo on September 25, 2006, 01:35 PM
ImaWh0re, there is a forum for you here, Clicky
I feel the need to point out, this is not the Verbal Bashing forum, its the Visual Basic forum :p

right.

like that avatar you have.

Quote from: Joex86] link=topic=15762.msg158982#msg158982 date=1159186444]
ImaWh0re, I was going to consider your claims for half a second, but the way you come here and start ragging on our members in such an idiotic sense has lost you any chance of redemption in my books. I have more respect for Lord[nK] than you. Good job.

You don't have to respect me for my claims to be true
People don't like hearing the truth.

------------------
and it only seems like "an idiotic sense" because people trailed so far off from the original topic that it all got lost in translation. I can ensure you though that I am quite right about everything I have said.

Did you miss the part where I said if you have doubt PM me about which parts, and I would provide proof. Or are you just an every day village idiot that rambles to have their two cents put in. I made it very clear I could backup everything I have said, if you chose not to take advantage of that, it's your choice. But you can do so through PMs, this thread is long enough as is. So stop talking shit for two moments and understand your surroundings. It's people like you that make such discussions turn into flame wars. I've been trying to avoid keeping this thread going by requesting through PMs. So you can just shut the fuck up and PM me if you have a problem, and that applies to everyone.

Quote from: FrOzeN on September 24, 2006, 10:39 PM

It's simple as, "No one gives a fuck what you have to say anymore."

Then why are you replying? For someone that doesn't care you seem to be showing a lot of interest if you ask me.

Quote from: topaz on September 25, 2006, 12:31 AM

Quote from: ImaWh0re on September 25, 2006, 12:16 AM

Quote from: l2k-Shadow on September 25, 2006, 12:08 AM
Yes, however, Left$(PktBuff, PacketLength) does not return a number.

Msgbox Val#(Left$("23",2))

Better? Comprende?

The point is, you're not supposed to do it. Val# returns a Double (which is a float, iirc), whereas it expects a Long.

That it does, I was just trying to state that it doesn't matter if you do that to a string. As I said before the coding was whacked. By the way, I find it very funny how you people look this up before saying something, it's like its battle of the wits after googling information. I'm not flaming any person when I say that either, just saying.


Although yes it should of been common sense on my part. I was wrong, I don't have a problem admitting to that unlike a lot of people.

Quote from: l2k-Shadow on September 25, 2006, 12:08 AM
Yes, however, Left$(PktBuff, PacketLength) does not return a number.

Msgbox Val#(Left$("23",2))

Better? Comprende?

Quote from: l2k-Shadow on September 24, 2006, 08:47 PM

Quote from: ImaWh0re on September 24, 2006, 07:29 PM

Quote from: Abolition on September 24, 2006, 05:40 PM

Quote from: l2k-Shadow on September 24, 2006, 05:38 PM
you have an extra ) at the end

Sorry, I made a mistake in my post. It was supposed be:

Code Select Expand


ParseData (Left(PktBuff, PacketLength))


I still get the same error.

Not exactly how I would do things but you can try
ParseData (Val#(Left$(PktBuff, PacketLength)))

But by the looks of this you arn't extracting the packet ID to begin with. So I have a feeling you are going to have a lot more problems in the future.

Yes! Use Val#() on a string, excellent suggestion.

Dear MORON,
  Msgbox Val#("23")

Quote from: Abolition on September 24, 2006, 05:40 PM

Quote from: l2k-Shadow on September 24, 2006, 05:38 PM
you have an extra ) at the end

Sorry, I made a mistake in my post. It was supposed be:

Code Select Expand


ParseData (Left(PktBuff, PacketLength))


I still get the same error.

Not exactly how I would do things but you can try
ParseData (Val#(Left$(PktBuff, PacketLength)))

But by the looks of this you arn't extracting the packet ID to begin with. So I have a feeling you are going to have a lot more problems in the future.

Quote from: Warrior on September 24, 2006, 02:20 PM
I'm with l2k on this however, it's impossible for code which contains pure API calls to be ripped.

This is all pointless arguing.

You are completely missing the point. Read the whole thread over and over until you get it. If you still don't get it feel free to PM me. Although I would think I wouldn't have to explain this to people.

Quote from: rabbit on September 24, 2006, 07:19 AM
Didn't Fleet- quit Battle.Net?  Anyway, I'm with Shadow, ImaWh0re: you're being a douchebag.  Shut up.

He isn't active any more, it's hard to get a hold of him. But he still idles in cell on east.
And why am I a doucheag? Maybe you should do your research as well.  I havn't said anything untrue.

Like I said if you want to actually make a point or try to make a point you can PM me. I'm sure you don't understand the whole situation, which exceeds beyond these forums. You have to understand another persons point of view as well.


oh, and rabbit...

Get a life dipshit.

ROFL!

"Key tester of mine? Open source duplicate?"
These are two different statements, as any person would take it.. "Key tester of mine?" is saying "What key tester of mine" in different wording. And the same applies to the other question. This is not a case of poor punctuation it is a case of your ignorance because you thought no one even KNEW about it. So what you are trying to say, is a very bad execuse. And for someone that types in such perfect grammar such as yourself would know this.


"because unlike you, I don't release programs which aren't completely written by me."
You must have me mistaken, because I don't release any programs public.


And yes looking at sources can be a good way to learn but is inefficient. However stealing them is not. Making a few modifications to a program does NOT make it yours. And I quote you, "I have never ripped a program". That being said, you just made a liar out of yourself.

Just incase, let me define this for you: http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/never

Also just because you don't know how to use a razor, doesn't give you the right to call others "kid". Not to mention...arn't you like, 14...15?


Now to end all things to come.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
We learned you have infact lied recently, and in the past.
We learned you have infact stolen code recently, and also in the past.
We learned that you try to manipulate situations by play on words and false acusations of others, and completely avoiding the subject in general.
We learned that you talk out of your ass, when you don't even know what you are doing yourself.
-----------------------------
That being said, if anyone would like me to provide proof and or has doubt to what I have said above feel free to PM me and I will supply you with links, screenshots, and all that is nessicary.

I've decided to put my foot in this 'competition' of you vs fleet-. Obviously fleet- HAS taken many snippets from the past and he has admitted to it. But he does not lie and spread false information like you. Let me guess, this makes me "Fleet-'s dick sucker" for proving you are one big pile of shit? K Thanks.

I can make a promise to everyone on this forum to never flame l2k-shadow again being that this has been said and done. If he wants to reply, which he probably will, I will still cease to persue it. That being said, just because I won't reply to any more of l2k-shadow's crap, does not mean I don't have something to say. If anyone wants opinions you can PM me.

Quote from: Mystical on September 23, 2006, 11:23 PM


does it really matter who rips, I've seen plenty of people rip countless times.
People rip from each other basicly daily including ideas, sources, what ever it maybe so what?

whats with all the bitching, defence, moanin and cryin about get over it.

I just think anyone that thinks of himself as such a big person and talks so much shit, and he does, deserves to have the truth dropped down on them. He may not talk shit here, well he already has from what I've seen, but you get the idea. I've been following the whole propaganda thing between fleet- and l2k-shadow and it all seems to start with l2k-shadow. I'm not just here to make him look bad though I try to help where I can.

Quote from: l2k-Shadow on September 23, 2006, 10:21 PM
ok? that program is 2 years old, thus I was a beginner coder back then, it was one of my first battle.net projects, and I still don't see how you posting a 2 year old program of mine is suggesting that i rip sources.

http://www.layeredweb.com/~raidenzx/sources/vb/MASS%20Key%20Tester.zip
the source you stole as a whole. woot for connections.


PS: I talked to fleet- about your element 2 comment and he said that he did get the hashing functions from other projects but did all the other packeting himself such as warcraft III clan invitations, friends list, and such.


Edit for Fr0zen. (Sorry didn't see your post until after).
But I did post the source he got it from. And if you've seen the ruthless`ops leaked source, it also appears very leeched. I believe this has been commented some where as well. And I don't have the key tester source, why would I.

---------------
To l2k-shadow:
  Why do you first deny even have MAKING a key tester, then once it pops up you have some other excuse? Are you telling me you can't keep track of the things you make? I find that very hard to believe. Something might slip your mind but not when it is blatently mentioned.

Quote from: TheMinistered on September 23, 2006, 10:23 PM
Well, I particularly don't see a problem with copy/paste as long as you know whats going on with the code (i.e. you've written similar code before but too lazy to recreate).  In a scenario you've handled before, I see no problem copying code so long as you understand the code.

As for copying an entire project, etc... thats a big no no I agree.  But certain functions or snippets it MIGHT be ok under some circumstances such as repetative winsock code such as this... I think we've all used the winsock api more times than we can count, who wants to rewrite it YET ANOTHER TIME?

I never said he had to write his own. But he put his name on it as if he created it. "by l2k-shadow". If say that snippet was used in a large project I see no reason not to put your name on the project itself. But as he put it, is saying he coded it which he did not. I'm sure this isn't the first time he's taken snippets and slapped his name on it either. Just making a point, again.

Quote from: l2k-Shadow on September 23, 2006, 07:06 PM
No but I do see "Element Chat v2.0  Þ  By Fleet-" on it.

Key tester of mine? Open source duplicate? And you get that information from *looks around* where?

Take it up with fleet- then, I have looked through the source and it seems very original. I have also looked through many other sources of his which appear original as well. The only thing I noticed was that the connection seemed similar. But then again there are only so many ways you can connect to battle.net. So even if you do write every single last bit of code yourself it will look very similar.

http://www.fapiko.com/raiden/leaked/
Your 'key tester'. Let me guess, your first year of coding that no one knows about was ripping sources?