5 female captives released regarding Jill Carroll

[CrAz3D]

http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/meast/01/24/iraq.main/index.html
Uhm, WTF?

Why did they begin to meet their demands?

[Grok]

I TOLD YOU SO.

Something was fishy about this one from the start.  Is she a CIA operative?  Maybe related to someone very rich and powerful?

[Adron]

It just goes to show how the USA is weak and supports terrorism.

[Grok]

We're sending the wrong message to the terrorists.

[iago]

It's no worse than the "we are terrified of you" message that everybody has been sending for years.

[CrAz3D]

So what would be an effective "fuck off you crazy middle easterns!" message?  (NOTE: that 'crazy middle easterns' thing refers to the middle easterns that are crazy, it does not mean that all middle easterns are crazy)

I can think of one, but I don't think everyone would like it

[iago]

So what would be an effective "fuck off you crazy middle easterns!" message?  (NOTE: that 'crazy middle easterns' thing refers to the middle easterns that are crazy, it does not mean that all middle easterns are crazy)

I don't think there are any effective ways to stop terrorism by force.  Perhaps your country should pursue a different method?

[Invert]

The 5 female captives are not the only prisoners that are being reviewed and released. Officials say that this has nothing to do with Jill Carroll and that these prisoners were up for review before Jill Carrolls abduction.

The liberal media (CNN in this case) that spins every story out there which forces the public to misconstrued things is the result of this kind of nonsense.

Adron, you are wrong. The only thing that this shows is that you are ready to bash the United States the 1st chance you get without knowing any details. This also shows that your posts should never be taken seriously unless proven otherwise.

[Invert]

So what would be an effective "fuck off you crazy middle easterns!" message?  (NOTE: that 'crazy middle easterns' thing refers to the middle easterns that are crazy, it does not mean that all middle easterns are crazy)

I don't think there are any effective ways to stop terrorism by force.  Perhaps your country should pursue a different method?

Oh yeah, so if an Israeli soldier shoots a terrorist that is running towards a check point with a bomb strapped to him in the head and the terrorist dies before ever harming anyone is not an effective way to stop the terrorist?

[CrAz3D]

So what would be an effective "fuck off you crazy middle easterns!" message?  (NOTE: that 'crazy middle easterns' thing refers to the middle easterns that are crazy, it does not mean that all middle easterns are crazy)

I don't think there are any effective ways to stop terrorism by force.  Perhaps your country should pursue a different method?

Oh yeah, so if an Israeli soldier shoots a terrorist that is running towards a check point with a bomb strapped to him in the head and the terrorist dies before ever harming anyone is not an effective way to stop the terrorist?

Thats what I was getting to, but on a larger scale

[iago]

Oh yeah, so if an Israeli soldier shoots a terrorist that is running towards a check point with a bomb strapped to him in the head and the terrorist dies before ever harming anyone is not an effective way to stop the terrorist?

If a terrorist did that, then Israel declared war on the terrorist's country and started attacking their cities, then no, that doesn't stop the terrorists. 

Besides, I didn't say "violence won't stop a terrorist", obviusly it will.  I said it won't stop terrorism, which is completely different.  You can kill one, but more will take his place.

[CrAz3D]

Oh yeah, so if an Israeli soldier shoots a terrorist that is running towards a check point with a bomb strapped to him in the head and the terrorist dies before ever harming anyone is not an effective way to stop the terrorist?

If a terrorist did that, then Israel declared war on the terrorist's country and started attacking their cities, then no, that doesn't stop the terrorists. 

Besides, I didn't say "violence won't stop a terrorist", obviusly it will.  I said it won't stop terrorism, which is completely different.  You can kill one, but more will take his place.

Not if you kill them all

[iago]

Oh yeah, so if an Israeli soldier shoots a terrorist that is running towards a check point with a bomb strapped to him in the head and the terrorist dies before ever harming anyone is not an effective way to stop the terrorist?

If a terrorist did that, then Israel declared war on the terrorist's country and started attacking their cities, then no, that doesn't stop the terrorists. 

Besides, I didn't say "violence won't stop a terrorist", obviusly it will.  I said it won't stop terrorism, which is completely different.  You can kill one, but more will take his place.

Not if you kill them all

Read the line carefully, "You can kill one, but more will take his place". 

For bonus marks, explain how you could kill them all.

[CrAz3D]

Oh yeah, so if an Israeli soldier shoots a terrorist that is running towards a check point with a bomb strapped to him in the head and the terrorist dies before ever harming anyone is not an effective way to stop the terrorist?

If a terrorist did that, then Israel declared war on the terrorist's country and started attacking their cities, then no, that doesn't stop the terrorists. 

Besides, I didn't say "violence won't stop a terrorist", obviusly it will.  I said it won't stop terrorism, which is completely different.  You can kill one, but more will take his place.

Not if you kill them all

Read the line carefully, "You can kill one, but more will take his place". 

For bonus marks, explain how you could kill them all.

I suppose you couldn't kill "them all" because there would be some here too...BUT, since those that are here ARE here we could control them much easier.
To eliminate 'them all' we could simply destroy the entire middle east

[dx]

The prisoners released were all a "coincidence" as the news stated here. Hmm, interesting.