vL on wikipedia

[Ender]

I'm not sure if this is a wideknown fact, but I searched this site for a similar topic as the one I'm creating, and couldn't find one. So here it is, vL on wikipedia! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Valhalla_legends

I looked up other bnet clans on wikipedia, and didn't find many. I find it kinda cool that vl's on wikipedia. And any of us can add to it! (I mean for the better, not for the worse.) I wonder who first put vL on wikipedia and who edited it (I didn't do any edits).

[Spht]

Since there's Korean in there, it was probably Sargera.  He seems to enjoy writing Korean on English documents.

[QwertyMonster]

EDIT:

Got on it now! Lol.

[UserLoser]

Since there's Korean in there, it was probably Sargera.  He seems to enjoy writing Korean on English documents.

Probably.  I don't think there's that many other people obsessed.

[Blaze]

Heh, theres a BNLS entry too.

[Joe[x86]]

That is a horrible resource. Aparently, the entire clan updates BNLS, which is actually done by UserLoser, who despite regularing these forums, is not a member. Also, the clan itself did not document the BNCS protocol, but Arta and Skywing did.

This informative post was brought to you by High King Jojo. =)

[dx]

Since there's Korean in there, it was probably Sargera.  He seems to enjoy writing Korean on English documents.

Probably.  I don't think there's that many other people obsessed.

See: Joe. (He's full of vL factoids)

[Zorm]

That is a horrible resource. Aparently, the entire clan updates BNLS, which is actually done by UserLoser, who despite regularing these forums, is not a member. Also, the clan itself did not document the BNCS protocol, but Arta and Skywing did.

This informative post was brought to you by High King Jojo. =)

Actually, BNLS was originally maintained by Skywing, Yoni, and Spht. Userloser just so happens to maintain version updates now. Documentation of the BNCS protocol predates vL; however, Bnetdocs is infact Arta's creation with contributions from Skywing and I suspect Adron played atleast some part.

Also if you care to read the rules page you'll see that things belong to their original creator and not the clan so proclaiming something to be the clan's is plain wrong.

[Newby]

Since there's Korean in there, it was probably Sargera.  He seems to enjoy writing Korean on English documents.

There wasn't any Korean writing in it this morning.

[iago]

Since there's Korean in there, it was probably Sargera.  He seems to enjoy writing Korean on English documents.

Probably.  I don't think there's that many other people obsessed.

Nope, pretty much just him and you.  And since you haven't taken credit..

[Zorm]

You know whats great about wikipedia? It has a history so you can see who created it. It gives the IP 69.196.167.105, someone should go look it up and figure out who it is.

[Mephisto]

Since there's Korean in there, it was probably Sargera.  He seems to enjoy writing Korean on English documents.

Probably.  I don't think there's that many other people obsessed.

Ugh...I don't even know where to begin how pathetically stupid it is that you people continue to point out the most insignificant things and make a discussion about them.

[Kp]

You know whats great about wikipedia? It has a history so you can see who created it. It gives the IP 69.196.167.105, someone should go look it up and figure out who it is.

Since the forum administrators can see everyone's IP address, the most expedient approach would be to get one of them worked up enough to care about identifying this mystery poster.

[effect]

Or you could just go outside for the first time in your life and not even care who put your lame clan on wikipedia.

[Kp]

Or you could just go outside for the first time in your life and not even care who put your lame clan on wikipedia.

Sadly, I must go outside every day.  It's terrible and bright, except when water falls from the sky.  The temperature changes wildly and uncontrollably, and there are people out there who insist on making eye contact.  I don't like the world outside.

The fact that we're joking about this instead of fingering the perpetrator says we really don't care enough to put much effort into finding whoever posted about us.  Why should we?  They couldn't even be bothered to write a full (non-stub) article!