• Welcome to Valhalla Legends Archive.
 

Hello....

Started by Celica, December 27, 2002, 04:56 PM

Previous topic - Next topic
Print
|
Go Down Pages1 2
User actions

Celica

December 27, 2002, 04:56 PM
Hello, I am new to "Bot" development. What's the best hashing method for a Visual Basic 6.0 Professional "Bot"?  ;D

Celica

#1
December 27, 2002, 05:20 PM Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00 PM by 1048312800
You got aim? We can work together...  :P

UserLoser

#2
December 27, 2002, 05:22 PM Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00 PM by 1048312800
Si, just use the AIM icon on the left, under my username and post amount ;)

iago

#3
December 30, 2002, 11:09 PM Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00 PM by 1048312800
QuoteBNLS
http://www.valhallalegends.com/yoni/BNLSProtocolSpec.txt

He said BEST method, not EASIEST! :-P
This'll make an interesting test for broken AV:
QuoteX5O!P%@AP[4\PZX54(P^)7CC)7}$EICAR-STANDARD-ANTIVIRUS-TEST-FILE!$H+H*

Etheran

#4
December 31, 2002, 12:53 AM
How are you going to prove that it's not the best method? :P

iago

#5
December 31, 2002, 09:39 AM Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00 PM by 1048312800
Quotehas anyone created a bot that does not use BNLS and can log in under warcraft III? besides binarychat?

I don't think anybody has reversed the War3 login except Skywing and friends, but I could be wrong.
This'll make an interesting test for broken AV:
QuoteX5O!P%@AP[4\PZX54(P^)7CC)7}$EICAR-STANDARD-ANTIVIRUS-TEST-FILE!$H+H*

l)ragon

#6
December 31, 2002, 11:18 AM Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00 PM by 1048312800
Quotehas anyone created a bot that does not use BNLS and can log in under warcraft III? besides binarychat?

If you consider connection hijacking a bot then I sopose I have one aswell.

~l)ragon
*^~·.,¸¸,.·´¯`·.,¸¸,.-·~^*ˆ¨¯¯¨ˆ*^~·.,l)ragon,.-·~^*ˆ¨¯¯¨ˆ*^~·.,¸¸,.·´¯`·.,¸¸,.-·~^*

Yoni

#7
December 31, 2002, 12:21 PM
If you have or know of a bot that logs on Warcraft 3, isn't BinaryChat, doesn't use BNLS, and doesn't hijack the real Warcraft 3 client's connection, I'd like to know about it. :P

Skywing

#8
December 31, 2002, 10:13 PM Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00 PM by 1048312800
QuoteIf you consider connection hijacking a bot then I sopose I have one aswell.

~l)ragon
How about one which doesn't require clientside modifications? :P

Etheran

#9
December 31, 2002, 10:20 PM Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00 PM by 1048312800
Skywing and Yoni have a monopoly going on here!

l)ragon

#10
December 31, 2002, 10:26 PM Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00 PM by 1048312800
QuoteHow about one which doesn't require clientside modifications? :P

8(
*^~·.,¸¸,.·´¯`·.,¸¸,.-·~^*ˆ¨¯¯¨ˆ*^~·.,l)ragon,.-·~^*ˆ¨¯¯¨ˆ*^~·.,¸¸,.·´¯`·.,¸¸,.-·~^*

Yoni

#11
January 01, 2003, 07:43 AM Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00 PM by 1048312800
QuoteSkywing and Yoni have a monopoly going on here!
Yeah, and you all fear

iago

#12
January 01, 2003, 09:27 AM Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00 PM by 1048312800
See what the problem with monopolies is?  BNLS goes down and nobody can log in! :-)
This'll make an interesting test for broken AV:
QuoteX5O!P%@AP[4\PZX54(P^)7CC)7}$EICAR-STANDARD-ANTIVIRUS-TEST-FILE!$H+H*

Skywing

#13
January 01, 2003, 02:29 PM
QuoteSee what the problem with monopolies is?  BNLS goes down and nobody can log in! :-)
BNLS has an excellent uptime track record.  You should see what people will put up with; check the BG3 forums (linked at http://www.ultimatebot.com).  I was testing how strong their copy protection was, and their authserver went down at least 6 times overnight (and their program disconnects from Battle.net if it can't contact the authserver).

Before you start criticizing BNLS, look at the alternatives (and there are none for Warcraft III!).  :P

MiLF

#14
January 01, 2003, 04:22 PM Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00 PM by 1048312800
even when i've gotten messages saying BNLS is going down, it doesn't cause the bot to disconnect. BNLS has been incredibly reliable.
Print
|
Go Up Pages1 2
User actions