SCGP Client (VB6 Open Source)

[MysT_DooM]

goobers

[Ringo]

Added in an edit... That's why I didn't see it.

That edit a few mins after posting, was infact to correct some pretty bad spelling errors. But nice try

Fine... But I'm still using DLLs in my bot (whenever I get another version done). It makes it so much easier to update a single component rather than the entire thing.

I don't think you get it, do you?
Doing that, is no issue. How ever, doing that then releaseing the DLL for the mass', just contributes to abuse on battle.net.
Let me educate you.
On battle.net, theres still people who acutaly play battle.net games.. It's crazzy, eh?
Infact theres 100's of 1000's online and playing at any given time.
When alot of these people are not ingame on battle.net, they are in a thing called a battle.net chat channel. Neat, eh?
Anyway, alot of them like to make online friends, ask other people for games, and make clans etc etc.
The last thing any of them want, is some kid who doesn't get bored of flooding/spamming their channels, because they are to dumb or find somthing else better to do with their time.
I couldnt' care less about the spam, since it doesn't effect me. None the less, I respect 100's of 1000's of players who acutaly legity use battle.net still, and have no repesct for the hand full of kids who think its cool and fun to screw it up for other players. 

[Barabajagal]

I dunno then... Maybe I just skipped over that part of the post.

And in case you hadn't noticed, I don't really respect anyone or anything, nor do I expect any respect in return. I don't see the point in it. Information should be free, regardless of the repercussions. I don't care if you agree or disagree with that. When I started writing battle.net bots (and even now), I didn't want anything to do with the reversing process, nor even handling packets. My interest has always been in the application itself, and how well it does at whatever its purpose is. If that happens to be massloading or flooding, so be it.

[xpeh]

Partially agree with Andy.

If some1 wanna to do something that you don't like, but is possible, he will made it, w/o asking your opinion.

As for me, working with protocol is interesting. Reversing sux.

[Mystical]

Partially agree with Andy.

If some1 wanna to do something that you don't like, but is possible, he will made it, w/o asking your opinion.

As for me, working with protocol is interesting. Reversing sux.

i don't think that applies to taking someone elses working code modifing it and releasing it into a public distributed dl for all to use, specially even if he did release the source public, he put work and time into it to make it much harder for anyone to jack

[xpeh]

Does it violate any license?

[Ringo]

I dunno then... Maybe I just skipped over that part of the post.

none the less, it kind of went with out saying, unless, you lack any form of common sence.

And in case you hadn't noticed, I don't really respect anyone or anything, nor do I expect any respect in return. I don't see the point in it. Information should be free, regardless of the repercussions. I don't care if you agree or disagree with that.

Right, so you don't respect anyone or anything, but you respect peoples right to free infomation.
Just listen to you're self for 5min.
Incase you haven't noticed, This topic is all about free infomation, on both SCGP, and warden.
The infomation is free for people to use and learn from.
Just becasue you lack any self respect, doesn't mean you should ignore peoples right to use battle.net with out having to put up with abuseing little kids like nes.
Common man, find that thing you call a brain, and use it.
No wunder the world sucks, with morons like you and with logic like that.

Does it violate any license?

Yes. Common sence.

[xpeh]

Does it violate any license?

Yes. Common sence.

Wow, didn't know. What type of license is it?

Why are you so sure, that noone else can write it on his own?

Btw what are you talking about?

[Ringo]

Does it violate any license?

Yes. Common sence.

Wow, didn't know. What type of license is it?

Why are you so sure, that noone else can write it on his own?

Btw what are you talking about?

[Mystical]

Does it violate any license?

Yes. Common sence.

Wow, didn't know. What type of license is it?

Why are you so sure, that noone else can write it on his own?

Btw what are you talking about?

I don't think you should be talking if you didn't read the forums.

and i believe this should be in all in respect.

[xpeh]

Sry, but i didn't read all 10 pages, most of them flood, in all respect

[Hdx]

Sry, but i didn't read all 10 pages, most of them flood, in all respect

The cause of alot of that is Andy releasing his warden dll then NES begging for help on how to use it in his flood bot. Then thinking hes 1337 and badass because he is flooding again.

Basically, Andy, Don't release DLLs. That should be the end of it.
Ringo, Keep up the good work, Posting docs and maybe psudocode.

Aside form that everyone else shut it and someone perma ban nes?
its more then easy to completely block ips and proxys from the forum.

[Barabajagal]

And here I was thinking the world sucks because the people who do use their brains take all the resources they can from those who don't, or are under some misguided pretense that they can improve the human race by removing it from nature. Thinking does much worse than not thinking ever will.

@xeph: My first DLL was my own code; this recent version is basically a rip and a wrapper, since it's impossible to emulate warden without using assembly, and when I tried to do it in PB, it refused to work.

[xpeh]

Andy, please write my nick properly.

[xpeh]

Doing that, is no issue. How ever, doing that then releaseing the DLL for the mass', just contributes to abuse on battle.net.

Is it the thing you don't agree, releasing fot the mass'?