• Welcome to Valhalla Legends Archive.
 

Better way to do this?

Started by Barabajagal, September 08, 2007, 02:24 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

brew

#45
Quote from: brew on September 14, 2007, 02:31 PMThough, being that you say you could create things like RichEdit boxes in C++ about a year ago, I find it funny how you still don't know how to use debugging tools in C++. :-\
Simple. I don't make a mistake. If I do happen to make a mistake, then I review the code I believe to be at fault. When I find the problem, and usually I do, I fix it. Nothing more. The only time I've ever had to actually debug, is when I had that nasty sprintf problem (my value was -1 and it was converted from an unsigned char to a long, therefore overflowing my buffer, i had to just add a cast to an unsigned char (even though it was declared that from the beginning)).
<3 Zorm
Quote[01:08:05 AM] <@Zorm> haha, me get pussy? don't kid yourself quik
Scio te esse, sed quid sumne? :P

Explicit

Quote from: brew on September 14, 2007, 07:19 PM
Quote from: brew on September 14, 2007, 02:31 PMThough, being that you say you could create things like RichEdit boxes in C++ about a year ago, I find it funny how you still don't know how to use debugging tools in C++. :-\
Simple. I don't make a mistake.

I'm sorry, but LOL!

Gone off-topic, anyway.
I'm awake in the infinite cold.

[13:41:45]<@Fapiko> Why is TehUser asking for wang pictures?
[13:42:03]<@TehUser> I wasn't asking for wang pictures, I was looking at them.
[13:47:40]<@TehUser> Mine's fairly short.

brew

Quote from: Explicit[nK] on September 14, 2007, 10:17 PM
Quote from: brew on September 14, 2007, 07:19 PM
Simple. I don't make a mistake.
I'm sorry, but LOL!
Gone off-topic, anyway.

Quote from: brew on September 14, 2007, 07:19 PM
If I do happen to make a mistake, then I review the code I believe to be at fault. When I find the problem, and usually I do, I fix it.
<3 Zorm
Quote[01:08:05 AM] <@Zorm> haha, me get pussy? don't kid yourself quik
Scio te esse, sed quid sumne? :P

Explicit

Quote from: brew on September 15, 2007, 09:14 AM
Quote from: Explicit[nK] on September 14, 2007, 10:17 PM
Quote from: brew on September 14, 2007, 07:19 PM
Simple. I don't make a mistake.
I'm sorry, but LOL!
Gone off-topic, anyway.

Quote from: brew on September 14, 2007, 07:19 PM
If I do happen to make a mistake, then I review the code I believe to be at fault. When I find the problem, and usually I do, I fix it.

LOL x2!
I'm awake in the infinite cold.

[13:41:45]<@Fapiko> Why is TehUser asking for wang pictures?
[13:42:03]<@TehUser> I wasn't asking for wang pictures, I was looking at them.
[13:47:40]<@TehUser> Mine's fairly short.

brew

Name one time when I haven't.
<3 Zorm
Quote[01:08:05 AM] <@Zorm> haha, me get pussy? don't kid yourself quik
Scio te esse, sed quid sumne? :P

Barabajagal

Sooo.... Back on topic.
Should I make it automatically scroll to the bottom if the user sends text themselves, or should it stay scrolled up? I can see reasons for either way.

And if this topic keeps going the way you guys are taking it, I'll lock it -.-

warz

Generally, when you're faced with a decision that should be left up to the user, because it's entirely preferential, it's best to make this something alterable through a configuration setting.

Barabajagal

Most things are, but they confuse the user (and many users ignore all the settings altogether). What should the default be, then?

warz

Well, mirc's default is to preserve scroll bar positioning, even through text being sent or received. Like I said, it's all preference. You're writing the client - you decide.

Barabajagal

First, I need to find room for one more checkbox... My settings window is WAY overpopulated, and I've got other things I want to make optional, too. I suppose I'll make it scroll down on sending by default, since that's what the official clients do.

rabbit

Quote from: Andy on September 15, 2007, 10:19 PM
First, I need to find room for one more checkbox... My settings window is WAY overpopulated, and I've got other things I want to make optional, too. I suppose I'll make it scroll down on sending by default, since that's what the official clients do.
Tabs.
Grif: Yeah, and the people in the red states are mad because the people in the blue states are mean to them and want them to pay money for roads and schools instead of cool things like NASCAR and shotguns.  Also, there's something about ketchup in there.

Barabajagal

...I don't think you understand... My options window has nearly maxed out the number of elements allowed on a form in VB6.

My Options Window: http://realityripple.com/Uploads/Options

brew

Quote from: Andy on September 16, 2007, 12:23 AM
...I don't think you understand... My options window has nearly maxed out the number of elements allowed on a form in VB6.

My Options Window: http://realityripple.com/Uploads/Options


Oh wow, your client selection takes up 15x more controls then it should... I recommend using a ComboBoxEx.
<3 Zorm
Quote[01:08:05 AM] <@Zorm> haha, me get pussy? don't kid yourself quik
Scio te esse, sed quid sumne? :P

rabbit

Quote from: Andy on September 16, 2007, 12:23 AM
...I don't think you understand... My options window has nearly maxed out the number of elements allowed on a form in VB6.

My Options Window: http://realityripple.com/Uploads/Options

O god..not only is that totally inefficient, it's totally hideous!
Grif: Yeah, and the people in the red states are mad because the people in the blue states are mean to them and want them to pay money for roads and schools instead of cool things like NASCAR and shotguns.  Also, there's something about ketchup in there.

Barabajagal

I'm not gonna use a combo box! I love that layout for selecting clients. It looks much friendlier.

|