• Welcome to Valhalla Legends Archive.
 

Warden anti-hack is back..

Started by brew, August 29, 2007, 07:01 PM

Previous topic - Next topic
|

Barabajagal

Fail.

No duh someone who's experienced at reverse engineering can reverse engineer. You're saying nothing of any value or use, or even anything that isn't completely obvious!

devcode

#106
Being experienced at reverse-engineering does not necessarily mean it's practically possible to achieve a solution. Doing some analysis myself, I came to a conclusion that it was possible to achieve an optimal solution, and this conclusion is not trivial unless you go through some initial reversing. I think you should spend time getting a better website up as well as upgrading on that knowledge of yours (i was like LOLWUTAN00B when i saw you used VB) instead of writing replys to my statements.

Quote from: Andy on September 08, 2007, 05:36 PM
Fail.

No duh someone who's experienced at reverse engineering can reverse engineer. You're saying nothing of any value or use, or even anything that isn't completely obvious!

Barabajagal

"Getting" a better website? How many websites do you know that are 100% valid in all areas? How many do you know that were written entirely by one person in notepad and are 100% valid in all areas? Then you attack me via IM claiming I know nothing because my language of choice happens to be one you don't like. HOW FUCKING RETARDED CAN YOU GET?

devcode

#108
Really, kids should think before they talk.

RealityRipple ‎(7:00 PM):
i wouldn't use c for any programs
powerbasic > c
booyakasha ‎(7:01 PM):
lol
lol
see, thats what makes you dumb
RealityRipple ‎(7:01 PM):
what, because a superior language isn't well known, it's no good?

<Andy> OMG GUYZ POWERBASIC IZ LIKE TEH BEST THING EVURRR AND OMG WHY DIDNT THEY USEZ IT TO MAKE LINUX WTF? STUPID LINUZ. IM GUNNA GO MAKE AN OS FROM POWERBASIC FUX THIZ SHIT.

Inshort, EPIC FALE.

Barabajagal

Do you even know what PowerBASIC is?

warz

Quote from: Andy on September 08, 2007, 06:03 PMHow many websites do you know that are 100% valid in all areas? How many do you know that were written entirely by one person in notepad and are 100% valid in all areas?

It's not tough to write a simple website that passes as valid html. I would consider your site fairly simple, compared to other sites that achieve valid html, also. You're not the only person that uses a simple text editor for writing html, either. A majority of web developers use basic text editors for html, php, javascript, python, whatever.

Barabajagal

My site uses php, allows you to select from 6 CSS color schemes, and has a handful of other things (try clicking the arrow on the left of the footer bar to see what I mean). It makes use of getting (and formatting) file sizes for applications, is safe against the php include() exploit, and has many dynamic aspects you don't notice from looking at it.

Don Cullen

Quote from: devcode on September 08, 2007, 05:12 PM
But I clearly said in the post "For an experienced reverse-engineer/developer..." and I mentioned I hadn't got in-depth with this. I just said it was possible for someone who is experienced, nothing else. So, in essence, you fale.

Quote from: devcode on September 08, 2007, 12:51 PM
Emulate what Starcraft does for the 0x5E packet. KABEWM. ----->EZ.<----


Contradictory.

Also, it's fail, not fale. :P
Regards,
Don
-------

Don't wonder why people suddenly are hostile when you treat them the way they shouldn't be- it's called 'Mutual Respect'.

devcode

Can you tell me which two points are contradicting? You highlighted "EZ", what's the other one?

Quote from: Don Cullen on September 08, 2007, 07:34 PM
Quote from: devcode on September 08, 2007, 05:12 PM
But I clearly said in the post "For an experienced reverse-engineer/developer..." and I mentioned I hadn't got in-depth with this. I just said it was possible for someone who is experienced, nothing else. So, in essence, you fale.

Quote from: devcode on September 08, 2007, 12:51 PM
Emulate what Starcraft does for the 0x5E packet. KABEWM. ----->EZ.<----


Contradictory.

Also, it's fail, not fale. :P

brew

<3 Zorm
Quote[01:08:05 AM] <@Zorm> haha, me get pussy? don't kid yourself quik
Scio te esse, sed quid sumne? :P

Newby

God you're all fucking retarded.
- Newby

Quote[17:32:45] * xar sets mode: -oooooooooo algorithm ban chris cipher newby stdio TehUser tnarongi|away vursed warz
[17:32:54] * xar sets mode: +o newby
[17:32:58] <xar> new rule
[17:33:02] <xar> me and newby rule all

Quote<TehUser> Man, I can't get Xorg to work properly.  This sucks.
<torque> you should probably kill yourself
<TehUser> I think I will.  Thanks, torque.

Camel

Quote from: rabbit on September 06, 2007, 06:25 PM
Almost.

A class is also a type of object, but an algorithm isn't necessarily a program.

You misread my statement. I didn't say an algorithm is always a program; I said a program is an instance of an algorithm.

If you're a Java programmer, you may be confusing objects that are instances of the <Class> class. The definition of an object is an instance of a class, so your statement is simply incorrect.

References:
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/object
Quoteobject object-oriented
In object-oriented programming, an instance of the data structure and behaviour defined by the object's class. Each object has its own values for the instance variables of its class and can respond to the methods defined by its class.
For example, an object of the "Point" class might have instance variables "x" and "y" and might respond to the "plot" method by drawing a dot on the screen at those coordinates.
(2004-01-26)

Joe[x86]

Quote from: Dale on August 29, 2007, 09:27 PM
I don't know if this helps at all, but I'm trying.. I received this about 1 minute before being disconnected by warden


0000  00 18 f8 29 19 e9 00 18  f8 3f 4a b4 08 00 45 00   ...).... .?J...E.
0010  00 28 0a 2a 00 00 ff 06  5c 9f 3f f1 53 09 c0 a8   .(.*.... \.?.S...
0020  01 64 17 e0 0e de f1 33  94 94 00 00 00 00 50 04   .d.....3 ......P.
0030  00 00 ae 53 00 00                                  ...S..           


Does this happen over and over? That's an interestingly malformed SID_STARTVERSIONING.
Quote from: brew on April 25, 2007, 07:33 PM
that made me feel like a total idiot. this entire thing was useless.

iago

Quote from: Joex86] link=topic=16998.msg172550#msg172550 date=1189437466]
Quote from: Dale on August 29, 2007, 09:27 PM
I don't know if this helps at all, but I'm trying.. I received this about 1 minute before being disconnected by warden


0000  00 18 f8 29 19 e9 00 18  f8 3f 4a b4 08 00 45 00   ...).... .?J...E.
0010  00 28 0a 2a 00 00 ff 06  5c 9f 3f f1 53 09 c0 a8   .(.*.... \.?.S...
0020  01 64 17 e0 0e de f1 33  94 94 00 00 00 00 50 04   .d.....3 ......P.
0030  00 00 ae 53 00 00                                  ...S..           


Does this happen over and over? That's an interestingly malformed SID_STARTVERSIONING.

I could be wrong, but that just looks like a TCP header to me, no actual packet data.
This'll make an interesting test for broken AV:
QuoteX5O!P%@AP[4\PZX54(P^)7CC)7}$EICAR-STANDARD-ANTIVIRUS-TEST-FILE!$H+H*


Joe[x86]

Nevermind, you're right. I started reading at 0x16 instead of 0x36. That's what I get for trying to understand things in the morning.
Quote from: brew on April 25, 2007, 07:33 PM
that made me feel like a total idiot. this entire thing was useless.

|