Re: BNCSutil 1.3.1

[Joe[x86]]

Conversation with Topaz on 12/1/2006 11:34:39 PM:
(23:34:40) [x86] Joe: http://bash.org/?239870
(23:34:46) [x86] Joe: you should try that.

[Kp]

x86] link=topic=16095.msg162083#msg162083 date=1165041009]

I suppose someone could put together a shim that exposes the BNCSUtil interface and calls BNLS for its backend work.

I would have thought that throughout this time, if one person had gotten the idea right, it would be you, Kp. Don't encourage them.

As I interpret the postings here, all the people whining about wanting to use BNCSUtil are incapable of creating that shim, much less creating a freestanding (i.e. not BNLS backed) library for passing lockdown.  That's really pretty sad considering I spent ~5 minutes to make a command line BNLS client a week or so back, and it worked the first time.  Obviously, it is single threaded and blocking, but it proves that the basic concept is trivial to implement.

[l2k-Shadow]

x86] link=topic=16095.msg162083#msg162083 date=1165041009]

I suppose someone could put together a shim that exposes the BNCSUtil interface and calls BNLS for its backend work.

I would have thought that throughout this time, if one person had gotten the idea right, it would be you, Kp. Don't encourage them.

As I interpret the postings here, all the people whining about wanting to use BNCSUtil are incapable of creating that shim, much less creating a freestanding (i.e. not BNLS backed) library for passing lockdown.  That's really pretty sad considering I spent ~5 minutes to make a command line BNLS client a week or so back, and it worked the first time.  Obviously, it is single threaded and blocking, but it proves that the basic concept is trivial to implement.

Certain people would rather leech code then take the time to learn something, especially something so ridiculously simple. This proves that they are clearly not interested in being programmers so there is absolutely no need for them to get any help.

[Spilled]

x86] link=topic=16095.msg162083#msg162083 date=1165041009]

PS: Who ever is the author of BNCSutil.dll, get off your ass and fix it!

You have 23 posts and are telling people to get off their ass and fix things that a team of programmers has been working on for two weeks to no avail. You're either ignorant or an ass, but it's too early for me to tell.

I suppose someone could put together a shim that exposes the BNCSUtil interface and calls BNLS for its backend work.

I would have thought that throughout this time, if one person had gotten the idea right, it would be you, Kp. Don't encourage them.

Stfu and get a life Joe

PS:
Don't ever IM me again you worthless pile of lame

sincerely,
topaz

Whoa topaz, calm down.

Antarctica: BNCSUtil is useless as of now, except for hashing. You have two choices, Use BNLS or update BNCSUtil yourself because the author is now inactive and released the source public. Sorry =\

[Ersan]

except for hashing.

uh...

[l2k-Shadow]

except for hashing.

uh...

he meant hashing cdkey/pw

[Mystical]

x86] link=topic=16095.msg162083#msg162083 date=1165041009]

PS: Who ever is the author of BNCSutil.dll, get off your ass and fix it!

You have 23 posts and are telling people to get off their ass and fix things that a team of programmers has been working on for two weeks to no avail. You're either ignorant or an ass, but it's too early for me to tell.

I suppose someone could put together a shim that exposes the BNCSUtil interface and calls BNLS for its backend work.

I would have thought that throughout this time, if one person had gotten the idea right, it would be you, Kp. Don't encourage them.

Stfu and get a life Joe

PS:
Don't ever IM me again you worthless pile of lame

sincerely,
topaz

Whoa topaz, calm down.

topaz is in love =)

[Antarctica]

Sooo, does anyone have a working bncsutil.dll?  I don't know enough programming to fix it my self.   

[Ante]

no. i can't find the source code for bncsutil because the only site (that i found on google) that has it is down

[brew]

I have the source code to BNCSUtil, its a bit outdated though. And someone, please ban topaz. All she does is troll.

**edit i just realized i have the source to bnetauth, not bncsutil lol

[topaz]

I occasionally help people who deserve helping. You on the other hand don't have a single original thought in your head, as all of your posts have demonstrated

[Mystical]

I've got the source.

[brew]

It's not for MBNCSUtil, right?
Haha, and anyone who feels up to "patching" BnetAuth.dll, I have the source just PM me.
But mystical, hook me up man. I can't seem to find the source to bncsutil anywhere.

[Mystical]

Yeah I can hook it up, just hit me up or wait till i post it up on my server somewhere.

[brew]

Thx man