• Welcome to Valhalla Legends Archive.
 

Recycling: Waste of time?

Started by Networks, February 15, 2006, 05:45 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Networks

This is something that has long ailed me and I'd like to know what you think or can find.

Here are some resources against recycling:
http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=12816
http://www.wnyc.org/news/articles/54440
http://www.rightwingnews.com/reader/utterwaster.php


A few sites for it:

http://www.grinningplanet.com/2004/10-05/recycler-recycling-article.htm
http://www.bookrags.com/researchtopics/pollution/05.html


Please back up all and any of your statements with evidence. I'd like to see a debate on whether recycling is either effective or not effective.

CrAz3D

I think it is good to recycle somethings.

We recycle aluminum.  Other than retreating it (or w/e) I can see reusing aluminum as being much easier than harvesting new aluminum from the earth.
I spose the same could be said for whatever other metals are recyclable.
rebundance - having or being in excess of sheer stupidity
(ré-bun-dance)
Quote from: Spht on June 22, 2004, 07:32 PMSlap.
Quote from: Adron on January 28, 2005, 09:17 AMIn a way, I believe that religion is inherently evil, which includes Christianity. I'd also say Christianity is eviller than Buddhism (has more potential for evil).
Quote from: iago on April 19, 2005, 01:06 PM
CrAz3D's ... is too big vertically, at least, too big with ... iago ...

iago

I read once that recycling paper is a waste.  It uses more chemicals and is worse from the environment than making new paper.  Apparently, the trees for new paper are grown in farms, not cut down in the wilderness, so it's cheap and replenishable. 

Additionally, glass isn't recycled.  At least, not where I live.  It's separated from the other recyclables and thrown into a pile in the dump.  After talking to the recycling guy about that, I stopped recycling glass. 

I've also heard that almost everything else (except for aluminum) is more expensive to recycle, and in most cases it doesn't help the environment much. 

Finally, and I don't know if this is true, but apparently, the only study ever done on how beneficial recycling is was done by the owner of a recycling company.  There have allegedly been no real studies done on the benefits of recycling. 

I don't have any sources on any of that, that, though, it was a long time ago.  But give the idea that recycling isn't as great as it's cracked up to be a chance.  It's worth thinking about. 
This'll make an interesting test for broken AV:
QuoteX5O!P%@AP[4\PZX54(P^)7CC)7}$EICAR-STANDARD-ANTIVIRUS-TEST-FILE!$H+H*


Ishbar

Why not recycle the metal into an army of robots that kill people who liter? That'd be good for the enviroment!  ;D

Hostile

iago, you didn't mention plastic at all. Plastic is the bulk of what I recycle, some glass and cans too but mostly plastic.
- Hostile is sexy.

Networks

Quote from: iago on February 15, 2006, 06:24 PM
I read once that recycling paper is a waste.  It uses more chemicals and is worse from the environment than making new paper.  Apparently, the trees for new paper are grown in farms, not cut down in the wilderness, so it's cheap and replenishable. 

Additionally, glass isn't recycled.  At least, not where I live.  It's separated from the other recyclables and thrown into a pile in the dump.  After talking to the recycling guy about that, I stopped recycling glass. 

I've also heard that almost everything else (except for aluminum) is more expensive to recycle, and in most cases it doesn't help the environment much. 

Finally, and I don't know if this is true, but apparently, the only study ever done on how beneficial recycling is was done by the owner of a recycling company.  There have allegedly been no real studies done on the benefits of recycling. 

I don't have any sources on any of that, that, though, it was a long time ago.  But give the idea that recycling isn't as great as it's cracked up to be a chance.  It's worth thinking about. 


Are you saying recycling is a waste of time and money then? There has to be advantages, we all can't simply be so ignorant to spend this money just for the sake of it.

Hostile

Even if paper has little to no benefit, metal is almost definitly better recycled then mining new ore. Plastic I would think would definitly have to be worth it. Glass I was under the impression was recycled, I'm not sure if it is though, or to what benefit.
- Hostile is sexy.

CrAz3D

I can see paper being pointless to recycle, metal being very benefitial to recycle, and I have no idea about plastic.
rebundance - having or being in excess of sheer stupidity
(ré-bun-dance)
Quote from: Spht on June 22, 2004, 07:32 PMSlap.
Quote from: Adron on January 28, 2005, 09:17 AMIn a way, I believe that religion is inherently evil, which includes Christianity. I'd also say Christianity is eviller than Buddhism (has more potential for evil).
Quote from: iago on April 19, 2005, 01:06 PM
CrAz3D's ... is too big vertically, at least, too big with ... iago ...

iago

Quote from: Hostile on February 15, 2006, 08:08 PM
iago, you didn't mention plastic at all. Plastic is the bulk of what I recycle, some glass and cans too but mostly plastic.
I'm not sure about plastic, that's why I tip-toed around it. 

Quote from: Networks on February 15, 2006, 08:18 PM
Are you saying recycling is a waste of time and money then? There has to be advantages, we all can't simply be so ignorant to spend this money just for the sake of it.
Well, what I'm saying might sound like a conspiracy theory.  Person A discovered a market for himself.  He does studies, which "prove" that his service is required.  So he starts making a lot of noise about it, and eventually everybody in the country is using his service, and the government is paying him a ton of money for it.  Is it possible?  Yes.  Is it actually happening?  I have no evidence of it.  Just keep an open mind.  :)
This'll make an interesting test for broken AV:
QuoteX5O!P%@AP[4\PZX54(P^)7CC)7}$EICAR-STANDARD-ANTIVIRUS-TEST-FILE!$H+H*


DarkMinion

There is no one person reaping all the benefits of recycling, that's the most absurd thing I've ever heard.  There's a difference between keeping an open mind and believing every damn thing you hear.

iago

Quote from: DarkMinion on February 16, 2006, 01:19 PM
There is no one person reaping all the benefits of recycling, that's the most absurd thing I've ever heard.  There's a difference between keeping an open mind and believing every damn thing you hear.

There is obviously some company who does the majority of recycling, and they're funded by the government.  Obviously, the person who owns it is profitting.  I don't see how that fact can be debated..
This'll make an interesting test for broken AV:
QuoteX5O!P%@AP[4\PZX54(P^)7CC)7}$EICAR-STANDARD-ANTIVIRUS-TEST-FILE!$H+H*


Grok

Recycling is a good idea even if implemented wrongly or poorly. (not saying it is though, and not saying its not).  If we define recycling as a process that reduces waste, and reduces negative manufacturing affects on the environment, but taking disposable consumer products and transforming them for further uses.

Suggestion:  If we can agree recycling is theoretically a good idea, perhaps we should discover how to make it good and implement that in law.  By that I mean, if we discover certain plastics recycling is optimal, we could legislate that many consumer products be packaged in those plastics when possible.  This would enable recycling to truely make sense for both consumer and environment.

Thing [vL]

One of my largest clients is a privately owned recycling company.  There is a lot of profit being made in that industry regardless of whether or not private citizens recycle their waste or not.  They have plants scattered all over the south and they generally deal in large volumes of materials.  I mean large as in train loads, not a plastic bag full of your empty beer cans. For example, they have a contract with Texas Motor Speedway.  After every event they take all of the waste from the track, sort it out, and sell it on the market.  Recycled materials are treated as a commodity and bought and sold in bulk.  I can't comment on whether or not recycling is good for the environment, but I do know that recycling provides jobs for people and gives me a nice size network to manage.

Networks

So it seems that recycling is not ineffective but has the potential to be very costy and from a economic stand point is either worth while or worthless.

I wasn't sure if recycling was actually working or was really effective as a means to preserve materials that will one day become scarce, if not already, on the planet.
I 've heard something about how decomposing materials takes an extremely long amount of time however I've found no evidence that leads to such a conclusion. I'd like to hear from someone that thinks recycling is itself a waste. Is recycling really worthwhile or are we fine now and in the hopeful future?

Adron

Glass is recycled here; bottles are washed and reused; others are smelted and reused, though mixing of colored glass and clear glass creates problems and eventually they become isolators or filler for constructions or some other lower level product.

Trees for paper definitely do not grow in farms here. But we do export a lot of paper. And recycled paper is used plentifully, especially where completely white perfect paper isn't needed - print paper might have 5-20% recycled fibres while cardboard may consist of 85% recycled fibres.

Recycling aluminium is very advantageous because of the high power use when extracting aluminium from ore.

Then there is recycling electronics, where companies make a profit selling extracted metals.


And obviously there are different reasons for recycling different things. We are not running out of glass, but we don't want crushed glass spread around outdoors. Solution to that - make sure people return them.

Plus, mixing glass and similar substances with the rest of the garbage reduces the efficiency of the incinerators heating the city; only things that burn should be dumped into the regular garbage cans here.