Sheehan for Senate

[CrAz3D]

So why is it in this category?  It'd be better in the funny forum from your description of it.  I thought this forum was for mature and meaningful poltiical debate?  Not name/philisophy bashing arguments from biased people.

This topic is political.  I presented perfectly acceptable reasons as to why Sheehan running for office is a joke.  Of course, you won't refute those because you can't.

And believe me, most of the stuff that Grok & Co. have posted has been very immature.  All they have done is slung mud on the Bush administration, flinging hateful insults and the like, yet those threads endure without protest...hmmm...

Actually, there are quite a few protests (see posts from Invert, Crazed, HisMajesty, etc.).  And I was pointing out the blatant insults against Sheehan similar to what you describe against Bush in previous topics.  And if you took a moment to read my posts without assuming them as liberal garbage you would see that I agreed with you in the point worth discussing about, and made yet another mention of the unncessary use of language.

#1) Who the crap is Crazed?
#2) hismajesty/trust hasn't posted in this topic, WTF?
#3) How was I insulting her?*


*My posts in this thread regarding her:

Sheehan is the essence of a mentally disturbed leftist person.

She said "get our troops out of occupied New Orleans", is that not evidence she is somewhat disturbed?
The most militaristic like definition I found of occupy was:

To seize possession of and maintain control over by or as if by conquest.

Problems with "occupied NO":
-The USA already had control over NO
-You can't conquere something in your control

[Mephisto]

Here's a tip: Make your posts more coherent.

Here's another one: Understand when a post is directed to you and not.  Not only was it not directed at you, you missed the point of it and who I was referring to and what.

[CrAz3D]

Here's a tip: Make your posts more coherent.

Here's another one: Understand when a post is directed to you and not.  Not only was it not directed at you, you missed the point of it and who I was referring to and what.

Here's a few tips:
-If you don't want me to respond to your posts don't mention my name in it
-Stay on topic

[Mephisto]

Here's a tip: Make your posts more coherent.

Here's another one: Understand when a post is directed to you and not.  Not only was it not directed at you, you missed the point of it and who I was referring to and what.

Here's a few tips:
-If you don't want me to respond to your posts don't mention my name in it
-Stay on topic

I am on topic.  Your name was in there because I was referring to past posts.  It had nothing to do with this post.  Please read.

[Invert]

News
http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/01/31/D8FG2HV82.html

[CrAz3D]

Here's a tip: Make your posts more coherent.

Here's another one: Understand when a post is directed to you and not.  Not only was it not directed at you, you missed the point of it and who I was referring to and what.

That's on topic?...hmm
Doesn't look like it has to do w/Sheehan or the Senate.

News
http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/01/31/D8FG2HV82.html

WTF will this woman do next!?  Maybe she'll go over WAT left & then head to Iraq & join a terrorist organization & blow herself up, hm, that sounds nice, not likely, but nice.
Anyway, what does it take to have the courts admit someone to a psych ward?