State Senator verbally attacks Adult Parole Board Nominee

CrAz3D · January 20, 2006, 12:53 PM

Ok...they're in Santa Fe (New Mexico's capital) voting on former Sheriff Juan Hernandez's confirmation to the Adult Parole Board Mary Jane Garcia (Dona Ana) calls him demented.
WTF WOMAN!?

Lee Rawsom (Las Cruces) demanded an apology from her as he stood behind Hernandez for appointment (or w/e).

Garcia sent a statement to the Sun-News on thursday.
Also, she said "I reget my poor choice of wordss regarding Mr. Hernandez's condition...I should have said 'his dementia.'"

"Garcia asked that the ocus be on 'the true issue here: the fact that almost ont-third of the Senate stood with me in declaring Mr. Hernandez unfit to serve.'"
(He was approved by 2/3 majority)

Uhm, ok WTF woman...2/3 vote is what it takes to elect the president!...this dude is only up for the Adult Parole Board.
STFU & go eat some arsenic you ugly whore.

OOOPS, I MEANT to say "Please refrain yourself from speaking as your cause has been lost. Also, visit a plastic surgeon ASAP, thanks & goodbye"

Stealth · January 20, 2006, 01:22 PM

Quote from: CrAz3D on January 20, 2006, 12:53 PM
STFU & go eat some arsenic you ugly whore.

OOOPS, I MEANT to say "Please refrain yourself from speaking as your cause has been lost. Also, visit a plastic surgeon ASAP, thanks & goodbye"

Not that you're bitter...

CrAz3D · January 20, 2006, 01:28 PM

Quote from: Stealth on January 20, 2006, 01:22 PM
Quote from: CrAz3D on January 20, 2006, 12:53 PM
STFU & go eat some arsenic you ugly whore.

OOOPS, I MEANT to say "Please refrain yourself from speaking as your cause has been lost. Also, visit a plastic surgeon ASAP, thanks & goodbye"

Not that you're bitter...

She used to be the local probate judge...we had to go see her after my grandma died cause my grandma had never had her house put in her name after her husband died.
She wasn't the nicest ugly old lady I've ever seen

I cant find the picture online that is in the paper, but she looks like a clown w/all of her makeup

Grok · January 20, 2006, 02:11 PM

How can this topic possibly be of interest to anyone other than about 5 people?

Arta · January 20, 2006, 07:05 PM

Additionally:

Make substantive arguments, or don't bother. Attacking someone's appearence, rather than the substance of their argument, is a fallacy.

CrAz3D · January 20, 2006, 07:52 PM

Quote from: Arta[vL] on January 20, 2006, 07:05 PM
Additionally:

Make substantive arguments, or don't bother. Attacking someone's appearence, rather than the substance of their argument, is a fallacy.

I attacked both.
She is dumb for saying what she did about the 1/3 of the senate & she looks like a clown. I also said she wasn't nice.

I don't really think I was attacking her appearance either, I just said she looked like a clown cause she was wearing so much make-up, that is an observation

Arta · January 21, 2006, 08:13 AM

You called her an ugly whore:

Quote
go eat some arsenic you ugly whore.

Why attack both? Why make an ad hominem attack if the substance of her argument is such that it is unneccesary? Did you read that Wikipedia page?

The tone of debate around here would be vastly improved if people would stop employing such obvious fallacies in their arguments.

hismajesty · January 21, 2006, 08:40 AM

Quote from: Grok on January 20, 2006, 02:11 PM
How can this topic possibly be of interest to anyone other than about 5 people?

Your opinions are of no interest to me, but I still read them. Sometimes.

CrAz3D · January 21, 2006, 10:32 AM

Quote from: Arta[vL] on January 21, 2006, 08:13 AM
You called her an ugly whore:

Quote
go eat some arsenic you ugly whore.

Why attack both? Why make an ad hominem attack if the substance of her argument is such that it is unneccesary? Did you read that Wikipedia page?

The tone of debate around here would be vastly improved if people would stop employing such obvious fallacies in their arguments.

My retraction/restatement of that is in the same post.

Rule · January 22, 2006, 01:26 PM

Quote from: hismajesty[yL] on January 21, 2006, 08:40 AM
Quote from: Grok on January 20, 2006, 02:11 PM
How can this topic possibly be of interest to anyone other than about 5 people?

Your opinions are of no interest to me, but I still read them. Sometimes.

Quote from: hismajesty[yL] on August 01, 2004, 09:11 AM
Quote from: Grok on August 01, 2004, 09:01 AM
Edit: Not even going to bother with you.

Me? Why not? I'm always intrested in your political posts as I've learned a lot from them. $:-\$

Grok · January 23, 2006, 12:42 AM

Quote from: Rule on January 22, 2006, 01:26 PM
Quote from: hismajesty[yL] on January 21, 2006, 08:40 AM
Quote from: Grok on January 20, 2006, 02:11 PM
How can this topic possibly be of interest to anyone other than about 5 people?

Your opinions are of no interest to me, but I still read them. Sometimes.

Quote from: hismajesty[yL] on August 01, 2004, 09:11 AM
Quote from: Grok on August 01, 2004, 09:01 AM
Edit: Not even going to bother with you.

Me? Why not? I'm always intrested in your political posts as I've learned a lot from them. $:-\$

Owned by Rule.

Thank you ;p

hismajesty · January 23, 2006, 05:23 AM

Yes, look, that's from August of 2004. This is January of 2006.

Back then I thought you'd make informational topics, not just anti-Bush flamebait.

Mephisto · January 23, 2006, 08:42 AM

Quote from: hismajesty[yL] on January 23, 2006, 05:23 AM
Yes, look, that's from August of 2004. This is January of 2006.

Back then I thought you'd make informational topics, not just anti-Bush flamebait.

In my opinion, his posts are insightful and use examples of George Bush to make a point.

CrAz3D · January 23, 2006, 08:47 AM

I dunno, this topic title seems like a prime Grade-A example of flamebait.
"Another anti-Bush, anti-facism topic."

Rule · January 23, 2006, 10:34 AM

Quote from: hismajesty[yL] on January 23, 2006, 05:23 AM
Yes, look, that's from August of 2004. This is January of 2006.

Back then I thought you'd make informational topics, not just anti-Bush flamebait.

Looks to me like you're 'waffling'. Besides, doesn't look like you were talking about what would happen, you said you are always interested in his political posts, not that you will be interested in them. Face it, you've put your foot in your mouth, and it's pretty funny.