Request for Comments: BnetDocs Facelift

[Arta]

The fonts are intentional.

That colour for the comments box would make them darker than the background. I wanted it to be fairly subtle - I'll make it a bit darker and see how it looks.

[R.a.B.B.i.T]

Eh, uniform fonts make the entire thing flow better, at least in my opinion.

Ahh, a somewhat useless extra I just (for no reason) thought up would be a quick-jump box which you could type in the packet id/name and just load that page.

[NicoQwertyu]

I like it! I like it!  Did you make that small green logo yourself?

[Ringo]

Its very nice, good job Arta!
I think the best idea was the one you were saying about awhile back about having each protocol in its own coloum so the site would open alot faster.
If more documentation about other protocols is going on there, that would probly be the best idea, as each coloum could have its own 'Documents' section relating to the protocol it is under
As for the colors and fonts, there fine! nice and bright means nice and clear

Keep up the good work!

[Arta]

Eh, uniform fonts make the entire thing flow better, at least in my opinion.

Ahh, a somewhat useless extra I just (for no reason) thought up would be a quick-jump box which you could type in the packet id/name and just load that page.

You can do that with the search box. Perhaps a search box in the menu would be a good idea, though. The font in the menu is different because the main page's font looks crappy at 9pt. I'm bored of verdana for the content, though, so I want that as arial. They're similar enough

I like it! I like it!  Did you make that small green logo yourself?

No, that comes courtesy of Akamas. Thanks Akamas!

Its very nice, good job Arta!
I think the best idea was the one you were saying about awhile back about having each protocol in its own coloum so the site would open alot faster.
If more documentation about other protocols is going on there, that would probly be the best idea, as each coloum could have its own 'Documents' section relating to the protocol it is under

Not sure what you mean by different columns? Either way, I think this version is much quicker. I rewrote the menu code completely. When completed, the new site will still allow you to show/hide sections of the menu, so the speed improvement should be even greater. Multiple 'documents' sections could be good, but I don't think we have enough documents to fill more than one section

[Ringo]

Not sure what you mean by different columns? Either way, I think this version is much quicker. I rewrote the menu code completely. When completed, the new site will still allow you to show/hide sections of the menu, so the speed improvement should be even greater. Multiple 'documents' sections could be good, but I don't think we have enough documents to fill more than one section

Hmm, i think i remember seeing the site like this for a day or 2 when you were talking about it. (But with out the game stuff)


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Available Topics:

Navigation:
News
Search BnetDocs
Credits


Logon:
Username 
Password: 
   

Register
Lost Password? 

Battle.net Messages:

Battle.net UDP Client Messages:

UDP Game Messages:

W3GS Messages:

Realm Messages:

D2GS Messages:

Botnet Messages:

BNLS Messages:




And each column/menu was abit like this


Battle.net Messages:

Documents:
    Logon Sequences
    Battle.net Flags
    Battle.net's file transfer protocol (Version 1)
    Battle.net's file transfer protocol (Version 2)
    BNLS Checksum Algorithm
    Clan Message Codes
    Game Statstrings
    Icons.bni
    NLS/SRP Protocol
    Notational Conventions
    Platform & Product IDs
    Protocol Headers
    Sizes & Types
    User Statstrings
    Warcraft III Profile Requests


Consts for all messages: [pas cpp vb]

Battle.net Message Documents:
  [C>0x00]  SID_NULL
  [S>0x00]  SID_NULL
  [C>0x02]  SID_STOPADV
  [C>0x05]  SID_CLIENTID
  [S>0x05]  SID_CLIENTID
  ....



I think u were on to somthing there

[Arta]

Eh? That's how it is now.

[Ringo]

hm i might need to del my cookies or somthing

[R.a.B.B.i.T]

I'd also like to see an option to display logon sequences including BNLS (it gets annoying for me sometimes to cross reference everything).

Also, "vl" and "bnetdocs" are commands on yubnub...hrm...

[Arta]

I'd also like to see an option to display logon sequences including BNLS (it gets annoying for me sometimes to cross reference everything).

That's a really good idea. I'll put it on the list.

Also, "vl" and "bnetdocs" are commands on yubnub...hrm...

Neat! I wonder who did that. The site looks cool as well - *goes off to play*

[The-FooL]

Can you have the list on the left be a different frame or something of that nature?  Every time I click on a packet I don't want to have to scroll the window all the way to the bottom again to find the next packet.

[shout]

The awsome.

[Blaze]

I really like the new template now.  It looks clean, and its fast loading. 

[Joe[x86]]

Any ETA, Arta? Looks really nice.

[Topaz]

Green looks funny.