• Welcome to Valhalla Legends Archive.
 

Desktop War!

Started by Thing, January 08, 2004, 04:37 PM

Previous topic - Next topic
Print
|
Go Down Pages 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 19
User actions

hismajesty

#60
January 20, 2004, 10:37 AM
That's what I was thinking, he was just seeing the similar GUI programs.

Hostile

#61
January 27, 2004, 04:36 PM Last Edit: January 27, 2004, 04:36 PM by Hostile
- Hostile is sexy.

Zakath

#62
January 27, 2004, 06:31 PM
My desktop's and my laptop's backgrounds.
Quote from: iago on February 02, 2005, 03:07 PM
Yes, you can't have everybody...contributing to the main source repository.  That would be stupid and create chaos.

Opensource projects...would be dumb.

iago

#63
January 28, 2004, 08:50 AM
Quote from: Zakath on January 27, 2004, 06:31 PM
My desktop's and my laptop's backgrounds.

Why wouldn't you advertise a good brand of beer?
This'll make an interesting test for broken AV:
QuoteX5O!P%@AP[4\PZX54(P^)7CC)7}$EICAR-STANDARD-ANTIVIRUS-TEST-FILE!$H+H*

Hostile

#64
January 28, 2004, 11:40 AM
Yar Zakath, your wallpapers really suck. :P
- Hostile is sexy.

Hostile

#66
February 07, 2004, 01:24 AM
You need a bigger resolution, my friend.
Increased workspace == Increased productivity, its proven! :p
- Hostile is sexy.

iago

#67
February 07, 2004, 02:14 AM
Quote from: Hostile on February 07, 2004, 01:24 AM
You need a bigger resolution, my friend.
Increased workspace == Increased productivity, its proven! :p

ermm, it's linux.  it's 800x600x4 desktops = 3200x2400 pixels of productivity
This'll make an interesting test for broken AV:
QuoteX5O!P%@AP[4\PZX54(P^)7CC)7}$EICAR-STANDARD-ANTIVIRUS-TEST-FILE!$H+H*

Hostile

#68
February 07, 2004, 02:19 AM
Thats cheating, could do that with windows too. :p hmm hey then I would 1600x1200x4 yay I have 6400x4800, I win.
- Hostile is sexy.

iago

#69
February 07, 2004, 03:02 AM
Quote from: Hostile on February 07, 2004, 02:19 AM
Thats cheating, could do that with windows too. :p hmm hey then I would 1600x1200x4 yay I have 6400x4800, I win.

But do you? :P

Plus, you weren't talking about having the highest, you were talking about not having low res :P
This'll make an interesting test for broken AV:
QuoteX5O!P%@AP[4\PZX54(P^)7CC)7}$EICAR-STANDARD-ANTIVIRUS-TEST-FILE!$H+H*

Adron

#70
February 07, 2004, 05:57 AM
Quote from: iago on February 07, 2004, 02:14 AM
ermm, it's linux.  it's 800x600x4 desktops = 3200x2400 pixels of productivity

You're forgetting that it's actually 1600x1200.

Hostile

#71
February 07, 2004, 08:18 PM
meh, I don't understand wtf either of you just said :p
- Hostile is sexy.

Thing

#72
February 07, 2004, 09:40 PM Last Edit: February 07, 2004, 09:41 PM by Thing
Sooo since I can run 1600x1200x16(desktops), I am in the productivity lead?

./edit | adron.has.the.coolest.icon.names
That sucking sound you hear is my bandwidth.

Hostile

#73
February 08, 2004, 10:20 AM
I could probably load 16 as well, possibly more. On top of I could most definitly load atleast 4 more remote desktops, so with that, I surely have 32000x24000. So I must win, right? :P ::)
- Hostile is sexy.

iago

#74
February 08, 2004, 11:14 AM
Are we counting shell accounts?  Those should each be 1x1 :)
This'll make an interesting test for broken AV:
QuoteX5O!P%@AP[4\PZX54(P^)7CC)7}$EICAR-STANDARD-ANTIVIRUS-TEST-FILE!$H+H*

Print
|
Go Up Pages 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 19
User actions