• Welcome to Valhalla Legends Archive.
 

To those using NLS.dll:

Started by Adron, September 19, 2004, 04:56 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

iago

It's probably comparable to Blizzard's, which I'm told is considerably slower than public versions.
This'll make an interesting test for broken AV:
QuoteX5O!P%@AP[4\PZX54(P^)7CC)7}$EICAR-STANDARD-ANTIVIRUS-TEST-FILE!$H+H*


Skywing

#16
Quote from: iago on September 20, 2004, 04:10 PM
It's probably comparable to Blizzard's, which I'm told is considerably slower than public versions.
Actually, Blizzard's is far faster than any public (in source code form) CheckRevision implementation I know of.  Faster as in tens or hundreds of times faster.

K

Quote from: Skywing on September 20, 2004, 05:29 PM
Quote from: iago on September 20, 2004, 04:10 PM
It's probably comparable to Blizzard's, which I'm told is considerably slower than public versions.
Actually, Blizzard's is far faster than any public (in source code form) CheckRevision implementation I know of.  Faster as in tens or hundreds of times faster.

I think we're talking about their BigInteger class?

Skywing

Quote from: K on September 20, 2004, 05:58 PM
Quote from: Skywing on September 20, 2004, 05:29 PM
Quote from: iago on September 20, 2004, 04:10 PM
It's probably comparable to Blizzard's, which I'm told is considerably slower than public versions.
Actually, Blizzard's is far faster than any public (in source code form) CheckRevision implementation I know of.  Faster as in tens or hundreds of times faster.

I think we're talking about their BigInteger class?
Whoops.  Yes, in that case just about everything is faster than the version Blizzard uses.

dxoigmn

#19
Quote from: iago on September 19, 2004, 10:54 PM
Actually, if you read up on RSA and other Private Key Cryptography, you'll see a lot of similarities to SRP.

I thought RSA & SRP were forms of public key encryption?

Michael

Wow, I have been gone awhile been very busy with school and stuff come back to see there is a new .dll? What does it do? i have read up some on the forums and gather:
1. something to do with warcraft 3.
2. was stolen.
3. some moron now uses it.
4. it is used in bnls?

Not sure so please inform me so i can be up to date with current events

iago

Quote from: dxoigmn on September 20, 2004, 06:47 PM
Quote from: iago on September 19, 2004, 10:54 PM
Actually, if you read up on RSA and other Private Key Cryptography, you'll see a lot of similarities to SRP.

I thought RSA & SRP were forms of public key encryption?

Same thing.  It's "Private/Public Key" encryption :-P

Michael, all right except for 4.
This'll make an interesting test for broken AV:
QuoteX5O!P%@AP[4\PZX54(P^)7CC)7}$EICAR-STANDARD-ANTIVIRUS-TEST-FILE!$H+H*


dxoigmn

Quote from: iago on September 20, 2004, 10:21 PM
Same thing.  It's "Private/Public Key" encryption :-P

Lies!!!

Sorc.Polgara

#23
How exactly is code leaked?  I mean someone would have to hax your computer to get to it?

Or did someone you trust leak it...

HL2...

Adron

Quote from: bethra on September 21, 2004, 03:46 PM
How exactly is code leaked?  I mean someone would have to hax your computer to get to it?

Or did someone you trust leak it...

Reputedly, someone picked a bad password to protect their things.

l)ragon

Quote from: bethra on September 21, 2004, 03:46 PM
How exactly is code leaked?  I mean someone would have to hax your computer to get to it?

Or did someone you trust leak it...

HL2...

To switch your post around a bit which should answer your question.

How exactly are houses broken into.
*^~·.,¸¸,.·´¯`·.,¸¸,.-·~^*ˆ¨¯¯¨ˆ*^~·.,l)ragon,.-·~^*ˆ¨¯¯¨ˆ*^~·.,¸¸,.·´¯`·.,¸¸,.-·~^*

iago

It was on a friend's computer, who we won't bother naming right now.  But he went on vacation with VNC running, and a lousy password on it.  Many people knew his ip and the password, and any of them could have taken it.  It ended up in the hands of somebody called "gosugaming" who eventually used it to blackmail me into unbanning him from vL's channel.  Of course I didn't, so he released it, and now he has no blackmail material.

Anyway, most good people aren't using it, out of respect.  There is a Java version I wrote and released, and if people can work with that, then that's all the better.
This'll make an interesting test for broken AV:
QuoteX5O!P%@AP[4\PZX54(P^)7CC)7}$EICAR-STANDARD-ANTIVIRUS-TEST-FILE!$H+H*


Sorc.Polgara

#27
Quote from: iago on September 21, 2004, 04:10 PM
It was on a friend's computer, who we won't bother naming right now.  But he went on vacation with VNC running, and a lousy password on it.  Many people knew his ip and the password, and any of them could have taken it.  It ended up in the hands of somebody called "gosugaming" who eventually used it to blackmail me into unbanning him from vL's channel.  Of course I didn't, so he released it, and now he has no blackmail material.

Anyway, most good people aren't using it, out of respect.  There is a Java version I wrote and released, and if people can work with that, then that's all the better.

BOOOOOOO, omg.  I'm going to change all my passwords now... they are stupid... but then again, I don't have anything of value except my CDKeys and pr0n ^_^


Yeah, I wouldn't use NLS if I had it.  I've almost done the logon sequence!!!! yay.  I started it awhile ago and got frustrated so I stopped, but I just started up again and I'm getting the hang of it now.  Don't flame... I know... I'm noob...

Packet loggers help alot.  I'm using WEPro b/c it was alot easier for me to use... I mean I installed it and could easily figure out how to use it.    Ethereal is suppose to be better but I couldn't quit figure out all that settings stuff...

and also, what is the easier way, logging on with SHA-1 or WC3?

hismajesty

Quoteand also, what is the easier way, logging on with SHA-1 or WC3?

I don't think SHA-1 is a game client. :P

Sorc.Polgara

Quote from: hismajesty[yL] on September 21, 2004, 05:31 PM
Quoteand also, what is the easier way, logging on with SHA-1 or WC3?

I don't think SHA-1 is a game client. :P

well it represents a group of clients... the way they logon... I think.

|