What contributes to the 0x51 response 0x101 (Invalid Version) ? How can I stop this to pass the challenge?
it depends, are you locally hashing, or remotely hashing with BNLS?
EDIT: What Client?
Local hashing and just in general for any client.
sure hash files are correct?
Quote from: BaDDBLooD on September 27, 2004, 06:41 PM
sure hash files are correct?
Positive and the verbyte is 0x11. I have the client.
Quote from: Minus on September 27, 2004, 06:50 PM
Quote from: Networks on September 27, 2004, 06:46 PM
Quote from: BaDDBLooD on September 27, 2004, 06:41 PM
sure hash files are correct?
Positive and the verbyte is 0x11. I have the client.
Did it used to work? Sounds though, like you are having problems with W3 hashing, which in general isn't supported here :P. If it used to work, you probably screwed something up, if not, too bad.
Woops..*sigh* It's out..
I wanted to use it for my own private use =\ (I am really being honest)
Most people who know me know that I wouldn't public release (or private release) a bot with it. (I hope)
I thought I'd use it in a public release when ever stealth and sidoh ported it =\ (If they even went public with it )
Oh well.. I don't expect help... But w/e
I understand if you trash it.
Funny though how I got the same error with bnls when I noticed I sent the verbyte wrong and corrected it..I dunno.
Quote from: Networks on September 27, 2004, 06:53 PM
Quote from: Minus on September 27, 2004, 06:50 PM
Quote from: Networks on September 27, 2004, 06:46 PM
Quote from: BaDDBLooD on September 27, 2004, 06:41 PM
sure hash files are correct?
Positive and the verbyte is 0x11. I have the client.
Did it used to work? Sounds though, like you are having problems with W3 hashing, which in general isn't supported here :P. If it used to work, you probably screwed something up, if not, too bad.
Woops..*sigh* It's out..
I wanted to use it for my own private use =\ (I am really being honest)
Most people who know me know that I wouldn't public release (or private release) a bot with it. (I hope)
I thought I'd use it in a public release when ever stealth and sidoh ported it =\ (If they even went public with it )
Oh well.. I don't expect help... But w/e
I understand if you trash it.
Why would they port it to VB? It's already been mentioned here many times that it's already slow enough as it is, with Blizzards implementation
Quote from: UserLoser. on September 27, 2004, 06:56 PM
Quote from: Networks on September 27, 2004, 06:53 PM
Quote from: Minus on September 27, 2004, 06:50 PM
Quote from: Networks on September 27, 2004, 06:46 PM
Quote from: BaDDBLooD on September 27, 2004, 06:41 PM
sure hash files are correct?
Positive and the verbyte is 0x11. I have the client.
Did it used to work? Sounds though, like you are having problems with W3 hashing, which in general isn't supported here :P. If it used to work, you probably screwed something up, if not, too bad.
Woops..*sigh* It's out..
I wanted to use it for my own private use =\ (I am really being honest)
Most people who know me know that I wouldn't public release (or private release) a bot with it. (I hope)
I thought I'd use it in a public release when ever stealth and sidoh ported it =\ (If they even went public with it )
Oh well.. I don't expect help... But w/e
I understand if you trash it.
Why would they port it to VB? It's already been mentioned here many times that it's already slow enough as it is, with Blizzards implementation
Sidoh is to lazy to code a bot in C++?
AFAIK, Sidoh and Stealth wanted to port the Java version to VB because Stealth and Sidoh refuse to use the stolen code, and I don't think they want to have a DLL that people will just steal.
Quote from: Minus on September 27, 2004, 07:06 PM
AFAIK, Sidoh and Stealth wanted to port the Java version to VB because Stealth and Sidoh refuse to use the stolen code, and I don't think they want to have a DLL that people will just steal.
It's simply because it's not meant to be public other wise they may have used it (at least sidoh would've) but userloser didn't let him when he asked.
On a side note, has anybody actually *asked* the authors for permission to use their library? I believe *I* have received permission to use it and release it. They're pretty nice guys to talk to, and down-to-earth. You might just try *asking*.
Yes I have. Userloser told me no. I even asked for Sidoh and I got the same response.
You may use my Java library, if you would like.
UserLoser is probably the wrong person to ask, since the code isnt' really his, either. I'd ask Maddox, first, since it's his code in the .dll.
Quote from: iago on September 28, 2004, 12:04 PM
You may use my Java library, if you would like.
UserLoser is probably the wrong person to ask, since the code isnt' really his, either. I'd ask Maddox, first, since it's his code in the .dll.
Note it is *my* DLL, not anyone elses. The whole problem is they don't know how to use it in VB without my DLL
Quote from: UserLoser. on September 28, 2004, 02:11 PM
Quote from: iago on September 28, 2004, 12:04 PM
You may use my Java library, if you would like.
UserLoser is probably the wrong person to ask, since the code isnt' really his, either. I'd ask Maddox, first, since it's his code in the .dll.
Note it is *my* DLL, not anyone elses. The whole problem is they don't know how to use it in VB without my DLL
Your DLL is a derived work of non-public code. I don't know the laws, but I know that without Maddox and others, you wouldn't have been able to make it.
Quote from: iago on September 28, 2004, 04:24 PM
Quote from: UserLoser. on September 28, 2004, 02:11 PM
Quote from: iago on September 28, 2004, 12:04 PM
You may use my Java library, if you would like.
UserLoser is probably the wrong person to ask, since the code isnt' really his, either. I'd ask Maddox, first, since it's his code in the .dll.
Note it is *my* DLL, not anyone elses. The whole problem is they don't know how to use it in VB without my DLL
Your DLL is a derived work of non-public code. I don't know the laws, but I know that without Maddox and others, you wouldn't have been able to make it.
If you say so. That was then, this is now, don't start up this crap about what I can or can't do. Anyways, I don't care what people say, Camel and I was working on this anyways way before you got involved, and probably even before Madd0x even started working on it. How about this, his class is based off of the work on srp.stanford.edu, without it, you guys wouldn't have been able to do it? After all, I was the one who pointed it out that it used SRP. I don't know the laws, but I know that without Blizzard and other libraries, they wouldn't have been able to make it.
wow..Now who do I really ask? Should I ask each individual author and hope to get a response of yes from them all before I use it? I assumed userloser because of NLS.dll (I did know others had worked on it before hand).
Quote from: UserLoser. on September 28, 2004, 04:59 PM
Quote from: iago on September 28, 2004, 04:24 PM
Quote from: UserLoser. on September 28, 2004, 02:11 PM
Quote from: iago on September 28, 2004, 12:04 PM
You may use my Java library, if you would like.
UserLoser is probably the wrong person to ask, since the code isnt' really his, either. I'd ask Maddox, first, since it's his code in the .dll.
Note it is *my* DLL, not anyone elses. The whole problem is they don't know how to use it in VB without my DLL
Your DLL is a derived work of non-public code. I don't know the laws, but I know that without Maddox and others, you wouldn't have been able to make it.
If you say so. That was then, this is now, don't start up this crap about what I can or can't do. Anyways, I don't care what people say, Camel and I was working on this anyways way before you got involved, and probably even before Madd0x even started working on it. How about this, his class is based off of the work on srp.stanford.edu, without it, you guys wouldn't have been able to do it? After all, I was the one who pointed it out that it used SRP. I don't know the laws, but I know that without Blizzard and other libraries, they wouldn't have been able to make it.
There's a big difference between using public domain code (srp) and using closed code (nls).
But since you're trying to get into it, what did you actually DO on nls? Me, Maddox, and TheMinistered, and Telos did all the reversing that I know of. In fact, Maddox gave me shit that I gave you the code, he said I should have kept it between me and him.