Is BNLS ever going to update again? STAR, SEXP, WAR3, and W3XP are all out of date...
Mm, probably not. You have two choices: JBLS or local hashing. I use the second one personally. :)
Already do, and JBLS.org seems to have been taken over by x86...
Quote from: Ribose on May 04, 2008, 07:08 PM
Mm, probably not. You have two choices: JBLS or local hashing. I use the second one personally. :)
Yes, clearly you're the authority... ::)
Quote from: Andy on May 04, 2008, 05:46 PM
Is BNLS ever going to update again? STAR, SEXP, WAR3, and W3XP are all out of date...
[00:52:17] (BotNet) <To: BNLS64> patchhashfiles STAR STAR_IX86_1xx_1152.mpq
[00:52:51] (BotNet) <From: BNLS64> Filesize mismatch.
[00:53:57] (BotNet) <To: BNLS64> patchhashfiles STAR STAR_IX86_1151_1152.mpq
[00:53:57] (BotNet) <From: BNLS64> Checksum mismatch.
i tried, not sure why it's failing (doesn't make sense filesize/checksum mismatches, i just think BNLS doesn't check if the files from the MPQ have 0 set for those). Attempting to patch BNLS for War3 causes BNLS to crash and burn
BNLS should support somthing like binary upload and a botnet "/setver W3XP 0x16" command as a back up mesure.
I'm persionaly still useing CRDB, 350kbish for all clients seems to be better than any clunky local hashing or BNLS downtime/random invalid versions. It's abit of a pain in the ass come new patchs tho, but at the same time it's immune to any checkrevision updates.
Quote from: Ringo on May 05, 2008, 07:51 AM
BNLS should support somthing like binary upload and a botnet "/setver W3XP 0x16" command as a back up mesure.
I'm persionaly still useing CRDB, 350kbish for all clients seems to be better than any clunky local hashing or BNLS downtime/random invalid versions. It's abit of a pain in the ass come new patchs tho, but at the same time it's immune to any checkrevision updates.
[08:50:11] (BotNet) <To: BNLS64> vset STAR d1
[08:50:11] (BotNet) <From: BNLS64> STAR: 000000d1 => 000000d1
[08:50:18] (BotNet) <To: BNLS64> vlist
[08:50:18] (BotNet) <From: BNLS64> STAR d1 - SEXP d1 - W2BN 4f - D2DV 0b - D2XP 0b - JSTR a9 - WAR3 16 - W3XP 16
already done sir :p you have to set the ver byte individually, BNLS can't figure that out. not sure what's wrong with BNLS's patcher
Neat :)
Just need's to support uploading of binarys from those with authorization, to remotely bypass the patching process :P
I can't recall how long sky's BNLS has been out of date for SC/W3, seems like forever. :(
Quote from: MyndFyre[vL] on May 04, 2008, 11:41 PM
Quote from: Ribose on May 04, 2008, 07:08 PM
Mm, probably not. You have two choices: JBLS or local hashing. I use the second one personally. :)
Yes, clearly you're the authority... ::)
It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out BNLS is never up to date. I mean seriously, it's not up to date with the current WarCraft III version, and a new patch is already almost out (http://forum.valhallalegends.com/index.php?topic=17448.0)! :(
Quote from: Ringo on May 05, 2008, 11:38 AM
Neat :)
Just need's to support uploading of binarys from those with authorization, to remotely bypass the patching process :P
I can't recall how long sky's BNLS has been out of date for SC/W3, seems like forever. :(
Only yoni and skywing have access to do that, and iirc, although it would only require uploading the new game files, they haven't done it for a reason
Yay! Now it's down entirely!
Quote from: Andy on May 06, 2008, 07:08 PM
Yay! Now it's down entirely!
yeah, tried to patch war3 and it crashed.
Quote from: UserLoser on May 06, 2008, 09:21 PM
Quote from: Andy on May 06, 2008, 07:08 PM
Yay! Now it's down entirely!
yeah, tried to patch war3 and it crashed.
Even when you knew what happens when you try to patch war3?
Quote from: Spht on May 06, 2008, 10:09 PM
Quote from: UserLoser on May 06, 2008, 09:21 PM
Quote from: Andy on May 06, 2008, 07:08 PM
Yay! Now it's down entirely!
yeah, tried to patch war3 and it crashed.
Even when you knew what happens when you try to patch war3?
hoped maybe it was just a glitch in the 1.22 patch and the newest one (from westfall) would work :P
UL 2
BNLS 0
:P
Quote from: Andy on May 04, 2008, 07:22 PM
Already do, and JBLS.org seems to have been taken over by x86...
I already told you andy, I don't have a place to host my JBLS server anymore. So Ron is letting me use his.
Only problem is that he hasnt put it in startup and he likes to randomly reboot his server.
Though I never tested, wasnt BNLS updated for the latest SC? I thought it was only WC3
No, SC doesn't work. And you really need to find a more reliable server, methinks.
Quote from: Andy on May 07, 2008, 06:19 PM
No, SC doesn't work. And you really need to find a more reliable server, methinks.
/me agrees
Just checking, is BNLS back online now, only I can't get connected and just want to rule that out first...
Thanks,
vl's BNLS server is down atm, try using other BNLS servers, best off updating dragon bot for local hashing :P
Quote from: Andy on May 07, 2008, 06:19 PM
And you really need to find a more reliable server, methinks.
I think localhost has pretty good uptime. At least, I can always connect to it from my box.
Instead of complaining about a free service being down, perhaps you should run your own server?
Can't. Satellite internet blocks incoming connections. As I said before, I use local hashing personally.
My JBLS server (pyro.no-ip.biz) is almost always up and always up to date.
Quote from: Andy on May 10, 2008, 03:37 AM
Can't. Satellite internet blocks incoming connections. As I said before, I use local hashing personally.
Being on satellite never stopped me from hosting my own JBLS, should I be using a non-local hashing enabled bot.
But I agree, local hashing is the best option for anyone.
Which is why I made my bot download hashes automatically (so idiots could use local hashing).
i host one off my server clangdn.org for stats visit clangdn.org:81