BNLS updates?

[Barabajagal]

Is BNLS ever going to update again? STAR, SEXP, WAR3, and W3XP are all out of date...

[Ribose]

Mm, probably not. You have two choices: JBLS or local hashing. I use the second one personally.

[Barabajagal]

Already do, and JBLS.org seems to have been taken over by x86...

[MyndFyre]

Mm, probably not. You have two choices: JBLS or local hashing. I use the second one personally.

Yes, clearly you're the authority...

[UserLoser]

Is BNLS ever going to update again? STAR, SEXP, WAR3, and W3XP are all out of date...

[00:52:17] (BotNet) <To: BNLS64> patchhashfiles STAR STAR_IX86_1xx_1152.mpq
[00:52:51] (BotNet) <From: BNLS64> Filesize mismatch.
[00:53:57] (BotNet) <To: BNLS64> patchhashfiles STAR STAR_IX86_1151_1152.mpq
[00:53:57] (BotNet) <From: BNLS64> Checksum mismatch.

i tried, not sure why it's failing (doesn't make sense filesize/checksum mismatches, i just think BNLS doesn't check if the files from the MPQ have 0 set for those).  Attempting to patch BNLS for War3 causes BNLS to crash and burn

[Ringo]

BNLS should support somthing like binary upload and a botnet "/setver W3XP 0x16" command as a back up mesure.
I'm persionaly still useing CRDB, 350kbish for all clients seems to be better than any clunky local hashing or BNLS downtime/random invalid versions. It's abit of a pain in the ass come new patchs tho, but at the same time it's immune to any checkrevision updates.

[UserLoser]

BNLS should support somthing like binary upload and a botnet "/setver W3XP 0x16" command as a back up mesure.
I'm persionaly still useing CRDB, 350kbish for all clients seems to be better than any clunky local hashing or BNLS downtime/random invalid versions. It's abit of a pain in the ass come new patchs tho, but at the same time it's immune to any checkrevision updates.

[08:50:11] (BotNet) <To: BNLS64> vset STAR d1
[08:50:11] (BotNet) <From: BNLS64> STAR: 000000d1 => 000000d1
[08:50:18] (BotNet) <To: BNLS64> vlist
[08:50:18] (BotNet) <From: BNLS64> STAR d1 - SEXP d1 - W2BN 4f - D2DV 0b - D2XP 0b - JSTR a9 - WAR3 16 - W3XP 16

already done sir :p  you have to set the ver byte individually, BNLS can't figure that out.  not sure what's wrong with BNLS's patcher

[Ringo]

Neat
Just need's to support uploading of binarys from those with authorization, to remotely bypass the patching process
I can't recall how long sky's BNLS has been out of date for SC/W3, seems like forever.

[Ribose]

Mm, probably not. You have two choices: JBLS or local hashing. I use the second one personally.

Yes, clearly you're the authority...

It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out BNLS is never up to date. I mean seriously, it's not up to date with the current WarCraft III version, and a new patch is already almost out!

[Spht]

Neat
Just need's to support uploading of binarys from those with authorization, to remotely bypass the patching process
I can't recall how long sky's BNLS has been out of date for SC/W3, seems like forever.

Only yoni and skywing have access to do that, and iirc, although it would only require uploading the new game files, they haven't done it for a reason

[Barabajagal]

Yay! Now it's down entirely!

[UserLoser]

Yay! Now it's down entirely!

yeah, tried to patch war3 and it crashed.

[Spht]

Yay! Now it's down entirely!

yeah, tried to patch war3 and it crashed.

Even when you knew what happens when you try to patch war3?

[UserLoser]

Yay! Now it's down entirely!

yeah, tried to patch war3 and it crashed.

Even when you knew what happens when you try to patch war3?

hoped maybe it was just a glitch in the 1.22 patch and the newest one (from westfall) would work 

[Ringo]

UL 2
BNLS 0