Hey, does anyone have a good fix about the 'lockdown' mpq files recentely added to the StarCraft version check? I haven't seen an update for the BNCSutil.dll yet. I hope they put the fix in the BNCSutil.dll. Someone tell me what is needed to get online with StarCraft (other than BNLS).
Quote from: Antarctica on December 01, 2006, 11:29 AM
Hey, does anyone have a good fix about the 'lockdown' mpq files recentely added to the StarCraft version check?
Skywing does.
Well, I would surely like to know what it is. :-\ (Visual Basic 6, by the way)
Skywing isn't disclosing the information to the public.
No fair. Why can't he give us an updated version of BNCSutil.dll?? ;)
He isn't the author of BNCSUtil, plus I would be shocked if he even used BNCSUtil, as it has been rendered for the most part useless (?) for clients on lockdown.
True. :'(
PS: Who ever is the author of BNCSutil.dll, get off your ass and fix it!
Eric (The author of BNCSutil.dll) released ownership of the project to the public. The source code is available on the BNCSutil website. He no longer works on it so don't expect it to be fixed ;)
Antarctica, since you have such a pressing need to have this fixed, why do you not fix it yourself?
someone fix it PLS PlS PLS Pls pls plss :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'(
aw, cmon. :p
lmao...
I suppose someone could put together a shim that exposes the BNCSUtil interface and calls BNLS for its backend work. ;)
Quote from: Antarctica on December 01, 2006, 02:53 PM
PS: Who ever is the author of BNCSutil.dll, get off your ass and fix it!
You have 23 posts and are telling people to get off their ass and fix things that a team of programmers has been working on for two weeks to no avail. You're either ignorant or an ass, but it's too early for me to tell. :P
Quote from: Kp on December 01, 2006, 11:58 PM
I suppose someone could put together a shim that exposes the BNCSUtil interface and calls BNLS for its backend work. ;)
I would have thought that throughout this time, if one person had gotten the idea right, it would be you, Kp.
Don't encourage them.
Quote from: Joex86] link=topic=16095.msg162083#msg162083 date=1165041009]
Quote from: Antarctica on December 01, 2006, 02:53 PM
PS: Who ever is the author of BNCSutil.dll, get off your ass and fix it!
You have 23 posts and are telling people to get off their ass and fix things that a team of programmers has been working on for two weeks to no avail. You're either ignorant or an ass, but it's too early for me to tell. :P
Quote from: Kp on December 01, 2006, 11:58 PM
I suppose someone could put together a shim that exposes the BNCSUtil interface and calls BNLS for its backend work. ;)
I would have thought that throughout this time, if one person had gotten the idea right, it would be you, Kp. Don't encourage them.
Stfu and get a life Joe
PS:
Don't ever IM me again you worthless pile of lame
sincerely,
topaz
Conversation with Topaz on 12/1/2006 11:34:39 PM:
(23:34:40) [x86] Joe: http://bash.org/?239870
(23:34:46) [x86] Joe: you should try that.
Quote from: Joex86] link=topic=16095.msg162083#msg162083 date=1165041009]Quote from: Kp on December 01, 2006, 11:58 PMI suppose someone could put together a shim that exposes the BNCSUtil interface and calls BNLS for its backend work. ;)
I would have thought that throughout this time, if one person had gotten the idea right, it would be you, Kp. Don't encourage them.
As I interpret the postings here, all the people whining about wanting to use BNCSUtil are incapable of creating that shim, much less creating a freestanding (i.e. not BNLS backed) library for passing lockdown. That's really pretty sad considering I spent ~5 minutes to make a command line BNLS client a week or so back, and it worked the first time. Obviously, it is single threaded and blocking, but it proves that the basic concept is
trivial to implement.
Quote from: Kp on December 02, 2006, 12:11 PM
Quote from: Joex86] link=topic=16095.msg162083#msg162083 date=1165041009]Quote from: Kp on December 01, 2006, 11:58 PMI suppose someone could put together a shim that exposes the BNCSUtil interface and calls BNLS for its backend work. ;)
I would have thought that throughout this time, if one person had gotten the idea right, it would be you, Kp. Don't encourage them.
As I interpret the postings here, all the people whining about wanting to use BNCSUtil are incapable of creating that shim, much less creating a freestanding (i.e. not BNLS backed) library for passing lockdown. That's really pretty sad considering I spent ~5 minutes to make a command line BNLS client a week or so back, and it worked the first time. Obviously, it is single threaded and blocking, but it proves that the basic concept is trivial to implement.
Certain people would rather leech code then take the time to learn something, especially something so ridiculously simple. This proves that they are clearly not interested in being programmers so there is absolutely no need for them to get any help.
Quote from: topaz on December 02, 2006, 02:38 AM
Quote from: Joex86] link=topic=16095.msg162083#msg162083 date=1165041009]
Quote from: Antarctica on December 01, 2006, 02:53 PM
PS: Who ever is the author of BNCSutil.dll, get off your ass and fix it!
You have 23 posts and are telling people to get off their ass and fix things that a team of programmers has been working on for two weeks to no avail. You're either ignorant or an ass, but it's too early for me to tell. :P
Quote from: Kp on December 01, 2006, 11:58 PM
I suppose someone could put together a shim that exposes the BNCSUtil interface and calls BNLS for its backend work. ;)
I would have thought that throughout this time, if one person had gotten the idea right, it would be you, Kp. Don't encourage them.
Stfu and get a life Joe
PS:
Don't ever IM me again you worthless pile of lame
sincerely,
topaz
Whoa topaz, calm down.
Antarctica: BNCSUtil is useless as of now, except for hashing. You have two choices, Use BNLS or update BNCSUtil yourself because the author is now inactive and released the source public. Sorry =\
Quote from: Spilled on December 02, 2006, 06:25 PM
Quote from: topaz on December 02, 2006, 02:38 AM
Quote from: Joex86] link=topic=16095.msg162083#msg162083 date=1165041009]
Quote from: Antarctica on December 01, 2006, 02:53 PM
PS: Who ever is the author of BNCSutil.dll, get off your ass and fix it!
You have 23 posts and are telling people to get off their ass and fix things that a team of programmers has been working on for two weeks to no avail. You're either ignorant or an ass, but it's too early for me to tell. :P
Quote from: Kp on December 01, 2006, 11:58 PM
I suppose someone could put together a shim that exposes the BNCSUtil interface and calls BNLS for its backend work. ;)
I would have thought that throughout this time, if one person had gotten the idea right, it would be you, Kp. Don't encourage them.
Stfu and get a life Joe
PS:
Don't ever IM me again you worthless pile of lame
sincerely,
topaz
Whoa topaz, calm down.
topaz is in love =)
Sooo, does anyone have a working bncsutil.dll? I don't know enough programming to fix it my self. :(
no. i can't find the source code for bncsutil because the only site (that i found on google) that has it is down
I have the source code to BNCSUtil, its a bit outdated though. And someone, please ban topaz. All she does is troll.
**edit i just realized i have the source to bnetauth, not bncsutil lol
I occasionally help people who deserve helping. You on the other hand don't have a single original thought in your head, as all of your posts have demonstrated
I've got the source.
It's not for MBNCSUtil, right?
Haha, and anyone who feels up to "patching" BnetAuth.dll, I have the source just PM me.
But mystical, hook me up man. I can't seem to find the source to bncsutil anywhere.
Yeah I can hook it up, just hit me up or wait till i post it up on my server somewhere.
Thx man
http://www.jwkfs.net/archive.php?show=3