A problem, help plz

[EviL_MarinE]

;o well i was talking  to my old friend (Pro_User) and he sed "Scrap the BNLS idea" and then he spent about 1hr or so going through connecting to battle.net and it really helped! I then went to bed and came on this morning to find that he had built me a "noob proof" conenction to battle.net to help me! It has really made me learn alot so far!

+++++++++
Dont bother posting bk to this !

[Kp]

;o well i was talking  to my old friend (Pro_User) and he sed "Scrap the BNLS idea" and then he spent about 1hr or so going through connecting to battle.net and it really helped! I then went to bed and came on this morning to find that he had built me a "noob proof" conenction to battle.net to help me! It has really made me learn alot so far!

+++++++++
Dont bother posting bk to this !

I would hardly consider such a person "friend".  His action has deprived you of the learning that would come of actually accomplishing this.  On top of that, I rather doubt you've learned any debugging skill from all this.  Most people who solve their own problems at least learn a bit about debugging, and are better able to solve problems on their own the next time around.  What will you do the next time something breaks?

[Warrior]

Post here of course!

[LivedKrad]

I would presume an unhandled packet would be a packet that has not been handled. So, I would also venture a guess that the solution to this problem, would be to handle the packet. It is also by this train of logic that I would assume that you *do not* know how to parse/handle/cram up your ass such packets. Please correct me if wrong.

[EviL_MarinE]

+++++++++
Dont bother posting bk to this !

[/qoute]

LivedKrad, ...? -_-V

I just said in my post ive restarted and i dont need help anymore, and please do not say "i cant parse", Get your facts right

[LivedKrad]

So, your argument that you can indeed parse these packets is backed up by the fact that you received code someone else wrote? That makes absolutely no sense.

[Minux]

Why don't we test him? Of course, on BNET, so he can't look up the answers

[EviL_MarinE]

ok here is what im doing, to make it so you lot understand *sigh*

Pro_User gave me a working code that connects to bnet, i dled it.
I said that  i dont wanna "cheat" and steal code, he said:

"Use this code to learn on how to connect to bnet, users talking, and even try a creating game, and channel lists, then when you have learnt most of it then try it on your own"

This is my way of learning atm, and i have tbh learnt on how to connect to bnet and confident on doing it myself, but first i will finish the rest of..


Does this all explain it now?

[Soul Taker]

ok here is what im doing, to make it so you lot understand *sigh*

Pro_User gave me a working code that connects to bnet, i dled it.
I said that  i dont wanna "cheat" and steal code, he said:

"Use this code to learn on how to connect to bnet, users talking, and even try a creating game, and channel lists, then when you have learnt most of it then try it on your own"

This is my way of learning atm, and i have tbh learnt on how to connect to bnet and confident on doing it myself, but first i will finish the rest of..


Does this all explain it now?

Maybe... but I only speak English 

[LivedKrad]

I wasn't fishing for an explanation. If I wanted to know why you read from others' code to learn, then I'd ask you why you want to do things the wrong way. However, I was asking how you justified your argument on being able to parse/handle certain packets based on simply downloading another person's code.

[EviL_MarinE]

I dont, but i learn from it so i can ?

[Warrior]

Dont take this the wrong way but looking at other people's code ruins the feeling of acomplishment you get when you successfully logon. If I were you id learn from documentation, not examples aka ripped sources.

[LivedKrad]

Sufficing knowledge of the syntax may help also.

[Minux]

It is true that with Visual Basic, you can learn from sources. It is the only language it seems, that you can learn from viewing sources. HOWEVER, this route takes almost three times longer, and once you reach an intermediate level, you lack the knowledge which you should have learned along the way. You get into the habit of looking at other sources, and you are always asking for help, and expecting people just to give you the answer instead of learning it.

Edit: Also, there are alot of things like Bytes, Words, DWORDS, Longs, Single, Double etc..
That you only can associate with other's sources....and it takes a while to fully understand that without reading the proper documentation. Therefore my conclusion is, packet logs will seem like GREEK to you.

My opinion ~ Minus

[EviL_MarinE]

heh, Warrior is absolutey right, i didnt get the "feeling" when i got another persons code online

But now i have actaully learnt logging on to bnet and i am working on my own to do it, but as well as doing this i am working out channel view ect...

Yes i have a habit to look at other sources, but it will soon pass

thanks for pointing me into the right place, as now i dont copy

And i cant wait til >I< get a bot on >MYSELF< with >MY< coding :D

Since now i know how to logon to bnet i am capable doing it myself

thanks you lot