liberal = hypocrite?

[Hazard]

But Adron what you say makes no sense. Your entire theory is that we must only take out those who are directly responsible and only when they are already guilty of harming us. Thats the stupidest thing I've ever heard.

If you read my last post, how could you miss the emphasis I placed on making a good impression on their children? Holding hands and singing songs is can "win this war".

We kill 99.9% enemy combatants and .05% women and children.
They kill 100% innocent civillians.

I doubt that. They probably kill 75% innocent civilians and 25% defense contractors, people involved in military, infrastructure, economy, government, and other important strategical targets. Considering their tech level, it seems like a reasonable accuracy.

Thats funny, I don't recall any defense contractors and military personell in the towers.

[Banana fanna fo fanna]

2. Educate the people of the Middle East with a more neutral perspective, many of whom receive muslim fundamentalist teachings as part of their normal schooling.

Right on. I think something like an Islamic reformation would be a great thing for everyone involved.

And gosh durn it, those Iraqi kids sure hate us.

EDIT: fixed url

[Arta]

We kill 99.9% enemy combatants and .05% women and children.
They kill 100% innocent civillians.

Where did that thoroughly spurious statistic come from?

[TangoFour]

And the remaining .05%? Innocent men?

[muert0]

No NO the last .05% was Ronald McDonald and the gang.... I think hamburgaler was the only one that deserved it though.

[Adron]

Thats funny, I don't recall any defense contractors and military personell in the towers.

They hit the Pentagon too, and there's bound to be some people just walking around and happening to end up in that place at that time.

[Hazard]

Thats funny, I don't recall any defense contractors and military personell in the towers.

They hit the Pentagon too, and there's bound to be some people just walking around and happening to end up in that place at that time.

And what did they use? A hijacked military aircraft full of Army Rangers? No. A passanger liner full of innocent civillians.

[Hazard]

No NO the last .05% was Ronald McDonald and the gang.... I think hamburgaler was the only one that deserved it though.

Typical, avoid the topic by distracting from the original message to make a lame joke.

[TehUser]

Typical, avoid the topic by distracting from the original message to make a lame joke.

Typical, avoid a valid question (Arta's) by simply pretending it doesn't exist.

[Tuberload]

This whole debate is typical. One sided arguments with no attempt to understand what the other person is saying.

[Adron]

And what did they use? A hijacked military aircraft full of Army Rangers? No. A passanger liner full of innocent civillians.

Yeah, they were casualties of war. Considering the how much money they had to spend on their weapons, it seems they had a reasonable accuracy. And besides, most of them weren't innocent, they probably weren't muslims.

[Hazard]

We kill 99.9% enemy combatants and .05% women and children.
They kill 100% innocent civillians.

Where did that thoroughly spurious statistic come from?

Tomorrow if I have some extra free period's I'll calculate you some exact percentages. It was meant to be a figure of speech, I'm sure that even the British can understand that.

[Arta]

This whole debate is typical. One sided arguments with no attempt to understand what the other person is saying.

Yes indeed! That's why I stopped posting in it (mostly).