How fast...

Etheran · October 19, 2003, 11:03 PM

...Does it take the main forum page to load for you?

Quote
Page created in 0.284 seconds.

it's located on the bottom

Spht · October 19, 2003, 11:08 PM

Much the same. Shouldn't it be the same for everyone?...

Etheran · October 19, 2003, 11:10 PM

I don't know how the number is calculated. Perhaps you could show me?

iago · October 19, 2003, 11:24 PM

I would imagine that at the beginning and the end of the script the time is saved, then the later is subtracted from the former.

hismajesty · October 20, 2003, 02:28 PM

Quote from: Spht on October 19, 2003, 11:08 PM
Shouldn't it be the same for everyone?...

Not everyone has the same connection...I'm sure that would make a difference.

QuotePage created in 0.287 seconds.

Adron · October 20, 2003, 02:30 PM

Quote from: hismajesty on October 20, 2003, 02:28 PM
Quote from: Spht on October 19, 2003, 11:08 PM
Shouldn't it be the same for everyone?...

Not everyone has the same connection...I'm sure that would make a difference.

It shouldn't make any difference for a page that is small enough that the generation doesn't have to pause waiting for more buffer space to be available.

hismajesty · October 20, 2003, 04:05 PM

Quote from: Adron on October 20, 2003, 02:30 PM
Quote from: hismajesty on October 20, 2003, 02:28 PM
Quote from: Spht on October 19, 2003, 11:08 PM
Shouldn't it be the same for everyone?...

Not everyone has the same connection...I'm sure that would make a difference.

It shouldn't make any difference for a page that is small enough that the generation doesn't have to pause waiting for more buffer space to be available.

I would assume the loading time will have a difference in say a 14k and a OC3+.

iago · October 20, 2003, 04:14 PM

Quote from: hismajesty on October 20, 2003, 04:05 PM
Quote from: Adron on October 20, 2003, 02:30 PM
Quote from: hismajesty on October 20, 2003, 02:28 PM
Quote from: Spht on October 19, 2003, 11:08 PM
Shouldn't it be the same for everyone?...

Not everyone has the same connection...I'm sure that would make a difference.

It shouldn't make any difference for a page that is small enough that the generation doesn't have to pause waiting for more buffer space to be available.

I would assume the loading time will have a difference in say a 14k and a OC3+.

No, because it's not counting the time for getting the request and the time for sending the data, just from when it begins generating the html, reading the database, etc. till when it finishes all that.

The longer the thread/the more different users posting/the current server load will make it take longer, that's it.

Thing · October 20, 2003, 05:44 PM

iago got this one correct. 1000 points for you!
It was running around .6 to .7 seconds on the server I had it on before this one.

hismajesty · October 20, 2003, 07:26 PM

Quote from: iago on October 20, 2003, 04:14 PM
Quote from: hismajesty on October 20, 2003, 04:05 PM
Quote from: Adron on October 20, 2003, 02:30 PM
Quote from: hismajesty on October 20, 2003, 02:28 PM
Quote from: Spht on October 19, 2003, 11:08 PM
Shouldn't it be the same for everyone?...

Not everyone has the same connection...I'm sure that would make a difference.

It shouldn't make any difference for a page that is small enough that the generation doesn't have to pause waiting for more buffer space to be available.

I would assume the loading time will have a difference in say a 14k and a OC3+.

No, because it's not counting the time for getting the request and the time for sending the data, just from when it begins generating the html, reading the database, etc. till when it finishes all that.

The longer the thread/the more different users posting/the current server load will make it take longer, that's it.

Alright thanks for clearing that up.