psistorm-PMAC-XX.mpq

[l2k-Shadow]

Yep it's here, just got this logging onto 63.240.202.139:

Code Select Expand


                         ff 50 3f 00 00 00 00 00 57 9b  .. ....P?.....W.
0040   f4 59 5b b7 1b 00 00 73 25 e1 aa 03 c7 01 70 73  .Y[....s%.....ps
0050   69 73 74 6f 72 6d 2d 50 4d 41 43 2d 31 35 2e 6d  istorm-PMAC-15.m
0060   70 71 00 dd e5 af 6a c7 96 7e 45 90 07 0c 4c b0  pq....j..~E...L.
0070   2d 59 02 02 00                                   -Y...


EDIT: This also applies to XMAC, psistorm-XMAC-XX.mpq

[Warrior]

Blizz is really serious lmao

[Newby]

Aww. Now you'll have to find another kludge to fix your problems!

[Hdx]

Good job Blizzard, <3
I still wonder if anyone is working on lockdown :*( I'm trying my best but I can't get jack squat.
~-~(HDX)~-~

[Denial]

Code:
                         ff 50 3f 00 00 00 00 00 57 9b  .. ....P?.....W.
0040   f4 59 5b b7 1b 00 00 73 25 e1 aa 03 c7 01 70 73  .Y[....s%.....ps
0050   69 73 74 6f 72 6d 2d 50 4d 41 43 2d 31 35 2e 6d  istorm-PMAC-15.m
0060   70 71 00 dd e5 af 6a c7 96 7e 45 90 07 0c 4c b0  pq....j..~E...L.
0070   2d 59 02 02 00     





All of east is effected at the current moment as well as west they must have gotten it up to see how well it does for the weekend.

[Denial]

I think the best idea for starcraft client is to wrap around their .dll or we need to write a compatible implementation. I would suggest the first because the second method would be more time consuming. I doubt many of us care enough anyway.

[warz]

well, from looking at it, it might be easier to write your own implementation rather than call cr from lockdown, if you're good at converting asm to c. calling it from the provided lib takes some tricks. each method comes with its own set of problems, though.

[Denial]

I think most people are loosing intrest and bnls might be the only thing that will be in use within the next few months. For starcraft in general. Diablo II is still workable with hashes though it is what most people are using at the moment.

[Joe[x86]]

Oh boy, the psionic storm of antibot!

I only have five words to say about this:

Blizz is really serious lmao

[l)ragon]

IX86:
DSHR, has gone back to useing the regular dll's.

PMAC:
SSHR, didn't get the update and is still useing normal PMAC files.

[l2k-Shadow]

IX86:
DSHR, has gone back to useing the regular dll's.

PMAC:
SSHR, didn't get the update and is still useing normal PMAC files.

IX86 DSHR definitely still uses lockdown.

looks like they gave up on PMAC SSHR.. lmao @ packet log:

Code Select Expand


                         ff 06 35 00 00 05 f1 13 cb cb  ..kx....5.......
0040   c6 01 76 65 72 2d 50 4d 41 43 2d 30 2e 6d 70 71  ..ver-PMAC-0.mpq
0050   00 41 3d 30 20 42 3d 30 20 43 3d 30 20 34 20 41  .A=0 B=0 C=0 4 A
0060   3d 41 2b 53 20 43 3d 43 2b 41 00                 =A+S C=C+A.


[l)ragon]

IX86:
DSHR, has gone back to useing the regular dll's.

PMAC:
SSHR, didn't get the update and is still useing normal PMAC files.

IX86 DSHR definitely still uses lockdown.

looks like they gave up on PMAC SSHR.. lmao @ packet log:

Code Select Expand


                         ff 06 35 00 00 05 f1 13 cb cb  ..kx....5.......
0040   c6 01 76 65 72 2d 50 4d 41 43 2d 30 2e 6d 70 71  ..ver-PMAC-0.mpq
0050   00 41 3d 30 20 42 3d 30 20 43 3d 30 20 34 20 41  .A=0 B=0 C=0 4 A
0060   3d 41 2b 53 20 43 3d 43 2b 41 00                 =A+S C=C+A.


Must have just put it back on then because i got the old dll just befor i posted that.

[Ringo]

I think most people are loosing intrest and bnls might be the only thing that will be in use within the next few months. For starcraft in general. Diablo II is still workable with hashes though it is what most people are using at the moment.

If none releases a new local hashing dll, and skywing makes BNLS private, or closes it down all together, this will not stop some of us from being able to connect to bnet with effected clients.
One of my many *things to do*, is to create a BNLS type server that works with the method I devised/still useing.
Even tho it would only beable to handle 1 check revision every 1 - 2 seconds, its enough to get on battle.net for me and friends/trusted people.
Point being, where there is a will, there is away.

x86] link=topic=16043.msg161375#msg161375 date=1163916535]
Oh boy, the psionic storm of antibot!

Well, i think your counting chickens before they hatch
All effected clients so far, are UDP game based, and blizzard have no *controll* over ingame activitys, where as the uneffected clients such as D2/W3, all play across servers hosted by Blizzard and have anti hack systems inplace, such as the warden client

But hey, my hunch could be wrong, they could lock it down next week

[warz]

Why not now?

[rabbit]

I have finals soon, I need to study.  Also, I'm training my SSBM game.  I'm last place on my college's challenge board.  I got knocked out of 9th on Friday, but I was almost 5th!  So close... :\