• Welcome to Valhalla Legends Archive.
 

Questions on Booting up Linux

Started by Ender, April 12, 2006, 11:36 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Ender

I've got a string of questions related to booting up linux when partitioning your hard drive and getting a new hard drive are not options.

1) Does anyone know if the Anaconda installer for Red Hat Fedora Core 4 provides an interface for partitioning your hard drive during installation if it detects no partitions?
2) Are there any BIOS problems that I could run into if I booted knoppix from a CD and didn't install it on my hard drive?
3) Knoppix doesn't require reformatting the hard drive, does it? I'm almost positive it doesn't, as there is so much talk about booting knoppix on non-linux systems without having to do any preparation.
4) Can the same be done with Fedora Core 4 or is it necessary to install it on your hard drive and reformat your hard drive?

Edit: topic and content modified because I had my original questions answered and I now have new ones.

Warrior

Quote from: effect on March 09, 2006, 11:52 PM
Islam is a steaming pile of fucking dog shit. Everything about it is flawed, anybody who believes in it is a terrorist, if you disagree with me, then im sorry your wrong.

Quote from: Rule on May 07, 2006, 01:30 PM
Why don't you stop being American and start acting like a decent human?

Joe[x86]

1. Never used Anaconda or RedHat, but in both Ubuntu and Slackware there has been the option. In Slackware, you have to run fdisk before you run setup, but in Ubuntu the installer just comes up and partitioning is a step.

2. You mean using a LiveCD as your main OS? That's a pretty weird idea, but it shouldn't cause any BIOS problems. It'd get annoying as hell having to reconfigure your entire system each time you reboot, but it would work in theory. If you mean you ran it once, I can't see any reason a problem could come along.

3. Knoppix is a LiveCD distribution. You stick the disk in and start from it, boom, you're in Linux. It's like booting from a system disk (floppy) on a much bigger scale (somewhere around 400:1 =p).

4. FC4 is an installed distro, so nope.
Quote from: brew on April 25, 2007, 07:33 PM
that made me feel like a total idiot. this entire thing was useless.

MyndFyre

I'm pretty sure Slackware can be instaled on a FAT disk, can't it?
QuoteEvery generation of humans believed it had all the answers it needed, except for a few mysteries they assumed would be solved at any moment. And they all believed their ancestors were simplistic and deluded. What are the odds that you are the first generation of humans who will understand reality?

After 3 years, it's on the horizon.  The new JinxBot, and BN#, the managed Battle.net Client library.

Quote from: chyea on January 16, 2009, 05:05 PM
You've just located global warming.

Joe[x86]

I don't see why you'd want to, but I guess so.
Quote from: brew on April 25, 2007, 07:33 PM
that made me feel like a total idiot. this entire thing was useless.

MyndFyre

Quote from: J on April 15, 2006, 05:58 PM
I don't see why you'd want to, but I guess so.

For the precise reason that they made it an option: in case you want to dual-boot Windows and Linux on the same machine without repartitioning.
QuoteEvery generation of humans believed it had all the answers it needed, except for a few mysteries they assumed would be solved at any moment. And they all believed their ancestors were simplistic and deluded. What are the odds that you are the first generation of humans who will understand reality?

After 3 years, it's on the horizon.  The new JinxBot, and BN#, the managed Battle.net Client library.

Quote from: chyea on January 16, 2009, 05:05 PM
You've just located global warming.