• Welcome to Valhalla Legends Archive.
 

vl bot uptime - im curious

Started by warz, April 08, 2006, 02:16 AM

Previous topic - Next topic
Print
|
Go Down Pages1
User actions

warz

April 08, 2006, 02:16 AM
Only because battle.net has been a small portion of my life (as a hobby, i guess), and vl was an even smaller portion of the battle.net portion, and portions are oh so very interesting... I was just wondering what the [vL] account's total logged online time is. I'm guessing it's probably the number one account on bnet for online time. I'm sure I'm not the only one interested. Just thought I'd ask and see if any of yall'd be nice enough to share this bit of information with me.

Kp

#1
April 08, 2006, 10:28 AM
Quote from: warz on April 08, 2006, 02:16 AMI'm guessing it's probably the number one account on bnet for online time.

As measured by battle.net, probably not.  By logging on multiple instances of the same account, you can accrue online time at an accelerated rate.  Many clans with multiple-operator channels probably beat out [vL] on that basis.
[19:20:23] (BotNet) <[vL]Kp> Any idiot can make a bot with CSB, and many do!

Yegg

#2
April 08, 2006, 11:19 AM
I have a question out of curiosity. Is it really that hard to have a higher online time than any other user (not including accounts logged on more than once)? If you have a static IP and a UPS with a pretty high uptime, can't you easily have for instance, 200 days online as long as Battle.net doesn't have an unlikely server issue?

topaz

#3
April 08, 2006, 01:29 PM
Quote from: Yegg on April 08, 2006, 11:19 AM
I have a question out of curiosity. Is it really that hard to have a higher online time than any other user (not including accounts logged on more than once)? If you have a static IP and a UPS with a pretty high uptime, can't you easily have for instance, 200 days online as long as Battle.net doesn't have an unlikely server issue?

Servers restart at an unknown regularity, and patches for most clients occur something like every XXX days. You probably won't be able to get a very high uptime.
RLY...?

warz

#4
April 08, 2006, 04:36 PM
Quote from: Kp on April 08, 2006, 10:28 AM
Quote from: warz on April 08, 2006, 02:16 AMI'm guessing it's probably the number one account on bnet for online time.

As measured by battle.net, probably not.  By logging on multiple instances of the same account, you can accrue online time at an accelerated rate.  Many clans with multiple-operator channels probably beat out [vL] on that basis.

Oh, shoot.

quasi-modo

#5
April 09, 2006, 08:12 PM
It's hard to get a 200 day uptime anyway, ups or not. I've just never had an isp (or system) quite that stable. My records has prolly been two or three weeks w/ out a loss of connectivity.
WAR EAGLE!
Quote(00:04:08) zdv17: yeah i quit doing that stuff cause it jacked up the power bill too much
(00:04:19) nick is a turtle: Right now im not paying the power bill though
(00:04:33) nick is a turtle: if i had to pay the electric bill
(00:04:47) nick is a turtle: id hibernate when i go to class
(00:04:57) nick is a turtle: or at least when i go to sleep
(00:08:50) zdv17: hibernating in class is cool.. esp. when you leave a drool puddle

rabbit

#6
April 10, 2006, 05:31 PM
He doesn't mean uptime, he said "total logged time".
Grif: Yeah, and the people in the red states are mad because the people in the blue states are mean to them and want them to pay money for roads and schools instead of cool things like NASCAR and shotguns.  Also, there's something about ketchup in there.
Print
|
Go Up Pages1
User actions