BNLS : AH WTF HELP ME

[NetNX]

err.. sorry about having to ask but i cant get bnls to work can someone give me the code to connect because i have 2 versions the old on connects to battle.net and tells me the version of sc is wrong its sending  1.09 and the newer bnls gives me nothing at all it dose nothing i can click connect all i want and nothing happens. help me plz.

[Smurfling]

http://cuphead.valhallalegends.com/ocx.htm

look in CupHeads Spec's.
I think you just use the new csb with the old accept=-65.
Inside the document is all you need

[Kp]

err.. sorry about having to ask but i cant get bnls to work can someone give me the code to connect because i have 2 versions the old on connects to battle.net and tells me the version of sc is wrong its sending  1.09 and the newer bnls gives me nothing at all it dose nothing i can click connect all i want and nothing happens. help me plz.

Repost your question with added grammar and more attention to punctuation.   State specifically what your program is doing and what response it receives.  It may help to include dumps of data sent to/from BNLS (omit account password and cdkey, of course).

[Smurfling]

err.. sorry about having to ask but i cant get bnls to work can someone give me the code to connect because i have 2 versions the old on connects to battle.net and tells me the version of sc is wrong its sending  1.09 and the newer bnls gives me nothing at all it dose nothing i can click connect all i want and nothing happens. help me plz.

Repost your question with added grammar and more attention to punctuation.   State specifically what your program is doing and what response it receives.  It may help to include dumps of data sent to/from BNLS (omit account password and cdkey, of course).

KP: He doesn't receive any response from Battle.Net. Because of his csb.connect value is wrong csb doesn't even connect. All he need's to do is look at CupHead's doc, get the right value, insert it into his code instead of -65 and there he goes  
Well but he truly should pay more attention to grammar and punctuation  

[UserLoser]

Unless I'm blind, no where in his message says that he uses Cuphead's CleanSlateBot

[Smurfling]

Unless I'm blind, no where in his message says that he uses Cuphead's CleanSlateBot

First of all i am really wondering how he can have 2 versions of bnls. The second is that what he describes was already posted here as a problem with the csb accept value which was changed in the current csb. Third would be that you're right, but then he should post his connect code so people can look at it in order to help him, not just say "i cant get this to work, give me your code..."

[UserLoser]

Theres two versions of BNLS?

[Kp]

Theres two versions of BNLS?

Well, I've seen some people do incredibly stupid things like instantiate a CleanSlateBot with the object name "BNLS".  Thus, they get to do things like BNLS.Accept = (magicvalue).  Quite a mess, IMO.

[NetNX]

yes im using cupheads bnls theres an older version of bnls so there are 2 versions instant message me if u want me to send u the old one. i dont know why anyone would want it

[Kp]

yes im using cupheads bnls theres an older version of bnls so there are 2 versions instant message me if u want me to send u the old one. i dont know why anyone would want it

CupHead never took part in the writing of BNLS, nor did he release any copies of it.  What you have is mislabeled, possibly with malicious intent.

[drivehappy]

He must be thinking of a compiled bot with the name BNLS in it. Or, he's refering to CSB.

[NetNX]

ah fuck it it dosnet matter i have been reading the source code to eth bot and im learning alot so i dont need to use bnls no more

[Eternal]

"If something's too hard, then it isn't worth doing..."
Homer, 1998 (ish)


That motto mean anything to you?

[Slugger69]

stop being so damn picky and try to help him.

[Kp]

stop being so damn picky and try to help him.

Help him with what?  I've yet to see a message in this thread that clearly states what is wrong, how he knows it is wrong, and what he's doing immediately prior to the problem.  The regulars here are good, but we aren't clairvoyant.  Problems are much more easily solved once we know what we're solving.