Valhalla Legends Archive

Quote from: hismajesty on December 14, 2003, 10:17 AM
Bush still does lead the next election as far as popular votes based on a recent poll iirc. I personally like Bush, but I get yelled at for defending him at school...

Yelled at?  You can summarily dismiss your opposition then as communists.  Or Brits.

Quote from: hismajesty on December 14, 2003, 10:17 AM
Bush still does lead the next election as far as popular votes based on a recent poll iirc. I personally like Bush, but I get yelled at for defending him at school...

Well, he looks american I suppose. But he still seems like a miserable failure

+1 for america

Quote from: Mitosis on December 14, 2003, 09:20 AM
This will be a good breakthrough for Bush considering that the American people want him out, because he rushed into a world war. But then again some people will still want him out.

World War III started!?.........OMG, when!?...has it gone nuclear yet!?
AH!


Bush proposed bills to the UN & then decided not to support the US in the war against Iraq, therefore I see it fit that only countries that helped with the war gain from the business oppurtunities.  If the US just never helped anyone the USSR would probably still exsist, Hitler may even be in power in Europe, God only knows if it weren't for the US getting involved in foreign affairs.

Lets not forget though in WWII america only joined in cos they attacked and they act like they won the war single handedly. Im a Brit

Quote from: CrAz3D on December 14, 2003, 02:12 PM
Hitler may even be in power in Europe...

And everywhere else in the world...

Rabbit, Britian was basically the only country left agaisnt Hitler, eventually Britian would've fallen withough help.

& jok3r, quite true

Quote from: Mitosis on December 14, 2003, 09:51 AM
Plus, Bush is following in his fathers foot steps. They were always starting wars and after the oil. When they invading Iraq one of the first things they did and tried to do was take over the oil. That tells you something right there.

maybe because the oil was on fire.  not good to breath.

Quote from: The-Rabid-Lord on December 14, 2003, 02:15 PM
Lets not forget though in WWII america only joined in cos they attacked and they act like they won the war single handedly. Im a Brit

Beat Japan almost by ourselves, yes.  But impossible to have beaten back Rommel without staging with the Brits on their soil.

Yes america were powerful and helped us but we did fight most of the war. We might not have fallen. Hitler liked britain as a country side scenery thing so went and invaded russia instead.

Quote from: CrAz3D on December 14, 2003, 03:02 PM
Rabbit, Britian was basically the only country left agaisnt Hitler, eventually Britian would've fallen withough help.

& jok3r, quite true

No, the USSR was also pushing back the Nazis.
Britain would not have fallen, at least for many years. They beat back the Luftwaffe in the Battle of Britain, and with that, Germany lost any means of defending a landing force sent to Britain.

Heh, propanganda is great.  It's amazing how many people buy into a lot of falsehoods.  

btw, this wasn't a world war.  This was a huge rich country with tons of weapons attacking a tiny poor country with extremely limited weapons.

Quote from: iago on December 14, 2003, 04:09 PM
Heh, propanganda is great.  It's amazing how many people buy into a lot of falsehoods.  

btw, this wasn't a world war.  This was a huge rich country with tons of weapons attacking a tiny poor country with extremely limited weapons.

afganishstan(sp?) is even worse.

Strategy wise, I saw Osama has kicked Bush's ass, he doesn't have nearly the resources as Bush, but has he been caught? Who has caused more damage to who's country? Which country respect which 'leader' more?

As for Saddam, I feel it's about time, and although he doesn't have as much as Bush, he managed to evaded him alot. Bush still won though  

Quote from: CrAz3D on December 14, 2003, 02:12 PM
Bush proposed bills to the UN & then decided not to support the US in the war against Iraq, therefore I see it fit that only countries that helped with the war gain from the business oppurtunities.  If the US just never helped anyone the USSR would probably still exsist, Hitler may even be in power in Europe, God only knows if it weren't for the US getting involved in foreign affairs.

You mean, since we're not robbers, and didn't go robbing that poor guy, we shouldn't get to split the loot? I suppose that makes sense. We'd all rather see that you pay out of your own pocket for his broken glasses and clothes though.