Self-Check: Are you worthy?

[Ringo]

afaik, vL has been long dead on battle.net, even the acc [vL] has been dead on bnet for a long time as well.
Its got the best bnet bot dev forum I have ever come across tho.

[Spht]

Would be nice if [vL] on battle.net came back.  nice to have a place where there are actually interesting people that don't spam what song they're listening to every 3 minutes, useless anti-idles that go off every minute, or people repetitively/obsessively querying redundant commands on their bot all day long (.time, .uptime, .whoami, "hai you want access to my bot lolz").  i am describing diablo usa-1

[MyndFyre]

Would be nice if [vL] on battle.net came back.  nice to have a place where there are actually interesting people that don't spam what song they're listening to every 3 minutes, useless anti-idles that go off every minute, or people repetitively/obsessively querying redundant commands on their bot all day long (like .time, .uptime, .whoami, "hai you want access to my bot lolz").  i am describing diablo usa-1

I hope it will a bit before Starcraft 2 comes out.

[iago]

Would be nice if [vL] on battle.net came back.  nice to have a place where there are actually interesting people that don't spam what song they're listening to every 3 minutes, useless anti-idles that go off every minute, or people repetitively/obsessively querying redundant commands on their bot all day long (.time, .uptime, .whoami, "hai you want access to my bot lolz").  i am describing diablo usa-1

SILC.

[Barabajagal]

If you don't like it, why are you still there?

[Joe[x86]]

This forum is Diablo USA-1?

[Spht]

SILC.

I couldn't find a decent non-bloated client for it and have no interest writing my own

The good thing about [vL] was the channel is non-passworded so anyone on battle.net can get in, so interesting people and strangers often stopped by a lot, and anyone non-interesting could just be banned.  silc isn't really what i'm interested in as it's designed more for secure conferencing between pre-determined people

[warz]

except, there's more than a password stopping people from getting on battle.net. you have to have a cdkey, correct game versions, etc, if you're wanting to use a bot. if you're not using a bot, then chatting for long periods of time is pretty painful.

so, if about ease-of-access is your motivation, then silc or irc is generally much, much better.

[iago]

SILC.

I couldn't find a decent non-bloated client for it and have no interest writing my own

The good thing about [vL] was the channel is non-passworded so anyone on battle.net can get in, so interesting people and strangers often stopped by a lot, and anyone non-interesting could just be banned.  silc isn't really what i'm interested in as it's designed more for secure conferencing between pre-determined people

I like the irssi-based client, although I also like irssi, so maybe that's why.

It's possible (I think?) to have a non-passworded channel on SILC.

[Hostile]

The good thing about [vL] was the channel is non-passworded so anyone on battle.net can get in, so interesting people and strangers often stopped by a lot, and anyone non-interesting could just be banned.  silc isn't really what i'm interested in as it's designed more for secure conferencing between pre-determined people

Probably won't happen until SC2 comes out dude... So far this year I haven't even been going on TFT to play Dota. Maybe if I don't go camping this weekend~