State Senator verbally attacks Adult Parole Board Nominee

[hismajesty]

Yes, look, that's from August of 2004. This is January of 2006.

Back then I thought you'd make informational topics, not just anti-Bush flamebait.

Looks to me like you're 'waffling'. Besides, doesn't look like you were talking about what would happen, you said you are always interested in his political posts, not that you will be interested in them. Face it, you've put your foot in your mouth, and it's pretty funny.

It looks to me like you're attempting to argue a moot point. Furthermore, you're right...I wasn't talking about what "would" happen, I was always interested in Grok's posts back in August, 2004 not in January of 2006.

In January of 2006 I generally find Grok's topics to be of annoyance and serve no purpose as they're generally repeats of the exact same things that have been brought up before (ie. Bush sucks).

In August of 2004 I had a lot of respect for Grok due to his time served in the armed forces, but now that respect has been overshadowed by his constant (and often uncalled for) blatant criticism of our Commander in Chief. I don't know if Grok held any high rank in the services, but I know my grandfather did...and I know he wouldn't appreciate it too much if people consistently and unjustly criticised him, just for the sake of doing so.

[Mephisto]

It looks to me like you're attempting to argue a moot point. Furthermore, you're right...I wasn't talking about what "would" happen, I was always interested in Grok's posts back in August, 2004 not in January of 2006.

In January of 2006 I generally find Grok's topics to be of annoyance and serve no purpose as they're generally repeats of the exact same things that have been brought up before (ie. Bush sucks).

In August of 2004 I had a lot of respect for Grok due to his time served in the armed forces, but now that respect has been overshadowed by his constant (and often uncalled for) blatant criticism of our Commander in Chief. I don't know if Grok held any high rank in the services, but I know my grandfather did...and I know he wouldn't appreciate it too much if people consistently and unjustly criticised him, just for the sake of doing so.

Who's "him" -- Bush or your Grandfather?

Furthermore, Bush's criticism is brought about his own actions which are his fault, obviously.  There are a large number of people that are criticising Bush, even members of his own party!  It also seems like you are saying people in the armed forces should have to respect their "commander in chief" and what he says should be upheld and supported; not true, IMO.

[hismajesty]

Who's "him" -- Bush or your Grandfather?

Both now that I think about it. However, I originally intended for it to be about my grandfather as I don't know Bush or how he reacts. I think he probably just ignores it...

[CrAz3D]

It looks to me like you're attempting to argue a moot point. Furthermore, you're right...I wasn't talking about what "would" happen, I was always interested in Grok's posts back in August, 2004 not in January of 2006.

In January of 2006 I generally find Grok's topics to be of annoyance and serve no purpose as they're generally repeats of the exact same things that have been brought up before (ie. Bush sucks).

In August of 2004 I had a lot of respect for Grok due to his time served in the armed forces, but now that respect has been overshadowed by his constant (and often uncalled for) blatant criticism of our Commander in Chief. I don't know if Grok held any high rank in the services, but I know my grandfather did...and I know he wouldn't appreciate it too much if people consistently and unjustly criticised him, just for the sake of doing so.

Who's "him" -- Bush or your Grandfather?

Furthermore, Bush's criticism is brought about his own actions which are his fault, obviously.  There are a large number of people that are criticising Bush, even members of his own party!  It also seems like you are saying people in the armed forces should have to respect their "commander in chief" and what he says should be upheld and supported; not true, IMO.

I believe if you read it carefully one would be right it believing trust refered to his grandfather as 'him'.

ANYWAY, it looks like Garcia might have also just been upset at Hernandez because he was apart of the investigation against her brother-in-law & nephew for a racketeering case involving a local Welcome Inn.
Maybe she just got a little personal about it all