lmao

[quasi-modo]

Let's do this practically (I am one to entertain guesses, but eventually like to see reinforcement).

Find me some measurements taken on dyno at the transmission and to the wheels, comparing AWD and RWD.  That's all I ask.  Your assertion may be right.  It may be wrong.  Right now it's just a guess.

Okay, let me just find dyno results for a lancer with awd and one with rwd.... My previous post was a bit more then a guess.

By the way, a sample size of 1 is not statistically significant, but I am sure you will concede that and we can have fun talking about efficiencies instead of confidence.

Oh gosh... please do not get me going on statistics. I am taking a class in that right now... horribly boreing stuff.

Well we would have to chop outliers too, things like ferrari and lamborgini.

[UserLoser.]

Hey I thought we're supposed to stay on topic here

[CrAz3D]

Hey I thought we're supposed to stay on topic here

It almost, sorta, kinda, relatively is.  We're talking about cars & traction & acceleration of them for AWD vs. RWD.  Original post (which I thought was another thread) is about cars that have little traction & are sliding about on the ice

[quasi-modo]

Hey I thought we're supposed to stay on topic here

It almost, sorta, kinda, relatively is.  We're talking about cars & traction & acceleration of them for AWD vs. RWD.  Original post (which I thought was another thread) is about cars that have little traction & are sliding about on the ice

I am thinking he means statistics is not  fun™?

[CrAz3D]

"Beauty is in the eye of the beer holder"

[Adron]

Hey I thought we're supposed to stay on topic here

It almost, sorta, kinda, relatively is.  We're talking about cars & traction & acceleration of them for AWD vs. RWD.  Original post (which I thought was another thread) is about cars that have little traction & are sliding about on the ice

I am thinking he means statistics is not  fun™?

It's ok as long as the first post in the thread is Fun™.