• Welcome to Valhalla Legends Archive.
 
Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Messages - Explicit

#1
Gaming Discussion / Re: Diablo III 2011
July 24, 2011, 01:58 PM
Get me in!
#2
You kids...
#3
It's not unusual to handle the byte ordering as the packets go both out onto the wire and back. The idea is to forego any endianness issues that may arise since your code will then be designed to handle the ordering natively on any system running it.
#4
Thing-O-Rama ™ / Re: Tell us now!
May 29, 2009, 01:40 PM
Quote from: Hero on May 29, 2009, 06:09 AM
Quote from: Explicit on May 17, 2009, 09:24 AM
Quote from: Ishbar on May 16, 2009, 02:35 PM
Fuck you.

Everlasting_Misconception? That's very homo. I suppose that can be expected when you're a youngster having an identity crisis.
settle down sir

:)
#5
Thing-O-Rama ™ / Re: Tell us now!
May 17, 2009, 09:24 AM
Quote from: Ishbar on May 16, 2009, 02:35 PM
Fuck you.

Everlasting_Misconception? That's very homo. I suppose that can be expected when you're a youngster having an identity crisis.
#6
Way to bump an old topic, guys....
#7
Quote from: Yegg on May 13, 2009, 02:09 AM
Quote from: Explicit on May 13, 2009, 01:58 AM
He's not asking anyone to port it for him; way to sidestep the point. Regardless, I digress.

"checkrevision in python" ... hmm. This couldn't mean he would like to have checkrevision in Python, could it?
He didn't say he wanted to just have access to the checkrevision while using Python, he wants checkrevision IN Python. Clearly meaning that he wants it coded in Python. Way to not pay attention.

Stop trying to downplay it with the semantics argument in order to save face. It was obvious what he was asking for, and my point addressed just that: the OP was seeing if anyone had already ported checkrevision to Python so that he could use it with his current code.

To spell it out for you:

Quote from: Yegg on May 12, 2009, 11:39 PM
Quote from: Explicit on May 12, 2009, 10:38 PM
Quote from: Yegg on May 12, 2009, 07:23 PM
Quote from: aton on May 12, 2009, 12:38 PM
i was wondering if someone could save me the work, anything wrong about it?

I'm not so sure what you're trying to say.

Don't be dense. He wants to save himself the extra bit of work in the event that someone else had already ported the solution over.

I was trying to convince myself that he wouldn't ask for someone to do just that, so he could copy and paste a few functions into his program without ever knowing how it works.

You are switching up your argumentative stance at this point, as evidenced by the initial post I quoted.

In response to your ad hominem of "way to not pay attention," either learn how to argue with content not based on semantics or stfu. Better yet, gtfo.

Quote from: l)ragon on May 13, 2009, 07:17 AM
Quote from: Yegg on May 13, 2009, 02:09 AM
Quote from: Explicit on May 13, 2009, 01:58 AM
He's not asking anyone to port it for him; way to sidestep the point. Regardless, I digress.

"checkrevision in python" ... hmm. This couldn't mean he would like to have checkrevision in Python, could it?
He didn't say he wanted to just have access to the checkrevision while using Python, he wants checkrevision IN Python. Clearly meaning that he wants it coded in Python. Way to not pay attention.
He was asking if anyone has done it in Python, so that he could reuse it is what I gather from the thread.

Thanks for the second opinion, l)ragon. :)

Off-topic, not that all of this isn't already off-topic: You haven't been on IRC in awhile. Get on it!
#8
He's not asking anyone to port it for him; way to sidestep the point. Regardless, I digress.
#9
There is nothing wrong with trying to save yourself from doing work that's already been done; that's the premise for the entire open source movement. Besides, if he already has a working client, then it wouldn't make a difference if he's taking the copy-and-paste approach since he's going to have to implement it into his current code anyway.
#10
Quote from: Yegg on May 12, 2009, 07:23 PM
Quote from: aton on May 12, 2009, 12:38 PM
i was wondering if someone could save me the work, anything wrong about it?

I'm not so sure what you're trying to say.

Don't be dense. He wants to save himself the extra bit of work in the event that someone else had already ported the solution over.
#11
I think it was called Rollies'. Not sure though.
#12
Quote from: Denial on April 18, 2009, 09:15 PM
ya im around lakewood still and tacoma sometimes seattle. where you around nowadays?

I was pretty smashed at a bar near the CDS driving school over there off exit 127 the other day. As for me, I'm still near the airport.
#13
Quote from: Denial on April 18, 2009, 01:22 AM
yegg who are you anyway i dont reconize your name.


and riffriot my guess is you havent been around on these forms to often or you just came back cause i've been around for quite some time played some fun things with vl and battle.net over the years.

Cheers! Are you still in Lakewood (I think it was Lakewood)?
#14
Quote from: Andy on January 31, 2009, 02:39 AM
And here I was thinking the world sucks because the people who do use their brains take all the resources they can from those who don't, or are under some misguided pretense that they can improve the human race by removing it from nature. Thinking does much worse than not thinking ever will.

You may not realize it, but you inadvertently put yourself into a false dilemma if you really believe that.
#15
Quote from: PunK on January 19, 2009, 05:55 PM
Quote from: Explicit on January 17, 2009, 08:51 PM
Quote from: Spht on January 17, 2009, 08:21 PM
Quote from: Andy on January 17, 2009, 06:10 PM
Relax? I'm just asking a question. ???

Calm down, man.  i don't want anyone to get hurt here

It's ok, I have the paramedics on speed dial.

What's the number again?

That's not important!