(http://www.clan-e1.net/trust/images/peterson.png)
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,138362,00.html
I take it this is your first attempt at owned superimposing?
I have to say I stopped caring about this case when it became a big popular thing. As soon as a trial is that big, it becomes totall stupid.
Quote from: Spht on November 12, 2004, 07:12 PM
I take it this is your first attempt at owned superimposing?
There's a proper way to do it?
QuoteI have to say I stopped caring about this case when it became a big popular thing. As soon as a trial is that big, it becomes totall stupid.
I didn't really follow it either. Does anybody remember why this case was so big? People kill their wives all the time.
I was wondering the same thing. It's not like he's famous or anything (like OJ)..
The evidence was pretty overwhelmingly against him, maybe that's why!
Who the hell is that guy? I've never heard of this trial until I read this post.
It's been the biggest trial in the US this year, and the country has followed it all year.
Ahh, I remember my mom and dad talking about this case. I think it's all bullshit and that the guy should have been put away, right away.
Perhaps because he's the first man charged of murdering an unborn child? Unless this has been charged against other people already. Especially though, when there's all this controversy about abortions.
Yea, I was thinking about that. Apparently a child isn't just a clump of cells anymore.
Quote from: hismajesty[yL] on November 14, 2004, 01:19 AM
Quote from: iago on November 13, 2004, 11:28 PM
Quote from: hismajesty[yL] on November 13, 2004, 05:07 PM
the country has followed it all year.
The tabloids*
No, the mainstream media.
Well, maybe there, then. I didn't see it in any of our "mainstream" media here, just in Tabloids.
Quote from: hismajesty[yL] on November 13, 2004, 05:07 PM
It's been the biggest trial in the US this year, and the country has followed it all year.
I hadn't even heard of it until now.
Personally, I don't think that there was enough evidence to convict. It was an entirely circumstantial case and they didn't have one scrap of hard evidence that he did anything.