Valhalla Legends Archive

Programming => Battle.net Bot Development => Topic started by: Tontow on July 18, 2005, 05:38 PM

Title: Alternative packet loggers
Post by: Tontow on July 18, 2005, 05:38 PM
Ethereal isn't working with my 56k dialup for some reason.... 
Please, dose anyone know of anything that is free and as good as Ethereal?
Title: Re: Alternative packet loggers
Post by: R.a.B.B.i.T on July 18, 2005, 05:49 PM
WPE Pro Alpha 9
Title: Re: Alternative packet loggers
Post by: iago on July 18, 2005, 06:14 PM
I'll beat Kp to the punch, because I know he'll want to suggest it:

Tcpdump (http://www.tcpdump.org)
Title: Re: Alternative packet loggers
Post by: Hdx on July 18, 2005, 06:18 PM
WPE Pro Alpha 0.9a. (http://hdx.no-ip.org/files/WPE.zip)
Link to go with FoFo's suggestion.
~-~(HDX)~-~
Title: Re: Alternative packet loggers
Post by: Kp on July 18, 2005, 09:05 PM
Quote from: iago on July 18, 2005, 06:14 PMI'll beat Kp to the punch, because I know he'll want to suggest it:

Tcpdump (http://www.tcpdump.org)

Thanks, but I was going to suggest that he get a less sucky Internet connection. :)  Afaik, Ethereal works fine on systems that use an actual network card to be online (i.e. cable, maybe DSL).  It's only when some poor luser tries to mix antiquated technology like a modem with Ethereal that problems result. ;)
Title: Re: Alternative packet loggers
Post by: iago on July 18, 2005, 09:12 PM
Quote from: Kp on July 18, 2005, 09:05 PM
Quote from: iago on July 18, 2005, 06:14 PMI'll beat Kp to the punch, because I know he'll want to suggest it:

Tcpdump (http://www.tcpdump.org)

Thanks, but I was going to suggest that he get a less sucky Internet connection. :)  Afaik, Ethereal works fine on systems that use an actual network card to be online (i.e. cable, maybe DSL).  It's only when some poor luser tries to mix antiquated technology like a modem with Ethereal that problems result. ;)

Yes, it works fine with DSL.  At least, on mine; I don't know if all DSL is the same, but mine goes through an ethernet card to the modem to the phoneline, and all works as PPPoE.  the communication up to the modem uses standard ethernet, and then it gets complicated.
Title: Re: Alternative packet loggers
Post by: Tontow on July 19, 2005, 11:25 AM
Thanks everyone for the suggestions.

Quote from: Kp on July 18, 2005, 09:05 PM

Thanks, but I was going to suggest that he get a less sucky Internet connection. :)  Afaik, Ethereal works fine on systems that use an actual network card to be online (i.e. cable, maybe DSL).  It's only when some poor luser tries to mix antiquated technology like a modem with Ethereal that problems result. ;)

I really wish I could get a faster internet connection, but I live out in the middle of nowhere and all I can get is dialup and satellite which is $100 the first month and $50 for each month after that. -- I just don't have that kind of money right now.
Title: Re: Alternative packet loggers
Post by: Archangel on July 19, 2005, 01:35 PM
i pay $100/month for a 1 mbps connection. I live in the country where the technology isnt that great :(.
Title: Re: Alternative packet loggers
Post by: R.a.B.B.i.T on July 19, 2005, 04:31 PM
Verizon is $20/month for 3mbps in South Jersey :\
Title: Re: Alternative packet loggers
Post by: Warrior on July 19, 2005, 07:22 PM
I feel your paid Rab :( I got that crap. Too bad they never billed me  ;)
Title: Re: Alternative packet loggers
Post by: R.a.B.B.i.T on July 19, 2005, 08:46 PM
I love Verizon.  Their service is better than AOL's $27/month 512kbps DSL.
Title: Re: Alternative packet loggers
Post by: Tontow on July 19, 2005, 08:59 PM
Umm, could someone compile Tcpdump for me please?  All I have is the Visual Basic 6 component of Microsoft visual studio 6.0.

And WPE PRO isn't working for me either; I keep getting "DLL injection failed".

Title: Re: Alternative packet loggers
Post by: Kp on July 19, 2005, 09:25 PM
Quote from: Tontow on July 19, 2005, 08:59 PMUmm, could someone compile Tcpdump for me please?

You're in luck!  I already have it compiled for my own uses, and I can send you a copy.  However, you'll need to have glibc 2.3.2 or newer in your ldpath or you might have trouble getting it to find the necessary shared objects.  If you run into problems, check /etc/ld.so.conf or set LD_LIBRARY_PATH (dangerous - not for the faint of heart).
Title: Re: Alternative packet loggers
Post by: Tontow on July 19, 2005, 09:49 PM
Aim: tontow20
email: [email protected]

I don't have glibc 2.3.2. Dose it need to be compiled too?
Title: Re: Alternative packet loggers
Post by: MyndFyre on July 19, 2005, 10:25 PM
Quote from: Tontow on July 19, 2005, 09:49 PM
Aim: tontow20
email: [email protected]

I don't have glibc 2.3.2. Dose it need to be compiled too?
And I'm pretty sure you need Linux as well.
Title: Re: Alternative packet loggers
Post by: iago on July 19, 2005, 10:30 PM
Verizon sucks because their space is a HUGE perveyer of spam, and they don't do crap about it.  They also have ridiculous anti-spam members for inbound emails, including authenticating or something stupid.  They're bloody hypocrites!

Quote from: Kp on July 19, 2005, 09:25 PM
Quote from: Tontow on July 19, 2005, 08:59 PMUmm, could someone compile Tcpdump for me please?

You're in luck!  I already have it compiled for my own uses, and I can send you a copy.  However, you'll need to have glibc 2.3.2 or newer in your ldpath or you might have trouble getting it to find the necessary shared objects.  If you run into problems, check /etc/ld.so.conf or set LD_LIBRARY_PATH (dangerous - not for the faint of heart).

See, this is why I love you. :-P
Title: Re: Alternative packet loggers
Post by: R.a.B.B.i.T on July 20, 2005, 12:47 AM
That's why I have gmail accounts, not verizon accounts.
Title: Re: Alternative packet loggers
Post by: Tontow on July 21, 2005, 08:44 PM
I managed to find a compiled vershion of Tcpdump on download.com.  It didn't work  :-\ .  Nothing I found on download.com worked...  :-\ :-\ :'(

Shure, thay found my network card ok, but none of them found my 56k dileup modem.  :'( PLEASE PLEASE HELP!!!!!!
Title: Re: Alternative packet loggers
Post by: Sorc.Polgara on July 23, 2005, 09:39 PM
Cox Cable here >_<

Like $29.99 a month.  I don't have to pay, my dad does!
Title: Re: Alternative packet loggers
Post by: Forged on July 24, 2005, 12:17 AM
Quote from: MyndFyre on July 19, 2005, 10:25 PM
Quote from: Tontow on July 19, 2005, 09:49 PM
Aim: tontow20
email: [email protected]

I don't have glibc 2.3.2. Dose it need to be compiled too?
And I'm pretty sure you need Linux as well.

I think GCC is ported.
Title: Re: Alternative packet loggers
Post by: Tontow on July 24, 2005, 12:38 PM
Dose anyone know of a packet logger that supports Dialup adapters?
Title: Re: Alternative packet loggers
Post by: dxoigmn on July 24, 2005, 01:32 PM
Quote from: Tontow on July 24, 2005, 12:38 PM
Dose anyone know of a packet logger that supports Dialup adapters?

CommView
Title: Re: Alternative packet loggers
Post by: Topaz on July 24, 2005, 01:42 PM
AnalogX pmon.
Title: Re: Alternative packet loggers
Post by: Tontow on July 25, 2005, 01:22 AM
CommView works for every other packet (evaluation); I don't want to buy it because I'm probably only going to use it once.  And AnalogX pmon doesn't support Win 98.