BNSimulator: bot development tool

[Tuberload]

Thanks

[Grok]

Which version of battle.net does it emulate?

Does it support account numbers?

[Adron]

As far as I know, account numbers don't apply to the chat protocol, or to the current binary protocol?

[Freeware]

sounds intresting, maybe the next BNETed?

[iago]

eww@editing out the original post.. I would have liked to read it!

[Grok]

I don't like that BBS feature.  Non-moderators should not be able to edit posts which have replies.

[Tuberload]

I was asking for any suggestions or idea's for a server/development tool that mimic's the chat protocol. This is a learning situation for me, and I figured I would get some feed back I myself might have over looked. I felt like my post wasn't wanted so deleted it. If you like I will repost.

[iago]

I was asking for any suggestions or idea's for a server/development tool that mimic's the chat protocol. This is a learning situation for me, and I figured I would get some feed back I myself might have over looked. I felt like my post wasn't wanted so deleted it. If you like I will repost.

Based on their responses, it doesn't seem like it was unwanted..

[Grok]

As far as I know, account numbers don't apply to the chat protocol, or to the current binary protocol?

As far as I know, what you know so far is accurate.  IIRC, and I might not RC, well now I forgot what I was recalling, so far.  Still, when he mentioned he might later add game support, I extrapolated that the 'chat' term in 'chat server' was not specific to mean non-binary, but to mean BNCS emulation overall, but first supporting the chatting features.

That being the case, whether it was the case, is the case, or never was or is not currently the case, there would be choices of which BNCS to emulate.  In the stream of time there have been many iterations of BNCS varying by stability and features, account numbers among them.

[Soul Taker]

Ergo, concorduntly, vis-a-vis, hope is the quintessential human delusion... that's about all I got from your post Grok =P

[Tuberload]

As far as I know, account numbers don't apply to the chat protocol, or to the current binary protocol?

As far as I know, what you know so far is accurate.  IIRC, and I might not RC, well now I forgot what I was recalling, so far.  Still, when he mentioned he might later add game support, I extrapolated that the 'chat' term in 'chat server' was not specific to mean non-binary, but to mean BNCS emulation overall, but first supporting the chatting features.

That being the case, whether it was the case, is the case, or never was or is not currently the case, there would be choices of which BNCS to emulate.  In the stream of time there have been many iterations of BNCS varying by stability and features, account numbers among them.

I sort of understand what you are saying:

Grok is not doubting my knowledge of the chat protocol, but I was not specific in my projects description. Yada yada, whether Grok was right or wrong, the main point is there are two protocol types, telnet and game.

I thought you were sarcastically telling me I don't know what I am doing, so stfu.

Woops

[Adron]

Grok wasn't doubting *my* knowledge .. I don't think he said anything about your knowledge.

[Tuberload]

I left out a part of that sentence, my mistake.

[Grok]

Grok wasn't doubting *my* knowledge .. I don't think he said anything about your knowledge.

Undoubtedly, I don't doubt that.
Thus, it goes without saying that ..

[UserLoser]

Ergo, concorduntly, vis-a-vis, hope is the quintessential human delusion... that's about all I got from your post Grok =P

What the hell does that mean?