StarCraftJ.rar

[Barabajagal]

You don't want to see what I see.

[Michael]

[Barabajagal]

No. Not quite.

[Explicit]

I just don't get why you'd bother making any assertions at all, then, but okay, I'll leave it alone.

[Barabajagal]

Honestly, I don't either. I think it's something along the last lines of a call for help from my sanity, followed by instant repression. Would an admin mind deleting all of this crap? (Say pages 2, 3, and 4)

AND STOP DELETING THE LINK TO MY UPLOADS FOLDER, DAMMIT!

[Camel]

Honestly, technological development has a negative effect on humanity. As does medicine, laws, and anything else of that nature.

Anarchist!

[Barabajagal]

Not quite. I still have enough hope to believe people can peacefully coexist without government. Anarchy implies chaos, due to a lack of government and civil structure (not to be confused with social structure). What I believe in is an extreme form of socialism in which there is no leader, nor government system, yet everyone does what they need to do for the group to survive, without a loss of order. The only way I can see for humans to achieve this, however, is by rewriting the mind and removing a need to dominate.

[Camel]

an·ar·chy      /ˈænərki/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[an-er-kee] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation
–noun
1.   a state of society without government or law.
2.   political and social disorder due to the absence of governmental control: The death of the king was followed by a year of anarchy.
3.   a theory that regards the absence of all direct or coercive government as a political ideal and that proposes the cooperative and voluntary association of individuals and groups as the principal mode of organized society.
4.   confusion; chaos; disorder: Intellectual and moral anarchy followed his loss of faith.

Anarchy, the philosophy, does not imply chaos. It's a (lack of?) system that historically has always resulted in chaos.

[Barabajagal]

From that definition, it sure as hell seems it implies chaos.
1) society without law is chaos.
2) political and social disorder is chaos
3) [this one doesn't imply chaos, and follows near to my ideal system]
4) ...the second word IS chaos!

[Camel]

You might have noticed that I specified that I was referring to the philosophy, meaning #3.

[edit] So wait, you want a society with no government, but with law? Who enforces the law? The good will of man? I'd definitely call that chaos.

[Barabajagal]

The "good will of man" is fiction. Ideally, the mind would be rewritten to only think about helping.

[Camel]

So you're an idealist too, huh?

By idealist, I mean the belief that the nature of reality is fundamentally mental.

FWIW, I'm a libertarian (by ideology, not political association - I usually vote democrat), so I can understand where you come from. I also believe, however, that idealism is why things like the holocaust happened. I'm not trying to take a cheap shot, just throwing that out there.

[Barabajagal]

I realize, that, but it's also where almost all philosophical theories came from...
I come off as an idealist, but I don't have any strict doctored beliefs. My ideals are my own, which is probably part of the reason I come off as crazy.

[Michael]

So you're an idealist too, huh?

By idealist, I mean the belief that the nature of reality is fundamentally mental.

FWIW, I'm a libertarian (by ideology, not political association - I usually vote democrat), so I can understand where you come from. I also believe, however, that idealism is why things like the holocaust happened. I'm not trying to take a cheap shot, just throwing that out there.

Yes, it can bring things out like the holocaust, but whats more disturbing is out government knew about it since the start of it, yet we didn't inform the public or even bother to stop it. so as i see it some systems just suit certain personal needs better. As i always say "The us government is the best of the worst".

[Barabajagal]

So what does that make the Canadian government?