• Welcome to Valhalla Legends Archive.
 

Quick Question: CDKeys with letters in them

Started by Don Cullen, February 18, 2007, 09:38 PM

Previous topic - Next topic
Print
|
Go Down Pages 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
User actions

Spht

#30
February 20, 2007, 07:34 PM
Quote from: Mystical on February 20, 2007, 06:42 PM
Since Spht Deleted the post in the other thread

Sorry!  Meant to split the posts, not remove them

Don Cullen

#31
February 20, 2007, 07:52 PM Last Edit: February 20, 2007, 07:54 PM by Kyro
Quote from: Mystical on February 20, 2007, 06:42 PM
Since Spht Deleted the post in the other thread this current BNLS IP works for those of you that need to connect =)
84.9.75.83

I just tried that IP address. My BNLS_VERSIONCHECKEX2 got rejected (when it was normally working fine). By rejected I mean the server disconnected me after sending the packet.

[edit]
Isn't that Hdx's JBLS server, not BNLS? IIRC, Hdx's JBLS server doesn't work with lockdown as of now.
Regards,
Don
-------

Don't wonder why people suddenly are hostile when you treat them the way they shouldn't be- it's called 'Mutual Respect'.

Mystical

#32
February 20, 2007, 07:54 PM
Im assuming BNLS since im connected on STARCRAFT with it =P

Don Cullen

#33
February 20, 2007, 08:05 PM
That's strange. I'm having problems when I normally didn't. See anything wrong with this packet I'm sending to BNLS? It's the BNLS 0x1A packet...

0000   00 11 43 6e c2 07 00 15 e9 65 d2 4c 08 00 45 20  ..Cn.....e.L..E 
0010   00 28 82 81 40 00 70 06 27 c6 54 09 4b 53 c0 a8  .([email protected].'.T.KS..
0020   00 64 24 97 05 b3 58 cf ec 69 bc 2c 18 ac 50 10  .d$...X..i.,..P.
0030   44 29 c6 e6 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00              D)..........
Regards,
Don
-------

Don't wonder why people suddenly are hostile when you treat them the way they shouldn't be- it's called 'Mutual Respect'.

brew

#34
February 20, 2007, 08:24 PM
Kyro are you sure that's the right packet....? If it is then your send0x1a sub is severly screwed up.
<3 Zorm
Quote[01:08:05 AM] <@Zorm> haha, me get pussy? don't kid yourself quik
Scio te esse, sed quid sumne? :P

Ersan

#35
February 20, 2007, 08:52 PM
My, what blatant source leeching skills you have brew...

brew

#36
February 20, 2007, 09:07 PM
.........what the hell is that supposed to mean. I'm just saying that his packetlog is nothing close to what an 0x1a packet should look like.
<3 Zorm
Quote[01:08:05 AM] <@Zorm> haha, me get pussy? don't kid yourself quik
Scio te esse, sed quid sumne? :P

l2k-Shadow

#37
February 20, 2007, 09:14 PM
Quote from: Kyro on February 20, 2007, 08:05 PM
That's strange. I'm having problems when I normally didn't. See anything wrong with this packet I'm sending to BNLS? It's the BNLS 0x1A packet...

0000   00 11 43 6e c2 07 00 15 e9 65 d2 4c 08 00 45 20  ..Cn.....e.L..E 
0010   00 28 82 81 40 00 70 06 27 c6 54 09 4b 53 c0 a8  .([email protected].'.T.KS..
0020   00 64 24 97 05 b3 58 cf ec 69 bc 2c 18 ac 50 10  .d$...X..i.,..P.
0030   44 29 c6 e6 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00              D)..........


well if it was the 0x1A packet it would contain a 0x1A byte inside the packet....
Quote from: replaced on November 04, 2006, 11:54 AM
I dunno wat it means, someone tell me whats ix86 and pmac?
Can someone send me a working bot source (with bnls support) to my email?  Then help me copy and paste it to my bot? ;D
Já jsem byl určenej abych tady žil,
Dával si ovar, křen a k tomu pivo pil.
Tam by ses povídaj jak prase v žitě měl,
Já nechci před nikym sednout si na prdel.

Já nejsem z USA, já nejsem z USA, já vážně nejsem z USA... a snad se proto na mě nezloběj.

Ringo

#38
February 21, 2007, 03:40 AM
Quote from: Kyro on February 20, 2007, 07:52 PM
Quote from: Mystical on February 20, 2007, 06:42 PM
Since Spht Deleted the post in the other thread this current BNLS IP works for those of you that need to connect =)
84.9.75.83

I just tried that IP address. My BNLS_VERSIONCHECKEX2 got rejected (when it was normally working fine). By rejected I mean the server disconnected me after sending the packet.

[edit]
Isn't that Hdx's JBLS server, not BNLS? IIRC, Hdx's JBLS server doesn't work with lockdown as of now.

Nah, its a temp server im running why the main BNLS is down.
It currently supports messages 0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x09, 0x0C, 0x0D, 0x0E, 0x0F, 0x10, 0x18, 0x1A and clients RATS, PXES, NB2W, VD2D, PX2D, RTSJ, 3RAW, PX3W. ( 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 )
I havent really been able to test any of these packets apart from 0x1A, so know 0x1A is working correctly.
I have seen a few "kdown-IX86-XX.mpq"'s in the immediate window a few times, and a few empty version check strings.
Currently the following will cause a client to be disconnected on 0x1A:
If the packet lengh is under 22 or over 500 bytes.
If the client is not 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7or 8 (RATS, PXES, NB2W, VD2D, PX2D, RTSJ, 3RAW, PX3W)
If the file or formula are not null-terminated
If the file or formula are under 2 bytes in lengh
If you borrow more than 20 seconds packet time (version checks costs 1 second currently - to stop load spams across 1 connection) -- this will cause an IP ban tomorow (if BNLS is not back up by then) as well as some ip tracking/banning on connections/packets :)


Aside, does anyone know when are the main BNLS servers coming back up?
Soon hopefully.. damn reconnecting bots that are ip'ed/dead proxyed keep spaming me with 5 - 10 connections per-second :(
If BNLS isnt up by tomorow, they are all getting IP banned from useing my BNLS server :P

Mystical

#39
February 21, 2007, 03:43 AM
no no no, ipban notta =P i need it =)

Ringo

#40
February 21, 2007, 03:54 AM Last Edit: February 21, 2007, 04:00 AM by Ringo
Im thinking 100-200 connections per-hour limit, nothing to worry about for somone whos not rappidly connecting/requesting :)
I added a CR correction thingy for all them users that use 0x09 and ALWAYS use the lockdown file number 0 and the ver-IX86 file number 6. So even in that case the correct results should be returned, so older BNLS bots (pre-lockdown) should beable to use it, if they dont crash parseing the file number.
That will cut out alota users needing to rappid connect untill they get the 1 in 20 or 1 in 8 change to logon from being IP banned :P

Mystical

#41
February 21, 2007, 03:59 AM
ah, im good, I only connect once about every 10 days, im pretty stable.

Barabajagal

#42
February 21, 2007, 04:56 AM
Hmm... you may want to give this temp server to people you can trust with it... to lessen the load on your own server. Maybe get a No-IP host and a splitting server, so that clients will connect to the least busy of the servers...

Might I ask why this is in this topic? Methinks this should be split....

Don Cullen

#43
February 21, 2007, 05:48 AM
Apologies, I posted the wrong packet. I'm tired. >.<

Here's the 0x1A that keeps getting me disconnected:

0000: 32 00 1A 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 32  2............2
0010: 39 38 30 35 34 36 35 20 32 31 30 32 39 32 37 33  9805465 21029273
0020: 36 30 76 65 72 2D 49 58 38 36 2D 30 2E 6D 70 71  60ver-IX86-0.mpq
0030: 00 00                                            ................
Regards,
Don
-------

Don't wonder why people suddenly are hostile when you treat them the way they shouldn't be- it's called 'Mutual Respect'.

rabbit

#44
February 21, 2007, 05:48 AM
Ringo, I keep getting 0x1a failure out  of your server, but I got a normal result out of BNLS (when it was up) using the same code.  Are you using that database?
Grif: Yeah, and the people in the red states are mad because the people in the blue states are mean to them and want them to pay money for roads and schools instead of cool things like NASCAR and shotguns.  Also, there's something about ketchup in there.
Print
|
Go Up Pages 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
User actions