ThunderVB

[LivedKrad]

Thanks for the tip, UL. Except I downloaded the extra stuff it listed there to compile the additional C/ASM code. Anything else?

[Joe[x86]]

Can someone post a step-by-step, or a link to one, and the links to needed 3rd party software? Thanks!

[R.a.B.B.i.T]

I thought it said somewhere in the documentation that you need to download and install something else for the C/ASM to work?  Have you guys tried reading the documentation?

I have MASM and the C linker, just like the instructions say, but it's still evil!

[Hdx]

:/
Works perfectly fine for me, Cept you have to turn off creating the C linker files.
... but that dosent seems to effect much, I need a small program to write in C to test it..
~-~(HDX)~-~

[Tazo]

thats amazing that they released this open source, they couldve made a lot of money off of a program like this

[Topaz]

Doubt it, there's a lot of problems with it.

[LivedKrad]

Code Select Expand


Private Sub Form_Load()
MsgBox testT(2)
End Sub

Public Function testT(ByVal k As Integer) As Integer
'#C' int testT(int x)
'#C' {
'#C' return x;
'#C' }
End Function


Returns 0? Maybe I didn't install the VC++ SDK or masm in the right locations? Forgot a setup step?

Edit: I also tried returning k, same result. Apparently it's still being seen as comments and thus is skipping it. I guess I'm not compiling right? Simply running VB does not do the trick?

[Mangix]

darktype DID say it has a lot of problems with it.

anyways this programs sucks. if it wants to be useful, it would need to be in VB .NET cause VS 2005 will NOT have VB. only VB .NET(now named VB 2005). but then again .NET does have an Assembly namespace...

[K]

darktype DID say it has a lot of problems with it.

anyways this programs sucks. if it wants to be useful, it would need to be in VB .NET cause VS 2005 will NOT have VB. only VB .NET(now named VB 2005). but then again .NET does have an Assembly namespace...

And the 'Assembly' namespace has absolutely nothing to do with the assembly you are thinking of.

Also, there wouldn't be much purpose in allowing inline assembly in a language that's compiled to byte code.

[MyndFyre]

darktype DID say it has a lot of problems with it.

anyways this programs sucks. if it wants to be useful, it would need to be in VB .NET cause VS 2005 will NOT have VB. only VB .NET(now named VB 2005). but then again .NET does have an Assembly namespace...

And the 'Assembly' namespace has absolutely nothing to do with the assembly you are thinking of.

Also, there wouldn't be much purpose in allowing inline assembly in a language that's compiled to byte code.

No, Mangix just thinks that whatever he is working on at the present time is the best, most uberleet thing in the world, and everything else is just dumb.

[LivedKrad]

Sigh, nearly every time I ask for something in most of these forums someone always has to say something stupid, (like Mangix), and then everyone else starts replying to the idiocy of what was said by that person. I don't think anyone will ever tell me what I'm doing wrong .

[Explicit]

Reinstall it from scratch.

[Topaz]

ARE YOU COMPARING ME TO MANGIX??? OMGWTF>_<!!!

[Explicit]

ARE YOU COMPARING ME TO MANGIX??? OMGWTF>_<!!!

Obviously, he is, You and Mangix's relationship is so cute that it's nearly impossible to overlook. Opposites really do attract.

[Mangix]

darktype DID say it has a lot of problems with it.

anyways this programs sucks. if it wants to be useful, it would need to be in VB .NET cause VS 2005 will NOT have VB. only VB .NET(now named VB 2005). but then again .NET does have an Assembly namespace...

And the 'Assembly' namespace has absolutely nothing to do with the assembly you are thinking of.

Also, there wouldn't be much purpose in allowing inline assembly in a language that's compiled to byte code.

No, Mangix just thinks that whatever he is working on at the present time is the best, most uberleet thing in the world, and everything else is just dumb.

im not working on anything. im lazy. and no. that would be just like saying that Linux, Wine, Windows, Mac, and everything else is dumb. do i think it is? no