• Welcome to Valhalla Legends Archive.
 

Algebra II Questions

Started by hismajesty, December 17, 2003, 06:47 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Adron

So how do americans multiply


            [a b c]      [p]
[x y z]  *  [d e f]   *   [q]
            [g h i]      [r]



? What's your trick?

hismajesty

Quote from: Adron on December 18, 2003, 05:41 PM
So how do americans multiply


            [a b c]      [p]
[x y z]  *  [d e f]   *   [q]
            [g h i]      [r]



? What's your trick?

TI-83+

Adron

And what does that say about the problem?

hismajesty

Quote from: Adron on December 18, 2003, 06:01 PM
And what does that say about the problem?

That it's a matrix multiplication problem?

Adron

I thought you'd be able to figure that out without asking your TI-83+?

hismajesty


Spht

Quote from: Adron on December 18, 2003, 06:56 PM
I thought you'd be able to figure that out without asking your TI-83+?

Americans must have super calculators now days which requires students to do no thinking.

hismajesty

Quote from: Spht on December 18, 2003, 09:36 PM
Quote from: Adron on December 18, 2003, 06:56 PM
I thought you'd be able to figure that out without asking your TI-83+?

Americans must have super calculators now days which requires students to do no thinking.

We have to learn how to turn them on.

Yoni

#23
Ugh you TI-83+ dummies. Adron showed a first-degree two-vector polynomial in matrix form. You should recognize that for what it is:
axp + bxq + cxr + dyp + eyq + fyr + gzp + hzq + izr

Edit: "Two-vector" instead of "two-variable", there are 6 variables.

Adron

Hehe, that was exactly what I wanted him to show :)

hismajesty

Complain to my teacher, she said you'll never have to deal with that without using the calculator.  :-[

Yoni

Quote from: hismajesty on December 19, 2003, 08:14 AM
Complain to my teacher, she said you'll never have to deal with that without using the calculator.  :-[
She must not think very highly of her students... :(

hismajesty

Ah but what gets me is that we can't use calculators on the test. So instead of teaching us the way to do it without one she didn't include it on the test earlier this year.  :-\

iago

Quote from: hismajesty on December 17, 2003, 06:47 PM
1) I've noticed that in a few example problems my teacher did while getting factors from zeros of a paraballa's(sp?) curve that they have been the exact opposite. (example: Zeros of the function are (-1,0) & (5,0) while the factors are (X-5) & (X+1) is this always the case?

Yeah, I'm a little late, but anyway, the reason it's like this is the zeroes are what you have to add to the factor to get 0.  
So for the two examples, you would do this:
X - 5 = 0 --> x = 5
X + 1 = 0--> x = -1

Make sense?
This'll make an interesting test for broken AV:
QuoteX5O!P%@AP[4\PZX54(P^)7CC)7}$EICAR-STANDARD-ANTIVIRUS-TEST-FILE!$H+H*


j0k3r

#29
Quote from: iago on December 19, 2003, 10:18 PM
Quote from: hismajesty on December 17, 2003, 06:47 PM
1) I've noticed that in a few example problems my teacher did while getting factors from zeros of a paraballa's(sp?) curve that they have been the exact opposite. (example: Zeros of the function are (-1,0) & (5,0) while the factors are (X-5) & (X+1) is this always the case?

Yeah, I'm a little late, but anyway, the reason it's like this is the zeroes are what you have to add to the factor to get 0.  
So for the two examples, you would do this:
X - 5 = 0 --> x = 5
X + 1 = 0--> x = -1

Make sense?

That works but actually it's because in the general form of the equation, the sign is negative, so all you have to do is reverse the sign. So (x-h) and (y-k) are the general form, and if you have (x-5) and (y+1) the 5 is positive, and the 1 is negative because a negative and a negative make a positive.
QuoteAnyone attempting to generate random numbers by deterministic means is, of course, living in a state of sin
John Vo

|