• Welcome to Valhalla Legends Archive.
 

Microsoft Office 2003/XP

Started by hismajesty, March 17, 2004, 04:59 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

hismajesty

I have 2003 and am thinking about installing XP, but I was wondering if 2003 was better than XP. Post your opinions of each with pros/cons please.

Yoni

I have 2000 and am thinking about installing XP, but I was wondering if 2000 was better than XP. Post your opinions of each with pros/cons please.

iago

Yoni's has been done to death and should be moved to the stupid argument forum
This'll make an interesting test for broken AV:
QuoteX5O!P%@AP[4\PZX54(P^)7CC)7}$EICAR-STANDARD-ANTIVIRUS-TEST-FILE!$H+H*


Thing

I don't understand peoples compulsion to keep upgrading their Microsoft Office Suite.
What about the new features to you just have to have?  I get along just fine
with a simple text editor.  If I need to do a pdf or a spread sheet I crank up OO.
That sucking sound you hear is my bandwidth.

iago

Quote from: Thing on March 17, 2004, 08:27 AM
I don't understand peoples compulsion to keep upgrading their Microsoft Office Suite.
What about the new features to you just have to have?  I get along just fine
with a simple text editor.  If I need to do a pdf or a spread sheet I crank up OO.

yes, vi + oo = my office suite.  If I need to edit a file anywhere, I open a terminal and vi it.  gogo vi! :)
This'll make an interesting test for broken AV:
QuoteX5O!P%@AP[4\PZX54(P^)7CC)7}$EICAR-STANDARD-ANTIVIRUS-TEST-FILE!$H+H*


MyndFyre

#5
I really like Office 2003.  Overall, it just looks nicer; the voice recognition is slightly better for me (but it may just be that I'm on a better computer); I'm not sure if they've tweaked it at all.

I can't think of any features introduced that are particuarly compelling, but if you like eye candy, go for Office 2k3.  :)

[edit] I lied.  Outlook 2003 is far superior to 2002, particularly with 1.) the junk mail filter, 2.) the email view in general, and 3.) the side-by-side calendar views.  I didn't like the e-mail view initially, but it is grown on me rather quickly.  :)
QuoteEvery generation of humans believed it had all the answers it needed, except for a few mysteries they assumed would be solved at any moment. And they all believed their ancestors were simplistic and deluded. What are the odds that you are the first generation of humans who will understand reality?

After 3 years, it's on the horizon.  The new JinxBot, and BN#, the managed Battle.net Client library.

Quote from: chyea on January 16, 2009, 05:05 PM
You've just located global warming.

Skywing

#6
Does it fix the really horrible lockup / not-retrieving-new-mail-until-you-restart-it bugs that Outlook XP has when losing your Internet connection?

Kp

Quote from: Myndfyre on March 17, 2004, 08:27 PM[edit] I lied.  Outlook 2003 is far superior to 2002, particularly with 1.) the junk mail filter, 2.) the email view in general, and 3.) the side-by-side calendar views.  I didn't like the e-mail view initially, but it is grown on me rather quickly.  :)

Have they improved its capability to relay viruses any?  One of my biggest concerns with any installation of Outlook is insufficient potential to rapidly propagate e-mail virii.  All that scripting makes it pretty easy, but some virii still manage not to spread properly.
[19:20:23] (BotNet) <[vL]Kp> Any idiot can make a bot with CSB, and many do!

Stealth

Quote from: Kp on March 18, 2004, 11:20 AM
Have they improved its capability to relay viruses any?  One of my biggest concerns with any installation of Outlook is insufficient potential to rapidly propagate e-mail virii.  All that scripting makes it pretty easy, but some virii still manage not to spread properly.

Indeed, the "w32.NotSoBig.F@mm" virus was having some trouble propagating due to Outlook's shoddy virus redistribution system. I was very disappointed.
- Stealth
Author of StealthBot

Yoni

I don't use Outlook and voice recognition. I use just Word and occasionally Excel. Should I upgrade to XP?

iago

I was reading somewhere that somebody tried running some version of netsky on WINE and it only sent out blank emails.  Apparently, he was very disappointed and wanted to report this bug to either the virus author or the WINE author.
This'll make an interesting test for broken AV:
QuoteX5O!P%@AP[4\PZX54(P^)7CC)7}$EICAR-STANDARD-ANTIVIRUS-TEST-FILE!$H+H*


Hostile

#11
Office 2003 is far better then 2000/XP. As MyndFyre stated yes the overall appearance is much nicer, but the layout is for many features as well. Outlook, more so then anything received the most improvements out of the Office System. It has a more organized feel, no annoying features included, and its filters and worm/virus protection are much much better. Apon noticing a known virus, it catches, edits the email for no malicious content (including attachments) and notifies you put a header on the email of what happens, ect.

Although the argument on wether or not its worth -paying- for the upgrade, I think most of you can get it "cheap" one way or anouther, and in that case its very much worth it. Too bad for most of you, disregarded my preaching to attend Microsoft Office * Launch events and get your free retail software gifts. Many other Office related events also provide free full versions, what more can you ask considering they're all free events too?

laurion: Be more observant, on top of not making sense we're talking about productivity suites, not operating systems.
- Hostile is sexy.