versioncheckex2 issue.

[fuzan]

Hmm, I just spotted an extra 'C2' byte that's immediately following the IX86ver's null terminator in the BNLS packet and not the S0x50. Furthermore, it seems as if that entire string is mangled. Perhaps this is it! Now to find out where it's coming from.

[Skywing]

In general, any "lockdown" version check challenge string which does not fit the size limitation of 16 bytes is unlikely to be valid.

[Barabajagal]

uhm.. no. Lockdown strings are 15, 16, or 17 bytes. There is no limitation.

[rabbit]

You're arguing with the only guy to have definitely reversed lockdown?  WTF are you smoking?

[tumeria]

RealityRipple is obviously addled in the brain o_o;

[Hdx]

Hes arguing due to the fact that value strings of length 15-17 have been seen in the wild.
Also, from what ive seen, it dosen't care about the length of the value string, it only uses the 1st 16 bytes.
~Hdx

[Barabajagal]

how can it use the first 16 if there's only 15?