C++ (win32 api programming) (GUI)

[DarkMinion]

This will solve all your god damned GUI trouble.  I swear, you people do everything the hard way (or the gay MFC-like way)  

http://dmbot.virtualave.net/SampleWin32.zip

[TheMinistered]

If I recall my example did not use MFC.  Perhaps your blatant remark was not aimed towards me?

[DarkMinion]

Ok, considering your example isn't in this thread, it wasn't aimed at you.

[TheMinistered]

Ok, considering That I == n00blar, then you are wrong

[DarkMinion]

 

Oh, then your example IS MFC-like

[TheMinistered]

Please define "MFC-LIKE" and describe what the difference between "MFC" & "MFC-LIKE" IS.

[Eibro]

I'd say "MFC-like" is synonymous for object-oriented.
Some people prefer writing object oriented code; others prefer pure procedural.  That's all there is to it.

[Camel]

Some people prefer writing object oriented code; others prefer pure procedural.  That's all there is to it.

Not true; there are advantages to both. In some cases, one is clearly better than the other. In other cases, it is highly debatable (see: 'tagbans' in the botdev forum).

[DarkMinion]

Nah, just your class names look MFC-like, I was just joking with you  

Oh, and VB sucks Camel.

[Eibro]

Eh, this is exactly what I was trying to avoid.

Some people prefer writing object oriented code; others prefer pure procedural.  That's all there is to it.

<snip>there are advantages to both</snip>

That's pretty much the point I was making.

I get what you're saying now, DM I hate the prefixed 'C' on class names, I think it's completely pointless (and ugly)

Edit: And please tell me, Camel, how is reading all that long-winded garbage in the tagbans topic going to help me? I can tell you, it's certainly not going to give me any better understanding of OOP vs. Procedural programming.

[Camel]

Nah, just your class names look MFC-like, I was just joking with you  

Oh, and VB sucks Camel.

that's brilliant, dm!

[DarkMinion]

At least you can admit that.