BasicOP

[rabbit]

I already made that.

[Mystical]

shoulda posted this uhm when i replyed the first time... n its not to out dated since someone else posted couple days ago =)

Looks like, everyone that replyed got the subject wrong, everything will be coded in the bot, sadly, i don't think vb6 could handle such a thing or well, it would actually be one huge project,  that'll be some lagg when compiling, so if you wont use any external ocx/activex blah blah blah ect, would be you elimitating API's aswell? =) , and im guessing no bncsutil.dll, bnetauth.dll hmm going to write your own checkrevision functions in vb? =\

[l2k-Shadow]

checkrevision in vb taking 20 seconds for war3 for the loss.

[l)ragon]

checkrevision in vb taking 20 seconds for war3 for the loss.

Fix it then ;p

[Joe[x86]]

Hahaha, that's horrible! I read something about unrolling a loop in there making it go faster (the processor can just move forward instead of having to go back), so I wonder if that'd work well. Look in MBNCSUtil's code for an example.

[MyndFyre]

x86] link=topic=14864.msg157737#msg157737 date=1157892624]
Hahaha, that's horrible! I read something about unrolling a loop in there making it go faster (the processor can just move forward instead of having to go back), so I wonder if that'd work well. Look in MBNCSUtil's code for an example.

Unrolling a loop is to keep code caches effective (the L1 cache of a processor, for example).  Repeatedly jumping backwards can cause the cache to miss.  I took the idea from BNCSUtil, although if you look at the original BNCSUtil source code, shadypalm used macros to simplify the code much more than I could do in C#.

It would never cause a 20 second delay.