• Welcome to Valhalla Legends Archive.
 

XHTML 1.1

Started by Banana fanna fo fanna, April 30, 2004, 11:25 PM

Previous topic - Next topic
Print
|
Go Down Pages1
User actions

Banana fanna fo fanna

April 30, 2004, 11:25 PM
Enlighten me. :)

MyndFyre

#1
May 01, 2004, 02:06 AM
QuoteEvery generation of humans believed it had all the answers it needed, except for a few mysteries they assumed would be solved at any moment. And they all believed their ancestors were simplistic and deluded. What are the odds that you are the first generation of humans who will understand reality?

After 3 years, it's on the horizon.  The new JinxBot, and BN#, the managed Battle.net Client library.

Quote from: chyea on January 16, 2009, 05:05 PM
You've just located global warming.

Yoni

#2
May 02, 2004, 05:28 AM
Looks like tiny changes from 1.0 plus the inclusion of Ruby (which I know pretty much nothing about):

http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/changes.html#a_changes

quasi-modo

#3
May 11, 2004, 09:20 PM
For my purposes the only difference is that 1.1 has no name attribute when 1.0 strict does. That is why I will not be able to make affective use of 1.1 when using asp.net elements. I use xhtml on pages without forms, but when I bust out the forms I generally drop back to html 4.01 transitional. I hope asp.net 2 cleans up the output, it would make life easier. I could just do forms the old way, like in asp classic by calling the script from the action, but asp.net allows me to do the same type of stuff asp classic did with a lot less code, I do not want to do it the old way  :'(.
WAR EAGLE!
Quote(00:04:08) zdv17: yeah i quit doing that stuff cause it jacked up the power bill too much
(00:04:19) nick is a turtle: Right now im not paying the power bill though
(00:04:33) nick is a turtle: if i had to pay the electric bill
(00:04:47) nick is a turtle: id hibernate when i go to class
(00:04:57) nick is a turtle: or at least when i go to sleep
(00:08:50) zdv17: hibernating in class is cool.. esp. when you leave a drool puddle

MyndFyre

#4
May 12, 2004, 01:14 PM
Quote from: peofeoknight on May 11, 2004, 09:20 PM
For my purposes the only difference is that 1.1 has no name attribute when 1.0 strict does. That is why I will not be able to make affective use of 1.1 when using asp.net elements. I use xhtml on pages without forms, but when I bust out the forms I generally drop back to html 4.01 transitional. I hope asp.net 2 cleans up the output, it would make life easier. I could just do forms the old way, like in asp classic by calling the script from the action, but asp.net allows me to do the same type of stuff asp classic did with a lot less code, I do not want to do it the old way  :'(.

Bleh.  Use XHTML 1.1 transitional!  :P
QuoteEvery generation of humans believed it had all the answers it needed, except for a few mysteries they assumed would be solved at any moment. And they all believed their ancestors were simplistic and deluded. What are the odds that you are the first generation of humans who will understand reality?

After 3 years, it's on the horizon.  The new JinxBot, and BN#, the managed Battle.net Client library.

Quote from: chyea on January 16, 2009, 05:05 PM
You've just located global warming.

Grok

#5
May 12, 2004, 02:24 PM
Quote from: Myndfyre on May 12, 2004, 01:14 PM
Bleh.  Use XHTML 1.1 transitional!  :P

I still don't "grasp" XHTML 1.1 strict.  If someone could explain it better than W3C, I'd be interested.

po0f

#6
May 12, 2004, 09:51 PM Last Edit: May 12, 2004, 09:51 PM by po0f
I don't believe there is an XHTML 1.1 strict dtd. Afaik, 1.1 is based on 1.0 strict, with even stricter guidelines. It's all or nothing.

I use 1.0 strict, I haven't gotten around to learning about 1.1 either.
Print
|
Go Up Pages1
User actions