order in making a bot

Eibro · February 17, 2003, 10:07 AM

'\4'

Banana fanna fo fanna · February 17, 2003, 11:17 AM

ipban perhaps

Camel · February 22, 2003, 11:03 AM

Quote0x01 8p

its not actually packet 0x01, its just a single byte

Noodlez · February 22, 2003, 08:12 PM

so? its still a packet.
just because if doesnt have the bnet packet header doesn't mean it's not a packet.

Camel · February 23, 2003, 05:56 AM

how did i know you were going to say that...

yes, but you wouldnt call it "packet 0x01", because then you would have to call every othe packet "0xFF" or "0xFF 0xwhatever"

[edit] me fail english?

Banana fanna fo fanna · February 23, 2003, 06:35 AM

I prefer referring to them as "bnet messages" instead of "packets," because you have no control over the TCP packets when you're using the TCP layer.

Yoni · February 23, 2003, 08:56 AM

Quoteno control

Well, technically you have a little control...
Even without using raw sockets, you can change some things in the header with setsockopt.

Camel · February 23, 2003, 09:08 AM

if you're handy enough. you could send() some data, and then quicly hack the memory before it gets sent

Yoni · February 23, 2003, 09:10 AM

Quoteif you're handy enough. you could send() some data, and then quicly hack the memory before it gets sent

ehh... No, if you really wanted to do something like that, you'd install some kind of API hook/jmp before calling send, not do it "quickly after"!

Skywing · February 23, 2003, 10:19 AM

Quoteif you're handy enough. you could send() some data, and then quicly hack the memory before it gets sent

By the way, at least on NT your data is quickly passed on to kernel mode drivers, such as NDIS.SYS. You'd have a hard time bothering kernel mode memory from user mode.

Banana fanna fo fanna · February 25, 2003, 11:11 AM

Yoni: notice how I said TCP layer

order in making a bot

Camel

Camel

Camel