• Welcome to Valhalla Legends Archive.
 

Flags

Started by BlazingKnight, September 19, 2003, 11:51 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

BlazingKnight


Skywing

Quote from: BlazingKnight on September 20, 2003, 01:13 PM
Why disable a bunch of functions when I can just disconnect?

Primarily Blizzard employees seem to prefer to go around with invisible mode on or as non-privileged accounts.  If you're trying to hide from them, your solution is no solution at all.

Soul Taker

#17
First reply in the thread =P
Quote from: Soul Taker on September 20, 2003, 02:42 AM
You might never see the representitive though!

iago

Quote from: Kp on September 20, 2003, 10:26 AM
Quote from: iago on September 20, 2003, 06:15 AM
  static const DWORD CHAT_FLAG                    = 0x10;
This name is a bit misleading.  While it does indicate the user is confined to chatting, it could be interpreted that the user is on a chatgate client (another correct, but incomplete interpretation).  0x10 technically specifies that the user did not indicate UDP support, which is true for all chatgate bots; it can also be true for game clients (or emulations thereof) which are connected to the network in such a way as to be unable to pass the test.

hmm, I didn't name those myself.  I *think* got them from spht, but I could be wrong.
This'll make an interesting test for broken AV:
QuoteX5O!P%@AP[4\PZX54(P^)7CC)7}$EICAR-STANDARD-ANTIVIRUS-TEST-FILE!$H+H*


Spht

Quote from: iago on September 20, 2003, 03:16 PM
Quote from: Kp on September 20, 2003, 10:26 AM
Quote from: iago on September 20, 2003, 06:15 AM
  static const DWORD CHAT_FLAG                    = 0x10;
This name is a bit misleading.  While it does indicate the user is confined to chatting, it could be interpreted that the user is on a chatgate client (another correct, but incomplete interpretation).  0x10 technically specifies that the user did not indicate UDP support, which is true for all chatgate bots; it can also be true for game clients (or emulations thereof) which are connected to the network in such a way as to be unable to pass the test.

hmm, I didn't name those myself.  I *think* got them from spht, but I could be wrong.

You never got them from me.

Soul Taker

I'd say blame the Canadian... but, which one?  :P

iago

hmm, perhaps it was Arta then.  I don't remember anymore..
This'll make an interesting test for broken AV:
QuoteX5O!P%@AP[4\PZX54(P^)7CC)7}$EICAR-STANDARD-ANTIVIRUS-TEST-FILE!$H+H*


UserLoser

maybe he wants to make a floodbot that floods BTS, so when he sees a rep there, it stops flooding.

Spht

Quote from: UserLoser on September 20, 2003, 04:46 PM
maybe he wants to make a floodbot that floods BTS, so when he sees a rep there, it stops flooding.

Isn't there always a representative there?

UserLoser

Usually. Sometimes TechBot isn't there, unless it's hidden.  Also it appears no reps are there, but who knows? :P