Documentation for the SOCKS4/SOCKS5 protocols

[Topaz]

Thanks, including function subs and stuff wouldn't hurt either.

[PaiD]

um there is a 'Search' feature on the forum. This has been covered over and over

[R.a.B.B.i.T]

Protocols generally don't have function subs.

[Blaze]

Actually, by protocol he means, Give me all the code to do it, in such a way I can easily insert it into my already leached project. (Rough translation)

[Topaz]

We're rather negative today, aren't we? You also have poor interpretation skills.

[UserLoser.]

SOCKS4

[MyndFyre]

We're rather negative today, aren't we? You also have poor interpretation skills.

Topaz, I would figure you would know that most of us would direct you to Google to search for "SOCKS protocol specification."

While that didn't absolutely give me a term (I didn't check for sure), but the first search result specified RFC 1928, which -- as it happens -- is SOCKS 5.

All of this, including posting this thorough and (hopefully somewhat) condescending post took me < 2 minutes.