My problem with Ron Paul is, yeah, sure, some of the things he says makes sense, but a lot of what he says doesn't. he's been harping on about hyper inflation for years now, and there are still no signs of that happening (in fact, in economies with a competent central bank, it should be nearly impossible..). I can find a lot of common ground with him on foreign policy, but at a closer look, the reasoning he uses to arrives at the conclusions he does are much different than mine. Its all driven by a very simplistic view of the Constitution and the role of Government. That's what I can't stomach, his positions on a lot of things are way too extreme.
However, as a person, he comes across as very sincere and consistent which is a breath of fresh air. I can appreciate his honesty, I just fundamentally disagree with a lot of his viewpoints.
My favorite candidate of the Republican field was really Jon Huntsman, it's a shame he conceded, because he was a very bright guy and he was great at policy. I was impressed. Go figure, the primary process kills off the only candidate with even a remote chance of beating Obama (people are dreaming if they think Romney will beat Obama in the general, much less Newt. Paul is a bridge too far for a lot of Republicans, and Santorum isn't competent enough to run a general campaign.)
However, as a person, he comes across as very sincere and consistent which is a breath of fresh air. I can appreciate his honesty, I just fundamentally disagree with a lot of his viewpoints.
My favorite candidate of the Republican field was really Jon Huntsman, it's a shame he conceded, because he was a very bright guy and he was great at policy. I was impressed. Go figure, the primary process kills off the only candidate with even a remote chance of beating Obama (people are dreaming if they think Romney will beat Obama in the general, much less Newt. Paul is a bridge too far for a lot of Republicans, and Santorum isn't competent enough to run a general campaign.)