Valhalla Legends Archive

General => General Discussion => Topic started by: Thing on November 27, 2004, 01:16 PM

Title: nmap vs. FBI
Post by: Thing on November 27, 2004, 01:16 PM
You might want to use a proxy when downloading the latest version from insecure.org

http://www.securityfocus.com/news/10011
Title: Re: nmap vs. FBI
Post by: iago on November 27, 2004, 02:28 PM
Shame on you for not giving it from the original source!
http://seclists.org/lists/nmap-hackers/2004/Oct-Dec/0004.html

I wish more people would subscribe/post on that list, it's kinda boring :/
Title: Re: nmap vs. FBI
Post by: hismajesty on November 27, 2004, 03:09 PM
I read it on Slashdot the other day, too slow Thing. :P
Title: Re: nmap vs. FBI
Post by: iago on November 27, 2004, 03:31 PM
I love reading the mailing lists.  That's where all the stuff starts, then news things and slashdot and other stuff report based on the mailing lists.  Like the internet explorer iframe exploit -- watching it develop there was pretty cool.  The guy who found it, then the guy who wrote exploit code for it, are both active members, and they posted it on Bugtraq and Full Disclosure.  He also complained there how mydoom used it, and he wants to sue the guy that made mydoom for violating his code :)
Title: Re: nmap vs. FBI
Post by: Arta on November 28, 2004, 10:31 AM
I used to be on nmap-hackers, but I never bothered re-subscribing to it. Think I should?

I'm on incidents/bugtraq/webappsec, but I only get the digests. The full lists are too untidy :)
Title: Re: nmap vs. FBI
Post by: iago on November 28, 2004, 02:26 PM
There's very little traffic at nmap-hackers.  But it's nice to see a question every once in awhile, since I use nmap daily