Quote from: Mystical on December 18, 2009, 09:33 PM
I'm interested in a (.NET warden handler library), I don't think anyone has made one public though, Search of the forums reveals Ribose said he wrote a handler, doesn't seem to be public however, hopefully MyndFyre implements one into MBNCSUtil.dll soon.
I thought MyndFyre stopped updating it? O.o
Quote from: MusicDemon on December 28, 2009, 11:03 AM
I thought MyndFyre stopped updating it? O.o
You thought wrong?
Ugh, my bad :-[
Could you give a valid link to the source?
I haven't been able to find it O.o BN# doesn't uses you latest version, does it?
jinxbot.com
Quote from: MusicDemon on December 29, 2009, 03:29 PM
Ugh, my bad :-[
Could you give a valid link to the source?
I haven't been able to find it O.o BN# doesn't uses you latest version, does it?
The documentation homepage (http://jinxbot.net/mbncsutil/) has links to the downloads; you can get source code out of the JinxBot subversion repository at /branches/mbncsutil/trunk/ (http://code.google.com/p/jinxbot/source/browse/#svn/branches/mbncsutil/trunk). BN# also has MBNCSUtil rolled into it, yes; however, instead of it being in the MBNCSUtil namespace, everything is in BNSharp.MBNCSUtil. Very minor change.
@rabbit: you fail!
Quote from: MyndFyre on December 30, 2009, 09:55 AM
Quote from: MusicDemon on December 29, 2009, 03:29 PM
Ugh, my bad :-[
Could you give a valid link to the source?
I haven't been able to find it O.o BN# doesn't uses you latest version, does it?
The documentation homepage (http://jinxbot.net/mbncsutil/) has links to the downloads; you can get source code out of the JinxBot subversion repository at /branches/mbncsutil/trunk/ (http://code.google.com/p/jinxbot/source/browse/#svn/branches/mbncsutil/trunk). BN# also has MBNCSUtil rolled into it, yes; however, instead of it being in the MBNCSUtil namespace, everything is in BNSharp.MBNCSUtil. Very minor change.
@rabbit: you fail!
I tried to convert it from C# to VB... It failed dramatically... I was searching for the code you used to compile the pre-compiled version. Since there are things in BN# which aren't in MBNCS but needed in it...
So why don't you just use BN#?
Trying to port MBNCSUtil from C# to VB directly (using something like a language converter program) would be impossible because it uses pointers.
Again, you can get the code used to compile MBNCSUtil from /branches/mbncsutil/trunk of the JinxBot SVN repository. MBNCSUtil is now considered a "branch" of BN#. You can get it with svn checkout http://jinxbot.googlecode.com/svn/branches/mbncsutil/trunk/ jinxbot-read-only.
What do you want in MBNCSUtil that is in BN#, and why? (In other words, submit a feature request).
Id like a bnls header option for the packetbuffer
well currently im just using databuffer for my bnls packets =P
BNLS isn't part of Battle.net, so that won't ever get into MBNCSUtil.
Subclass DataBuffer like I did for BncsPacket? I think Lead has done that.
[edit] Split from the other thread since it doesn't really fit the other topic.
Lead and I have both subclassed DataBuffer and DataReader (Lead for BNLS and me for Botnet and something else I forget now). It's really not that hard at all. In fact, it's easy enough to just subclass DataBuffer and not bother with subclassing DataReader.
so then what's with the
Quote
BNLS integration, due for version 2.3.
So... My topic I guess? :D
Well, I ONLY want to use MBNCS because there are bugs with BN# handling clan stuff...
And because I really want to create my own bot (a)
Quote from: Mystical on December 31, 2009, 03:42 PM
so then what's with the
Quote
BNLS integration, due for version 2.3.
Dirty lies.
Quote from: MusicDemon on December 31, 2009, 07:45 PM
So... My topic I guess? :D
Well, I ONLY want to use MBNCS because there are bugs with BN# handling clan stuff...
And because I really want to create my own bot (a)
You can override BN#'s clan-handling behavior by overriding the default packet handlers for clan events. However, I am not aware of any such defects (http://code.google.com/p/jinxbot/issues/list) in the latest version of source...
You've got the end-tag of an url... Where's the beginning? O.o
I am not aware of any such defects
That's the link.