I'm not 100% but I was looking through Warcraft 2 in hex editor and noticed similarities between Starcraft and Warcraft with the whole verbyte theory.
Since unfortunately I don't have any previous versions of warcraft 2, I can't really verify this.
C7 46 10 ** 00 00 00 C7 46 18 08 00 00 00 C7
Warcraft III and Diablo II's verbyte are actually located in the file version. 1.[23].214.
Quote from: PunK on April 10, 2009, 11:44 PM
I'm not 100% but I was looking through Warcraft 2 in hex editor and noticed similarities between Starcraft and Warcraft with the whole verbyte theory.
Since unfortunately I don't have any previous versions of warcraft 2, I can't really verify this.
C7 46 10 ** 00 00 00 C7 46 18 08 00 00 00 C7
Warcraft III and Diablo II's verbyte are actually located in the file version. 1.[23].214.
Is this common knowledge in Battle.net bot development? Or did no one notice this somehow after all this time?
Quote from: Yegg on April 11, 2009, 02:50 AM
Is this common knowledge in Battle.net bot development? Or did no one notice this somehow after all this time?
It is common knowledge. It just so happens that because it's not documented, people tend to assume it's a new discovery.
Quote from: brew on April 11, 2009, 10:31 AM
Quote from: Yegg on April 11, 2009, 02:50 AM
Is this common knowledge in Battle.net bot development? Or did no one notice this somehow after all this time?
It is common knowledge. It just so happens that because it's not documented, people tend to assume it's a new discovery.
It should be put on that bnetdocs site.
Quote from: Yegg on April 11, 2009, 10:35 AM
Quote from: brew on April 11, 2009, 10:31 AM
Quote from: Yegg on April 11, 2009, 02:50 AM
Is this common knowledge in Battle.net bot development? Or did no one notice this somehow after all this time?
It is common knowledge. It just so happens that because it's not documented, people tend to assume it's a new discovery.
It should be put on that bnetdocs site.
Haha, "that bnetdocs site".
For crying out loud, people want the real deal. The official bnetdocs should be remade along with the revival of the main site.
Quote from: Yegg on April 11, 2009, 02:50 AM
Quote from: PunK on April 10, 2009, 11:44 PM
I'm not 100% but I was looking through Warcraft 2 in hex editor and noticed similarities between Starcraft and Warcraft with the whole verbyte theory.
Since unfortunately I don't have any previous versions of warcraft 2, I can't really verify this.
C7 46 10 ** 00 00 00 C7 46 18 08 00 00 00 C7
Warcraft III and Diablo II's verbyte are actually located in the file version. 1.[23].214.
Is this common knowledge in Battle.net bot development? Or did no one notice this somehow after all this time?
Considering it's not on bnetdocs, I don't see how it could be considered "common knowledge"...
Quote from: brew on April 11, 2009, 11:26 AM
Quote from: Yegg on April 11, 2009, 10:35 AM
Quote from: brew on April 11, 2009, 10:31 AM
Quote from: Yegg on April 11, 2009, 02:50 AM
Is this common knowledge in Battle.net bot development? Or did no one notice this somehow after all this time?
It is common knowledge. It just so happens that because it's not documented, people tend to assume it's a new discovery.
It should be put on that bnetdocs site.
Haha, "that bnetdocs site".
For crying out loud, people want the real deal. The official bnetdocs should be remade along with the revival of the main site.
I agree.
Quote from: PunK on April 11, 2009, 01:26 PM
Quote from: Yegg on April 11, 2009, 02:50 AM
Quote from: PunK on April 10, 2009, 11:44 PM
I'm not 100% but I was looking through Warcraft 2 in hex editor and noticed similarities between Starcraft and Warcraft with the whole verbyte theory.
Since unfortunately I don't have any previous versions of warcraft 2, I can't really verify this.
C7 46 10 ** 00 00 00 C7 46 18 08 00 00 00 C7
Warcraft III and Diablo II's verbyte are actually located in the file version. 1.[23].214.
Is this common knowledge in Battle.net bot development? Or did no one notice this somehow after all this time?
Considering it's not on bnetdocs, I don't see how it could be considered "common knowledge"...
I suppose virtually all regular Battle.net developers (ie. the one's that make their own code and don't rip sources) are aware of the fact, so then I'd say it's mostly common knowledge.
Quote from: brew on April 11, 2009, 11:26 AM
Haha, "that bnetdocs site".
For crying out loud, people want the real deal. The official bnetdocs should be remade along with the revival of the main site.
We'll take this under advisement.
Quote from: MyndFyre[vL] on April 11, 2009, 08:29 PM
Quote from: brew on April 11, 2009, 11:26 AM
Haha, "that bnetdocs site".
For crying out loud, people want the real deal. The official bnetdocs should be remade along with the revival of the main site.
We'll take this under advisement.
Any word on why it was taken down to begin with?
Quote from: Yegg on April 11, 2009, 09:35 PM
Any word on why it was taken down to begin with?
im flippin burgers u at kinkos straight flippin coppies.
Quote from: bulletproof tiger on April 11, 2009, 09:51 PM
Quote from: Yegg on April 11, 2009, 09:35 PM
Any word on why it was taken down to begin with?
im flippin burgers u at kinkos straight flippin coppies.
copies*