http://acid3.acidtests.org/
How does your browser do?
Only browsers to implement Acid3 are Safari and Opera (in their developmental builds) and they do so quite hackishly and in an effort to claim a "first" on something as useless as an Acid3 test. Why set the bar so low?
Make the standard CSS 3 / DOM 2.0 or bust. I always thought these tests were quite silly.
Why do you think Acid2 was a goofy smiley face?
Quote from: Andy on April 08, 2008, 05:47 PM
Why do you think Acid2 was a goofy smiley face?
If that's your opinion, then shouldn't you have posted this in the fun forum?
Quote from: Andy on April 08, 2008, 02:16 PM
http://acid3.acidtests.org/
How does your browser do?
It crashed Opera 9.25 ^^
What gets me is that both FireFox and Safari did better their first times loading the page than they did in future loads/refreshes. LoL
I'm on FF3B5. Got to 70% every time I tried.
Ha! A new reason not to like Opera.
Quote from: Spht on April 08, 2008, 06:03 PM
Quote from: Andy on April 08, 2008, 05:47 PM
Why do you think Acid2 was a goofy smiley face?
If that's your opinion, then shouldn't you have posted this in the fun forum?
"A little nonsense now and then is relished by the wisest men."
Quote from: Andy on April 08, 2008, 06:27 PM
I'm on FF3B5. Got to 70% every time I tried.
Same browser, except on Linux, 71%.
2008032620?
Edit: Just got on Minefield 3.0pre (2008040805) and it got to 71%, too.
110%. i guess my browser just tries harder than everyone elses.
lol, IE 12%
Quote from: Dale on April 09, 2008, 03:13 PM
lol, IE 12%
Yea, IE6 fares even worse I believe. IE8 is supposed to (in it's final form) score decently well as primitive CSS3 is being implemented into it. I don't expect full blown SVG support or even CSS animations -- but something will be there.
Also, you can note that IE (8, not sure about 7) actually does pretty well on the CSS based tests. The SVG rendering is pretty much what screws it up.
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.13) Gecko/20080311 Firefox/2.0.0.13
53%.
aw, doesn't work at all in IE 5 for mac...
Quote from: Banana fanna fo fanna on April 09, 2008, 10:48 PM
aw, doesn't work at all in IE 5 for mac...
That's odd, I heard that engine is even more standards compliant than IE6.
Quote from: Warrior on April 09, 2008, 11:15 PM
Quote from: Banana fanna fo fanna on April 09, 2008, 10:48 PM
aw, doesn't work at all in IE 5 for mac...
That's odd, I heard that engine is even more standards compliant than IE6.
Well, it didn't understand .png files...THAT'S how old it is.
Quote from: Banana fanna fo fanna on April 10, 2008, 01:17 AM
Quote from: Warrior on April 09, 2008, 11:15 PM
Quote from: Banana fanna fo fanna on April 09, 2008, 10:48 PM
aw, doesn't work at all in IE 5 for mac...
That's odd, I heard that engine is even more standards compliant than IE6.
Well, it didn't understand .png files...THAT'S how old it is.
Ah, yea that might do it. Then again, IE6 didn't understand PNG files..so I wonder if it fares any better. I remember it getting like a 6 on IE6
It does... sort of... IIRC it just doesn't handle transparencies in PNG correctly.
ie5 asked me if i wanted to open a helper app for png files.